The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Apple’s iPad
Apple
Anticipating the ever-increasing computing demands of tomorrow's mobile devices, chip makers are rolling out compact designs for processors that boost performance while drawing less battery power.
Designing processors for mobile devices requires more than simply reproducing desktop computer architecture in a smaller device. The tinier transistors get, the more electricity they leak, a killer for battery-powered devices. To address this problem, Intel has incorporated better insulating materials into its current generation of chips, and IBM's chips will soon have a honeycomb design with empty spaces--because a vacuum is the best insulator of all.
Another strategy is to package multiple processing units on the same chip, a technology called multicore computing. Instead of, say, a single power-hungry two-gigahertz chip, two energy-efficient, one-gigahertz cores could deliver the same performance. But programming multicore processors effectively can be tricky (see "Multicore Processors Create Software Headaches").

Packaging specialized systems with a general-purpose core can also be a way to boost performance for specific mobile applications, such as handling multimedia. Apple used this approach for its iPad tablet computer, creating a custom chip called the A4 to power the device. Qualcomm, Intel, and IBM are each taking this idea a step further by working on designs for three-dimensional chips with multiple layers of circuitry. These designs save energy by shortening the distance bits must travel between, for example, the processor and a memory chip (the longer the path electrons must travel, the more are lost to heat). Qualcomm expects to have such chips in products next year.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.
View full PDF >Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following: