The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Self-contained power plants could supply growing energy demand in poor countries.
Now more than ever, the world needs nuclear energy, says this year's Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Mohamed ElBaradei. In a talk at MIT last week he cited a new report from the International Energy Agency that said world energy demand will increase by 50 percent in the next 25 years. Meanwhile, carbon dioxide emissions, which are a leading cause of global warming, will increase by the same percentage. Nuclear power could provide a significant amount of that power, without producing the carbon dioxide, says ElBaradei.
It's an argument that's attracting more and more proponents these days. But traditional nuclear power plants are very expensive to build, which can be a serious obstacle to their construction in poor countries. One solution being proposed, according to ElBaradei, is to build hundreds of small nuclear power plants, each designed to serve a single town. Such plants could be built for a fraction of the cost of the current large-scale regional ones. And they could be installed without the need to also build an extensive and expensive power grid. As a country's energy needs grow, more plants can be added to keep up. Such plants might also be a good solution for remote communities.
A countryside dotted with hundreds of small reactors might seem like a safety and nuclear proliferation nightmare. But, according to ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, they can be built with safeguards against meltdowns and theft of materials by would-be terrorists.
Researchers at Argonne National Laboratory in Argonne, IL, described a concept for such a small-scale reactor this summer. One of the safeguards is a passive cooling system, which continues to work even if power goes down. The reactors could also operate for 30 years without refueling, which would mean fewer deliveries that could be hijacked. And stealing the fuel while it was in the reactor would require bringing to the site extensive heavy equipment, which would be easily visible by satellite, according to David Wade, senior technical advisor at Argonne and one of the developers of the concept.
"It's good to have a reactor that requires a minimum of maintenance and refueling" for remote locations in some situations, says Mujid Kazimi, a nuclear engineer at MIT. He says that similar small reactors are under development in Argentina and Brazil, and Toshiba has recently offered to build one for an Alaskan town.
The Argonne concept uses a reactor cooled by liquid lead that allows for high operating temperatures and efficient use of the fuel, which is programmed to produce energy slowly over the 30-year cycle. The lead coolant also circulates without the need for the expensive back-up diesel generators required by today's plants. "If it is built correctly, it will be able to be cooled by natural convection alone," says Kazimi, who was not part of the concept development team.
Guest (guven yalcintas)
I think it is an excellent idea, but Nuclear plant is a very complex system that requires number of groups with diferent expertise such as engineers, health physics people, management, power etc. To accomodate all these needs even as a group of reactors still requires that small country to spend a huge effort to build. Good as a dream, but reality requires much more. I wish it was real.
Guest (James Aach)
US nuke plants, a novel approach, Stewart Brand endorsed
In May 2005 in a Technology Review article, Stewart Brand called for a re-evaluation of nuclear power. Mr. Brand has since endorsed a techno-thriller novel about the American nuclear power industry, written by a longtime nuclear engineer (me). This book provides an entertaining and accurate portrait of the US nuclear industry today and how a nuclear accident would be handled. It is called “Rad Decision”, and is found at RadDecision.blogspot.com. There is no cost to readers.
“Id like to see RAD DECISION widely read.” - - Stewart Brand.
http://RadDecision.blogspot.com
(sb quote used with permission)
Guest (da)
however, why does a technology magazine allow an article to start with the non-scientific comment that "CO2 emissions are a leading cause of global warming"? while there is a clear but slight warming trend, the cause remains very much unclear. placing that statement in an article in such a well-known and well-thought-of tech pub is a criminal misuse.
Guest (CHAZBRO (From the Mars Society))
It appears that that a reactor derived from the technology described herein would be suitable for powersources in space for lunar basas and manned deep space probes. Has anyone explored this possibility?
Guest (guven yalcintas)
I think it is an excellent idea, but Nuclear plant is a very complex system that requires number of groups with diferent expertise such as engineers, health physics people, management, power etc. To accomodate all these needs even as a group of reactors still requires that small country to spend a huge effort to build. Good as a dream, but reality requires much more. I wish it was real.
Guest (James Aach)
US nuke plants, a novel approach, Stewart Brand endorsed
In May 2005 in a Technology Review article, Stewart Brand called for a re-evaluation of nuclear power. Mr. Brand has since endorsed a techno-thriller novel about the American nuclear power industry, written by a longtime nuclear engineer (me). This book provides an entertaining and accurate portrait of the US nuclear industry today and how a nuclear accident would be handled. It is called “Rad Decision”, and is found at RadDecision.blogspot.com. There is no cost to readers.
“Id like to see RAD DECISION widely read.” - - Stewart Brand.
http://RadDecision.blogspot.com
(sb quote used with permission)
Guest (da)
however, why does a technology magazine allow an article to start with the non-scientific comment that "CO2 emissions are a leading cause of global warming"? while there is a clear but slight warming trend, the cause remains very much unclear. placing that statement in an article in such a well-known and well-thought-of tech pub is a criminal misuse.
We can remove the risk of weapons development under a screen of producing nuclear power (Iran, for instance) by having the US or the UN finance, sell, or even gift fueled and sealed nuclear reactors. A sort of World Electrification Program.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Guest (CHAZBRO (From the Mars Society))
Space applications
It appears that that a reactor derived from the technology described herein would be suitable for powersources in space for lunar basas and manned deep space probes. Has anyone explored this possibility?
Reply