Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Tapping Rocks for Power

Continued from page 1

By Peter Fairley

Thursday, February 23, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The key to its success to date has been painstaking geological analysis, which ensures they position their wells to hit the right rocks. In 1997, after ten years of work, the project demonstrated impressive flow rates, moving brine heated to 140 degrees Centigrade at a rate of 25 liters per second and a depth of 3.6 kilometers. And the resistance was less than half that encountered at Los Alamos.

That positive result emboldened the project's leaders to push their wells deeper, into 200-degree Centigrade granite five kilometers deep -- and last fall they finally turned on the taps. Daniel Fritsch, project coordinator, says the system "could probably do 40 to 50 liters per second" with the addition of pumps that will be installed in the wells this summer -- another kind of technological challenge given the punishing temperatures involved, which few pumps are capable of withstanding. Then the plan is to build a pilot electrical plant by early 2007 to generate 1.5 megawatts, about the same output as one of today's towering wind turbines. But the hot-rock plant won't go idle every time the wind dies down, and should produce about three times more energy per year.

Fritsch says that to cover the cost of its equipment and to generate a profit, however, the project should produce closer to five megawatts. To produce more power, however, they must more than double the flow rate, to around 100 liters/second, which could be a challenge due to the large amount of shaking their blasts cause on the surface. Lawsuits from some disgruntled citizens claiming property damage have limited Fritsch's willingness to use stronger hydraulic blasts. To many local people, though, it seems like much ado about nothing. Local journalist Bernard Stéphan, who lives two kilometers from the project's ground zero, says his home has not been affected by the blasts. And Soultz-sous-Fôrets mayor Alfred Schmitt says "There is no problem."

Nevertheless, instead of using stronger hydraulic blasts to open the rocks further, Fritsch plans to complement the blasting with a new method: pouring acid in the wells. The idea is to dissolve salt deposits in the fractures immediately surrounding the wells. Fritsch says that tests in Italy with acid have improved the functioning of some geothermal wells by a factor of 10.

Peter Fairley is a Technology Review contributing writer based in Paris.

Comments

  • Lawsuits
    If they get a couple broken glasses, pay them.  If they want pain and suffering, emotional distress, turn OFF the power.
    You don't do business with plaintiffs.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (SirLanse)
    02/23/2006
    Posts:1
  • Tapping Rocks for Power
    How deep do they have to go if the brine is heated to 140F, and then used to heat a gas that boils at alower temperature. I recall reading about ocean driven generators that leveraged the ambient seawater temps to drive a freon gas driven motor back in the early 70's. The pilot site was off the Florida coast near cuba I believe.

    Side Question - does anyone have a URL that shows bedrock temps here in the U.S.?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mike)
    02/23/2006
    Posts:1
    • Hot Rocks
      How long before the heat energy is   depleted?
      How is this factored  into the  cost of the  electric power produced?

      singer@sepp.org
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Fred Singer)
      02/23/2006
      Posts:1
    • Hot Rock power
      There is a company here in Australia doing a similar thing, and it looks very promising. They have some good descriptions of how it all works (in theory) on the web site. www.geodynamics.com.au
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (geoff)
      02/24/2006
      Posts:1
      • Hot Rock Power
        Thanks for the link to http://www.geodynamics.com.au (trying to liven the link), which explains that certain granites are hot due to radioactive decay and an overburden of insulating rock.

        I am still unclear about how long the heat can be removed from a system of well before the stored heat is depleted.  What is the lifetime of one of these wells?  Does heat flow in from the neighboring rock?  If so it would limit how close together well could be sited.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Ted Anderson)
        02/24/2006
        Posts:1
  • hot rock power
    How much energy is being spend to get the 1.5 MW plant working?
    What's the efficiency of the entire enterprise?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Emanuel)
    02/27/2006
    Posts:1
  • the numbers don't add up
    If the fluid is cooled down from 140C to 40C, and if they do this at 25 l.s-1, and the fluid's specific heat is 4,200 J.K-1.l-1 (like that of water), they should be gaining 25 * 4200 * 100 = 10.5e6W, i.e. 10.5 megawatts. If they only plan to output 1.5 megawatts it means either that the fluid they use has much lower specific heat than water, or that they have massive energy costs in pumping the fluid and converting the heat into electricity.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (jh)
    04/27/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.