Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Lithium Economy

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

TR: We've heard about all-electric cars for some time, but so far they haven't panned out -- you can't get very far on a single charge, for example. What has happened in battery development that makes you think this will change?

DS: There was a lot of trial and error with good rules of thumb. But there's far too many possibilities, and that's where [MIT materials science professor] Gerbrand Ceder came in, who was using the principles of quantum mechanics to predict the principles of compounds yet unsynthesized. With Gerbrand's computational materials science, we were able to identify compounds previously ignored in this application.

TR: How good can batteries get?

DS: I think we could easily double [the energy capacity of] what we have right now. We have cells in the lab that, if you run the numbers for a thin-film cell of reasonable size, you end up with two to three times current lithium ion [batteries].

But there's more. The fantasy of all fantasies is chromium. If we could stabilize chromium [as a material for battery cathodes] and I could...give you a battery with 600–700 watts per kilogram [of energy capacity] with reasonable drain rate, that says good-bye hydrogen economy.

TR: You've driven an electric car before. What was that like?

DS: I opened the sun roof, rolled down the windows, and I pulled out. It was like a magic carpet. You hear people laughing, talking, and you're interacting with the city. I returned the vehicle to the fellow at Boston Edison, and I came back here and said, "I've got to work harder. I've got to make this thing happen." The only reason that car isn't everywhere: it couldn't go more than 70 miles on a charge. But you make it 270, game over. Anybody who drives it will never go back to internal combustion.

TR: What's next?

DS: What we need to understand better is systems. Up to now we've been asking, "What makes the best polymer electrolyte?" and then we test it against some cathode and some anode. We need to understand what happens when we put the battery together.

Let's keep the research going. Let's use the phrase that they used in the early days of nuclear power -- "I want this stuff too cheap to meter." I want these batteries so cheap you can give them away. We've got a long way to go, but we've got to work at it.

Comments

  • The Lithium Economy
    I found the article very interesting.  However, to make the statement: &quotthe rest doesn’t make a damn bit of difference if 25 years from now the general temperature of the United States is 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher and the oceans are four feet [higher].&quot is a bit over-stated.  As a reader I would find the information in the article more appealing if these type of off-handed remarks were not thrown in.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Vincent Gaetano)
    11/22/2005
    Posts:1
    • Electricity Source
      I understand the stance on the expense of hydrogen catalysts. But what about the source of the eletricity to charge these batteries? Is he counting on nuclear fusion to power the electrical grid? Otherwise, we are just pumping out more greenhouse gases from coal-powered plants.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Glen Rains)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
    • The Lithium Economy by Vincent Gaetano
      The beauty of electricity is that it can be produced from a multitude of sources, ultra clean to ultra dirty and it can be produced locally (household solar panels being an example of one source) to centrally (gas, coal or nuclear plants).  We lose upwards of 50% of power generated at central powerplants through pumping losses to get it to your home for consumption.  Batteries can help cut this loss significantly by providing reserve power at point of use which can buffer against strong demand during peak loads.  There are HUGE savings that can be reaped by not constructing facilities to meet peak requirements.
      Also, dont even get me started on how I feel about driving a car whose principal powerplant was a derivate of a steam engine invented in the 1800s.  What ever happened to the simple Wankel, or the Stirling engines, much less the electic? Were so wedded to ancient technology that its not funny.  No wonder were losing market share in almost everything.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
    • Electricity Source
      I understand the stance on the expense of hydrogen catalysts. But what about the source of the eletricity to charge these batteries? Is he counting on nuclear fusion to power the electrical grid? Otherwise, we are just pumping out more greenhouse gases from coal-powered plants.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Glen Rains)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
    • The Lithium Economy by Vincent Gaetano
      The beauty of electricity is that it can be produced from a multitude of sources, ultra clean to ultra dirty and it can be produced locally (household solar panels being an example of one source) to centrally (gas, coal or nuclear plants).  We lose upwards of 50% of power generated at central powerplants through pumping losses to get it to your home for consumption.  Batteries can help cut this loss significantly by providing reserve power at point of use which can buffer against strong demand during peak loads.  There are HUGE savings that can be reaped by not constructing facilities to meet peak requirements.
      Also, dont even get me started on how I feel about driving a car whose principal powerplant was a derivate of a steam engine invented in the 1800s.  What ever happened to the simple Wankel, or the Stirling engines, much less the electic? Were so wedded to ancient technology that its not funny.  No wonder were losing market share in almost everything.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
  • The litiumeconomy thoughts
    Assuming a near perfect battery, has anybody looked at the amount of green gas that will still be coming from the unility power plants (the source of the recharging current).

    It seems we are going from many small decentralized sources of polution (gasoline engines) to few large centralized sources of polution (Utility stations).  I havent done the arithmetic, but is the former way better??

    Regards,
    Marvin
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Marvin Milewits)
    11/22/2005
    Posts:1
    • Lithium Economy
      Placing pollution controls on a coal or oil or gas fired electrical plant is far easier and cheaper than placing them on millions of vehicles. Owners of these plants are people just like you and me and when they understand the economic benefits of placing these controls on their plants then they do it. We have cleaner plants today than fifty years ago and they can get even cleaner.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Marcos Mendez)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
      • Lithium Economy
        If cars use, say 30 times the energy of houses, then how many more power plants will have to be built?  And what about the CO2 emmissions from theses plants?

        Well have to move people far more efficiently, and probably less, and power plants will have to be far more efficient than now and use non-fossil fuel such as nuclear (proliferation risk) or renewables (i.e. solar in its various incarnations).
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Bill Gilwood)
        11/22/2005
        Posts:1
        • Didnt like my message?
          Anyone seen the Tzero, which does 300 miles on &quotold&quot Lithium tech?
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Ryan Fulcher)
          11/26/2005
          Posts:1
          • oops, perhaps I got the security code wrong.
            Well lost the lengthy post I made...  Safice it to say that even old lithium technology is probably capable of entering the vehicle market, so long as safty issues are addressed.  New lithium tech is great and will allow for smaller more powerfull packs suted for hybrids.  This may mean that Plug-in Hybrids are further delayed as theres not much use in charging a small sub 1 kWh battery.  Although perhaps the freedom of Lithium over the restrictions of current NiMH IP will allow for larger capacity cells to be &quotlegally&quot produced for vehicle applications.  Anyway, I rather enjoy the little 10Ah 96 cell Li-ion pack I built for my 24v scooter, and many other Li based EVs are out there strutting their stuff, Im encouraged...
            http://www.seattleeva.org/wiki/Li#BEVs_using_Lithium
            Rate this comment: 12345
            Guest (Ryan Fulcher)
            11/26/2005
            Posts:1
          • oops, perhaps I got the security code wrong.
            Well lost the lengthy post I made...  Safice it to say that even old lithium technology is probably capable of entering the vehicle market, so long as safty issues are addressed.  New lithium tech is great and will allow for smaller more powerfull packs suted for hybrids.  This may mean that Plug-in Hybrids are further delayed as theres not much use in charging a small sub 1 kWh battery.  Although perhaps the freedom of Lithium over the restrictions of current NiMH IP will allow for larger capacity cells to be &quotlegally&quot produced for vehicle applications.  Anyway, I rather enjoy the little 10Ah 96 cell Li-ion pack I built for my 24v scooter, and many other Li based EVs are out there strutting their stuff, Im encouraged...
            http://www.seattleeva.org/wiki/Li#BEVs_using_Lithium
            Rate this comment: 12345
            Guest (Ryan Fulcher)
            11/26/2005
            Posts:1
        • Didnt like my message?
          Anyone seen the Tzero, which does 300 miles on &quotold&quot Lithium tech?
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Ryan Fulcher)
          11/26/2005
          Posts:1
      • Lithium Economy
        If cars use, say 30 times the energy of houses, then how many more power plants will have to be built?  And what about the CO2 emmissions from theses plants?

        Well have to move people far more efficiently, and probably less, and power plants will have to be far more efficient than now and use non-fossil fuel such as nuclear (proliferation risk) or renewables (i.e. solar in its various incarnations).
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Bill Gilwood)
        11/22/2005
        Posts:1
    • reply to Marvin Melewits
      First if we go from many cars to a few power plants that is a plus because a few power plants are a lot easier to make efficient and clean that a couple million cars.  Second, electricity can be produced by clean methods.  Solar, Wind, Wave, Cleaner Coal.  Your question is a very common question and through the research and comments from different envirnment experts that I have read I believe that it will be very benificial to get off of fossil fuels and on to Plug in Hybrid vehicles.  Check out calcars.org for more info.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (paul)
      11/27/2005
      Posts:1
    • Lithium Economy
      Placing pollution controls on a coal or oil or gas fired electrical plant is far easier and cheaper than placing them on millions of vehicles. Owners of these plants are people just like you and me and when they understand the economic benefits of placing these controls on their plants then they do it. We have cleaner plants today than fifty years ago and they can get even cleaner.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Marcos Mendez)
      11/22/2005
      Posts:1
    • reply to Marvin Melewits
      First if we go from many cars to a few power plants that is a plus because a few power plants are a lot easier to make efficient and clean that a couple million cars.  Second, electricity can be produced by clean methods.  Solar, Wind, Wave, Cleaner Coal.  Your question is a very common question and through the research and comments from different envirnment experts that I have read I believe that it will be very benificial to get off of fossil fuels and on to Plug in Hybrid vehicles.  Check out calcars.org for more info.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (paul)
      11/27/2005
      Posts:1
  • Lithium vs Hydrogen
    How do plants break the H2 bond?  I doubt they need precious metals.  If they can do it, we can do it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Grant Callaghan)
    11/29/2005
    Posts:1
    • Response to Grant Callaghan
      The easy answer is that they use a powerplant thousands of times the scale of an automotive powerplant. Scale and cost issues are too prohibitive to make a Tu Quoque sort of statement about power capability.  Also, I'm fairly sure you don't want your car's powerplant to cost approximately $20 million.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bunsen)
      06/23/2006
      Posts:1
  • Lithum ion breakthrough
    Vulvox Nano/biotechnology Corporation is devloping a lithium ion battery that builds upon technology devloped at a DOE lab
    that will be capapble of storing
    3.9 amps per kg. And we are working on designs that will be able to charge up to maximum capapcity in under ten minutes and keep that charge indifinitely. Altair has released datat about a low capacity cell that charges in five minutes but it loses its charge completely wo days.

    We expect our battery to compete sucessfully with Alatirs product and with fuel cells enabling construction of all electric vehicles with long range travel capabilities and of course, laptops that go much longer before
    they require a recharge.
    Investors and Corporatios that want a partnership are encouraged to contact Neil Farbstein at 516-921-5058
    or at protn7@att.net
    Our lithium ion battery prohgram is featured on our webpage at
    http://vulvoxnanobio.tripod.com
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Neil Farbstein)
    01/04/2006
    Posts:1
  • The Lithium Economy
    I found the article very interesting.  However, to make the statement: &quotthe rest doesn’t make a damn bit of difference if 25 years from now the general temperature of the United States is 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher and the oceans are four feet [higher].&quot is a bit over-stated.  As a reader I would find the information in the article more appealing if these type of off-handed remarks were not thrown in.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Vincent Gaetano)
    11/22/2005
    Posts:1
  • The litiumeconomy thoughts
    Assuming a near perfect battery, has anybody looked at the amount of green gas that will still be coming from the unility power plants (the source of the recharging current).

    It seems we are going from many small decentralized sources of polution (gasoline engines) to few large centralized sources of polution (Utility stations).  I havent done the arithmetic, but is the former way better??

    Regards,
    Marvin
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Marvin Milewits)
    11/22/2005
    Posts:1
  • Lithium vs Hydrogen
    How do plants break the H2 bond?  I doubt they need precious metals.  If they can do it, we can do it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Grant Callaghan)
    11/29/2005
    Posts:1
  • Lithum ion breakthrough
    Vulvox Nano/biotechnology Corporation is devloping a lithium ion battery that builds upon technology devloped at a DOE lab
    that will be capapble of storing
    3.9 amps per kg. And we are working on designs that will be able to charge up to maximum capapcity in under ten minutes and keep that charge indifinitely. Altair has released datat about a low capacity cell that charges in five minutes but it loses its charge completely wo days.

    We expect our battery to compete sucessfully with Alatirs product and with fuel cells enabling construction of all electric vehicles with long range travel capabilities and of course, laptops that go much longer before
    they require a recharge.
    Investors and Corporatios that want a partnership are encouraged to contact Neil Farbstein at 516-921-5058
    or at protn7@att.net
    Our lithium ion battery prohgram is featured on our webpage at
    http://vulvoxnanobio.tripod.com
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Neil Farbstein)
    01/04/2006
    Posts:1
  • Energy storage vs Hydrogen
    It has never made much sense to me why we don't expore much further, the huge potential for all electric modes of transportation.  Further, is it possible to use recent advances in photovoltaics to help reduce loads or build nano based rechargeable materials that also serve the automobile's infrastructure?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mike Cloutier)
    03/20/2006
    Posts:1
  • Nuclear Proliferation
    The proliferation risk has been solved -- it is called the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor. In principle you can get this thing to burn Thorium which is fertile.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Todd Gruhn)
    05/17/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.