Computing

Graphene Transistors that Can Work at Blistering Speeds

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Friday, February 5, 2010
  • By Katherine Bourzac

Walter de Heer, a professor of physics at Georgia Tech in Atlanta who pioneered methods used to work with epitaxial graphene, says the IBM device is a milestone because of its speed and because it was made using practical fabrication techniques. "This is not pie-in-the-sky stuff, this is real," he says. "This development is really going to turn into a communications device not too long from now."

"One can apply the same processing technologies to get much closer to a product," says Avouris. Last year, the same IBM group, and an independent group at HRL Laboratories in Malibu, CA, both made 10 gigahertz graphene transistors using an involved method called mechanical exfoliation. This process involves peeling away layers from a small piece of graphite until a single, atom-thick sheet remains, then setting that down on a substrate and carving it to form a transistor. The problem with this approach is that it compromises graphene's electrical properties and is not commercially scalable, says Avouris.

The first applications of graphene transistors will likely be as switches and amplifiers in analog military electronics. Indeed, the IBM group's work is supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. But the researchers say it will be years before the company begins commercial development on carbon electronics.

De Heer notes that the IBM devices don't yet realize graphene's full potential. By carefully controlling the growing conditions, his group has made graphene that conducts electrons 10 times faster than the material used by the IBM team. This higher-quality graphene could, in theory, be used to make transistors that reach terahertz speeds, though de Heer says many things could go wrong during scale-up.

Avouris says the IBM team will work to improve its transistors' speed by miniaturizing them. The ones it has made so far are 240 nanometers long, which is relatively large--silicon electronic components are down to about 20 nanometers. Avouris also believes that their performance could be improved by making the insulating layer thinner. "The next step is to try and integrate these transistors into a truly operational circuit," he says.

Print

Related Articles

Flash Memory That'll Keep On Shrinking

Using atom-thick carbon instead of silicon could pack ever more data into portable electronics.

Speedier Cell Phone Circuitry

IBM has shown graphene could replace other materials in circuits that handle wireless signals.

The Year in Materials

Wonder material graphene wins Nobel Prize, flexible electronics head to market, and advances hint at the future of displays.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

bendib

1 Comment

  • 729 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

And I was waiting for the 4Ghz CPU! 50Ghz Core i7,000, here I come!

Reply

metinmsm

2 Comments

  • 729 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

Give credit to HRL Laboratories

IBM shourl give credit to HRL Laboratories since IBM copied HRL's approach of growing graphene on SiC, (and abondoned their impractical peeled off grahphene sheets) to reach 100 GHz result.

Reply

3p141592654

1 Comment

  • 729 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

InP only works at low temperatures?  Sheesh, someone should proofread these articles so that nonsense like this doesn't get published.

Reply

DennisBuller

118 Comments

  • 729 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2010

Power Usage?

  What type of power does this transistor use compared to a mosphet transistor?
  Speed means nothing if it drains the battery dry in 5 minutes....

Reply

lordsavethee

5 Comments

  • 599 Days Ago
  • 06/15/2010

Attn. Katherine Bourzac

Please reference the original papers.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Taking a Measurement
Learn how to use your PC to take measurements

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

BUILD VERSUS BUY
Understanding the Total Cost of Embedded Design

National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

Windows on an iPad

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

A123 Systems

Crowdcast

Layar

ARM Holdings

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement