Work with me: NASA and General Motors have developed a humanoid robot called Robonaut2. It is designed to work alongside humans or autonomously.
NASA/GM

Computing

A Giant Leap for Humanoid Kind

NASA and GM are are working on an advanced humanoid robot that could soon hitch a ride into space.

  • Friday, February 12, 2010
  • By Brittany Sauser

The next generation of explorers to walk on the moon or Mars could be called robonauts. They may perform similar scientific tasks to astronauts, but wouldn't require any of the life support equipment or shelter. The first robonaut could travel to the space station to work side by side with astronauts in the next three years, if plans at NASA come to fruition.

NASA and General Motors are developing the first of these humanoid robots, called Robonaut2. Unlike NASA's Mars rovers, Robonaut2 is designed to closely mimic the shape, movement, and behavior of a human. This could make it ideally suited to working alongside humans, or for testing human spacecraft and living quarters, but it also presents some unique engineering challenges. GM hopes to use the robots in its manufacturing plants and to incorporate the resulting technology into some of its products, including vehicle safety systems.

The engineers behind Robonaut2 began working on the robot in 2007; its design originated from a version that NASA created more than 10 years ago.

Robonaut2 currently consists of just an upper torso. It weighs about 45 kilograms and is equipped with over 350 sensors. These include tactile sensors on the contact points of the robot's fingers and its palms, and proximity sensors in its arms. Engineers have also built springs and elastic materials in the joints to give the robot better control and flexibility, and to allow it to move at faster, more humanlike speeds. The robot can carry payloads of about nine kilograms--four times more than other humanoid robots.

Advertisement

Rob Ambrose, chief of the Software, Robotics and Simulation Division at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, says the new robot is a significant improvement over its predecessor. "It's designed to operate at a speed and scale similar to humans, and when it encounters people it complies and safely works with them," he says.

The technology needed to perceive humans and respond to human action is particularly important, and this is something that researchers all over the world are working on, says Matthew Mason, a professor of robotics and computer science at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. Robonaut2 is an important platform for developing and testing such techniques, he adds.

Video

Another key challenge is enabling Robonaut2 to communicate effectively with astronauts. "This is really a new area," adds Bilge Mutlu, an assistant professor in computer science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a member of the human computer interaction lab at CMU. "How does a robot interpret social cues? How does it communicate back? We want robots to be team members, and the new work is a step in that direction." For the moment, Robonaut2 is limited to communicating with humans in simple ways. For example, when it points its head toward something, it is a cue that the human working alongside the robot should look in that direction.

Print

Related Articles

Safer Robots Will Improve Manufacturing

Robots have been considered too unpredictable and dangerous to work alongside humans in factories. Advances in artificial sensing and motion could change that.

Space Laboratory Open for Business

Scientists say they can get better use of the International Space Station now that its construction is complete and operational time extended.

The Year in Robotics

During the past 12 months, robots got better at grasping, smiling, and avoiding angry humans.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

rsole

4 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Missions for the robot?

IMHO the only missions for the Robonaut in the next 10 years will be in the NASA marketing department.
Nice to know about it, anyway.

Reply

gametheoryman

21 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

let robots be robots

This is a nice demonstration project, clearly advancing several robotic technologies, but except as a test "dummies" using a humanoid form seems to make little sense for the stated purposes. Our form is the result of adapting to our Earthly environment given our biological beginnings. We want robotic help in vastly different environments and we can start with a structure unlike existing ones.

Redundancy could distribute the brain throughout the body. Better yet, augment this brain with the much bigger brain possible in the space vehicle with which it can communicate wirelessly.

Once we have the capability of understanding two visual inputs, why stop at two eyes? A set of eyes capable of 360 degree viewing would be quite helpful. Similarly, two arms that only work forward? why not restructured to work backwards too? And four or more legs are clearly more stable than two.

How about senses that we don't have? more of the radiation spectrum? more chemical sensors?

With multiple robots communicating wirelessly, each might use unused parts of another's brain and what one senses, all could know. Maybe more robots that are dumber individually could be better as a unit when working together?

Reply

mkogrady

423 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

I have to ask....

The UAW knows about these things - RIGHT?

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: I have to ask....

Muhahahahaaaa...United Auto Humanoids (UAH) from now on, not UAW.

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Why so human centric?

But why does a robot have to be a "humanoid"?

Why do we need to copy human anatomical features?

Why 2 hands, when you can have 4 or 6 hands?
Why 5 fingers, when you can have 10, 15 etc?

Reply

doanwon

76 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: Why so human centric?

I think this says it all: "... closely mimic the shape, movement, and behavior of a human. This could make it ideally suited to working alongside humans..."

I'm sure they will later add in intelligence and so on so that it is much more interactive with humans.  A humanoid form is easier to read cues from and easier for humans to anticipate its movements.  Imagine if it had another set of arms on its back and you get whacked in the groin as you happen to walk by not knowing what it is about to do.  The head is also convenient in that it lets you know what tasks it is working on when it is looking in that direction.

I am sure they have in mind a very intelligent agent linked into the robot someday.  They are in that direction.  Someday we'll get a servebot like in the movie I-Robot.  Very cool.

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: Why so human centric?

For a household 'servebot' the humanoid shape is necessary. But for NASA missions that is irrelevant.

Reply

Advertisement

rudnric

4 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Re: Why so human centric?

Youre kidding right?  Yeah, NASA missions are *never* designed to hold humans...

Listen, this is intended to work alongside humans.  Like it says in the article.  So having a robot that wasnt humanoid shape would be a tad difficult to use when the environment was made for humans.... why am I even explaining this.  Just delete that fools comment.

Reply

GaryB

119 Comments

  • 731 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2010

Need for humanoids

I think GM isn't interested in the space aspect, they want humanoids to fit into exiting factory infrastructures. Right now, robots in manufacturing require very expensive buildings and set-ups to make them work which severely limits where robots can be used.

Also, though I wouldn't doubt that unions will try to kill this, they would be stupid to do so. The reason robots have displaced humans is often because the robots are too dangerous to work around. Human+robots might make for very flexible and profitable factories long before we get anything near "AI".

Reply

snedunuri

67 Comments

  • 730 Days Ago
  • 02/13/2010

I think perhaps the reason they picked a humanoid shape, besides being familiar, is that evolution picked the shape we have! There's lot of advantages to the humanoid form - being able to balance and walk on just 2 limbs frees up other limbs. There's a height advantage for the same volume, etc. A humanoid shape does not preclude having additional digits on the hand, eyes in the back of the head, or as Hindu gods do, additional limbs!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

PrimeSense

Ushahidi

First Solar

Amazon.com

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement