Energy

Cheaper Fuel Cells

A new membrane makes fuel cells more powerful and less expensive to produce.

  • Wednesday, April 5, 2006
  • By Kevin Bullis

Fuel cells still cost too much to be a viable alternative for internal combustion engines in cars -- they require expensive materials and are difficult to make. Now, according to results presented last week at the American Chemical Society meeting in Atlanta, a new, simple-to-produce material boosts the performance of fuel cells many times -- and could be a major step toward making them affordable.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill researchers who developed the new material say it can "dramatically outperform" the material now used to form fuel-cell membranes. Proton-exchange membranes are used in fuel cells to sort protons and electrons, by allowing the protons to pass through them from one electrode to the other, while blocking electrons and forcing them to travel between electrodes via an external circuit, powering a motor or other electronic device along the way.

[To see images of the new material for fuel cells, click here.]

Advertisement

The researchers say the new membrane conducts protons nearly three times as well as the currently used material, significantly improving power density. Also, unlike the current material, the new membrane can be easily molded into patterns to increase its surface area. By increasing the area by up to 60 percent, the researchers have further doubled the power density of a fuel cell. Joseph DeSimone, the UNC-Chapel Hill chemistry and chemical engineering professor who heads the lab where the work was done, thinks they can increase the membrane's surface area 20 to 40 times by using different patterns, increasing the power density proportionately.

Such improvements in power density mean that a much smaller fuel cell could provide adequate power for a vehicle. The material is also easier to work with, which should reduce manufacturing costs. It begins as a liquid that can be poured over a patterned mold, something that's not possible with the material now primarily used in membranes, a fluorinated polymer called Nafion made by DuPont, which is solid at room temperature. Once in a mold, the liquid form of the new material is cured with light to form a resilient solid. "Fuel-cell cars are currently ten times as expensive as conventional cars," says James McGrath, chemistry professor at Virginia Tech. "A lot of that is related to processing. If you can simplify the processing, that would be great. Joe [DeSimone]'s liquid processing technique has a lot of potential for fabricating the intricate patterns necessary to produce a fuel cell."

DeSimone says that a clearer idea of potential cost savings from their new material should be available within six months. And he expects that fuel cells using the membrane could be in production within two to three years.

Print

Related Articles

The Atomic Battery

A breakthrough in betavoltaics could mean a 10-year battery life for sensors and medical implants.

Fossilized Policy

Alternative electricity sources are ready; Washington is not.

Making New Energy Sources An Easier 'Cell'

A Mountain View company hopes to make fuel cells more efficient by creating a better electricity conductor, which could mean longer running, battery-powered consumer devices.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Frantz Louis-Jacques)

  • 2141 Days Ago
  • 04/05/2006

Cheaper Fuel Cells

Given the upward spirals of our present energy cost envelop I dont understand the 3 years lag time to producing this new commercially.
Also why is this news not on the front page of the Wall Street Journal or the New York Time or the lead story of the TV network?
What's the catch?

Reply

Guest (Kruelhunter)

  • 2141 Days Ago
  • 04/05/2006

Lag times...

Sir;

Commercial production requires, among other things, suitable infrastructure and clear understanding of regulatory climate.  It is unlikely that anyone is currently in a position to produce this new membrane in large quantity much less to take advantage of the governmental regulations and incentives that might apply.
While I cannot speak for the Times or the alphabet soup television news, as a long time reader I suspect that the Journal's staff realizes that while this new material represents an excellent step forward it does not of itself make fuel cell technology cost competitive with the more mature fossil fuel systems currently in use.
On the other hand, this advance, incremental or otherwise, offers evidence that science rather than religion disguised as environmentalism will provide cleaner energy sources.

Reply

Guest (dd)

  • 2071 Days Ago
  • 06/14/2006

after read the news, a lot of soaps in it.

Reply

peter924

1 Comment

  • 2000 Days Ago
  • 08/24/2006

Re: Lag times...

Dear Guest

Yes, right on for the last paragraph. However, think about how rapidly new technology can be developed, legislated, produced and assimilated if the buying public decides they want it - for whatever reason.

Look at films made in 1992, now look at films made 5-10  years later-spot the mobile phone phenomenon. You can do the same for desktops and VCRs etc. If the automotive users of the world get a fuel cell bug in their ear-Tv coverage-fear of terrorism controlling oil sources- sick of gas prices-for whatever reason, this technology will be whizzing you to work in 5-10 years flat.

There are no substantial problems standing in its way beyond some developmental requirements that are mainly money and not technology based. After all, it's just a car motor not an entire transport network.

Regards
Peter from Brisbane

Reply

Guest (anonymous)

  • 2139 Days Ago
  • 04/07/2006

what is the material

Interesting article, but what is the new material made of? I know what Nafion's structure is, but not this stuff.

Reply

Guest (Simbolic)

  • 2136 Days Ago
  • 04/10/2006

proton exchange membranes

new materials based on tetrafluoroethylene and perfluorinated sulfonated vinyl ethers

Reply

Guest (McClune)

  • 2133 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2006

Ethanol[Sorganol(R)] is a Newer Low Cost Fuel

I have/am developed/ing SorganolR) which we can Produce at Zero Fossil Fuel/Energy Inputs, and at much lower cost >sorganol.com< , it is Totally Renewable, its a completely New Industry trying to implement, LFM

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Dr. B. J. MACRIS)

  • 2074 Days Ago
  • 06/11/2006

Sorganol

I would very much appreciate any information concerning sorganol production.
Your prompt answer would be greatly appreciared.

Thank you in advance

B. J. Macris
Athens, Greece

Reply

Guest (avoelectrix)

  • 1764 Days Ago
  • 04/17/2007

Re: Ethanol[Sorganol(R)] is a Newer Low Cost Fuel

I should be grateful if you could provide me with more info
Regards
Robert B van der Merwe

Reply

Guest (Erich J. Knight)

  • 2131 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2006

Solar H2

The rising curve of increasing efficiency for PV, direct solar to hydrogen, and thermal conversion to electricity is most exciting.

The point is right now I could pay $20 K for a 12% efficient PV array to end my electric bill, in effect prepaying my electric bill for twenty years. If the nano developments in PV's, or direct thermal/electric or photoelectrochemical direct conversion to H2, can double the current efficiency while cutting the price in half, then we are talking $5,000 to be bill free.
Hydrogen Solar sent me their current Tandum Cell numbers @ 10.2% efficiency: $1.50/LB for H2
And they say that a theoretical efficiency of 35% is possible, and a 22% efficiency is realistically achievable, i.e.,... $0.75/LB of H2 which equals $0.049/KWhr equivalent. From what I understand of the direct solar to hydrogen fabrication technology, it is a much greener process, and cheaper that silicon based PVs.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Amyris

PrimeSense

Geron

Facebook

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement