The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Making memories: This colorized atomic-force microscopy image shows 17 memristors. The circuit elements, shown in green, are formed at the crossroads of metal nanowires.
StanWilliams, HP Labs
Products featuring memristors could appear in 2013.
An electronic component that offers a new way to squeeze more data into computers and portable gadgets is set to go into production in just a couple of years. Hewlett-Packard announced today that it has entered an agreement with the Korean electronics manufacturer Hynix Semiconductor to make the components, called "memristors," starting in 2013. Storage devices made of memristors will allow PCs, cellphones, and servers to store more and switch on instantly.
Memristors are nanoscale electronic switches that have a variable resistance, and can retain their resistance even when the power is switched off. This makes them similar to the transistors used to store data in flash memory. But memristors are considerably smaller--as small as three nanometers. In contrast, manufacturers are experimenting with flash memory components that are 20 nanometers in size.
"The goal is to be at least double whatever flash memory is in three years--we know we'll beat flash in speed, power, and endurance, and we want to beat it in density, too," says Stanley Williams, a senior fellow at HP who has been developing memristors in his lab for about five years.
HP makes memristors by laying down parallel metal nanowires onto a substrate, coating them with a layer of titanium dioxide, and placing a second layer of nanowires perpendicular to the first layer. Where the wires cross, a memristor is formed. HP expects the first devices containing memristors to offer about 20 gigabytes of storage per square centimeter, twice the projected capacity of flash at this time. The company has dubbed memristor-based data storage "ReRAM", which stands for Resistive Random Access Memory.
Like other silicon technologies, flash memory is approaching the physical limits of what's possible in miniaturization. Flash memory also wears out after about 100,000 read-write cycles (longer than the lifetime of most gadgets), while lab tests have shown that memristors can withstand up to about a million read-write cycles.
Under the terms of the new agreement, HP will maintain the intellectual property related to memristors. Hynix will make and sell memristor memory to HP and other customers. Williams says the company's goal is to encourage the industry to adopt memristor memory. "The economic benefit to HP will be as the first mover," says Jim McGregor, chief technology strategist at industry analyst firm InStat.
Displacing flash could still take years and billions of dollars, and the industry has other experimental kinds of memory to consider, notes McGregor. Researchers are working on phase-change and ferroelectric materials that can make new forms of memory. McGregor believes that, given the likelihood of speed bumps in manufacturing, it's unlikely a commercial memristor product will be available in 2013, as HP and Hynix predict.
But Williams does not foresee any major manufacturing hurdles. He says HP has been working for the past year on prototype devices with an undisclosed semiconductor manufacturer. Williams adds that memristors can be made with materials and machinery already present in semiconductor factories.
Dan Olds, a consultant with Gabriel Consulting Group in Beaverton, Oregon, is optimistic about the technology. "The sky's the limit if they can deliver on the promise of memristors--the question is at what price, and how fast prices will come down," he says. "Any new technology is a crapshoot, but if it's a matter of engineering and not basic research, then you feel more confident betting on it."
1) Thanks for the interesting article. Imagine the energy (and CO2 emission) savings if all PCs turned on "instantly."
2) What are the access speeds? Specifically: how long does it take to locate a starting memory location (average seek time), and how fast can it then transfer big contiguous chunks (read rate and write rate)? These are also important parameters for memories. As an extreme example, if meRAM were so slow that it took 10 minutes to access 4 GB, then that would obviously kill its use for an "instant on" PC, regardless of how dense and cheap it might be.
It is my understanding from past articles that due to the simplicity of the design both read and write speeds will be much faster than any of the flash memory technologies currently in production. And although the initial chips may store only one bit per memresistor. Future devices depending on how stable HP can make them store much more. And as always stacking many chips in paraell like we do with with existing SSD designs will improve things further.
Though this is neat tech I am curious how compatible the process is with existing CMOS logic designs. As this could lead to some sort of super FPGA designs where a CPU could change it's design to fit the task it is performing.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.
View full PDF >Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
huynhbc
17 Comments
Store More Data Head
That's very impressive and I hope the capacity and the life cycle will replace the mechanical Hard Drive someday soon when price got its compatibility.
IMHO.
Reply
rocket7777
124 Comments
Re: Store More Data Head
There is no reason for wishing progress of one thing to stop.
For example, I can imagine 50tb harddrive with 4gb cache. Or harddriveless laptop with 500gb of fast random access storage or nvram.
Reply