The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Much of today's data security rests on encryption techniques involving mathematical functions that are easy to perform but hard to reverse, such as multiplying two large prime numbers. Factoring the result without knowing either of the prime numbers is very difficult, at least for the computers we use today; it could take thousands of years for even the most powerful supercomputer to identify the original numbers and crack an encrypted message.
D-Wave Systems says it is making significant progress toward developing quantum-computer hardware, such as this chip.
Courtesy of D-Wave Systems
The task would be a snap for a quantum computer, however. (In these computers, a bit need not be just a 0 or a 1; it can exist in an infinite number of intermediate states.) A practical quantum computer is probably at least decades away, but simple demonstrations have already been made. Some researchers warn that such a computer would herald the death of encryption and expose not just new information but also preëxisting material encrypted in the expectation that it would stay secret indefinitely. Imagine if it became possible in 20 years to read electronic medical records being created today.
Alternative systems are being proposed. Lattice-based encryption, for example, relies on the difficulty of determining such things as the shortest vector possible in a given multidimensional lattice; that can be so hard it would stump even a quantum computer. Even though such a computer may not be available for many years, if ever, it's important to begin developing and deploying better cryptography now so it has time to diffuse throughout cyberspace.
Asymmetrical decryption becomes a time/key length linear problem with quantic computers.
When knowing IBM created a 350GHz x86 processor years ago, it's possible these quantic computers actually already exist. Depending on who makes use of these, they could be compromising now the very base of electronic trust.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.
View full PDF >Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
mattgroom
286 Comments
my goodness
What does it matter if the encryption rate increases with the decryption rate. The information for the most part is released into public domain after a certain period, so it would be handy if its cracked at a proportional rate.
Unbeatable encryption has existed for decades so im not sure what youre dribbling on about. Its just used sparingly and for specific reasons.
If you want a mass-used easy full-proof encryption..youre having a laugh because for one thing governments wont allow it....
Reply