Computing

A New Breed of Laser TV

Laser phosphor displays promise efficiency and simple manufacturing.

  • Wednesday, January 20, 2010
  • By Kate Greene

New display concepts are a dime a dozen. However, very few of them find their way beyond prototype stage, and even if they do, they usually can't compete with the manufacturing muscle of the $100 billion liquid crystal display (LCD) industry. But a display startup called Prysm believes that its technology, called laser phosphor display (LPD), has the perfect combination of picture quality, energy efficiency, and manufacturing simplicity to have a chance of breaking through.

The San Jose-based Prysm, which came out of stealth mode last week, has been getting plenty of media attention due to its claims of energy efficiency. According to Roger Hajjar, the company's chief technology officer, an LPD consumes a fourth of the power of a liquid crystal display with the same brightness and about a tenth of the power of a plasma screen (although an LPD also shines brighter than a plasma screen, so the comparison isn't direct, according to Hajjar).

"The physics is simple," says Hajjar. In other displays, he says, "the light source is mostly on and there's a threshold power requirement even to keep the screen black." In an LPD, he says, the lasers get to rest where the screen is dark, saving power.

The concept behind LPD is relatively straightforward. Beams of light from several ultra-violet lasers are directed by a set of movable mirrors onto a screen made of a plastic-glass hybrid material coated with color phosphor stripes. The laser draws an image onto the screen by scanning line by line from top to bottom. The energy from the laser light activates the phosphor, which emits photons, producing an image.

Advertisement

An LPD differs significantly from a LCD, in which a backlight, made of either white LEDs or a cold-cathode florescent light, shines through layers of optics, including color filters and liquid crystals, to produce an image. More than 90 percent of the original light is lost in this process. Another competitor, plasma display technology, consists of small cells of ionized gases that emit light--a process that requires a relatively large amount of power. And a conventional laser television, such as the LaserVue, made by Mitsubishi, uses red, blue, and green lasers and a micromirror device that combines and directs the light. This is essentially a rear-projection display, but because of its high price tag, it hasn't become widely popular.

Crucially, Hajjar says, larger LPDs are also energy efficient compared to today's larger displays, such as electronic billboards. Compared to an LED billboard, where each diode is a pixel, an LPD of the same size and brightness eats up only about a tenth of the power, since fewer lasers are used compared to the number of LEDs required for the billboard.

Print

Related Articles

Making OLED Displays Cheaper

A startup's printing equipment could make high-performance OLED televisions cheaper.

Stretchable Displays

An elastic conductor makes possible cheap, conformable displays.

Color Quantum-Dot Displays

A new way to print quantum dots could lead to brighter, more power-efficient displays.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

XOR

3 Comments

  • 753 Days Ago
  • 01/23/2010

No moving parts please

A nice idea but sadly it sounds like this technology might not have very bright future. It has same problems as CRT (thickness, beam alignment, convergence, temperature drifts, flicker etc) plus few more, including problematic lifetime of the mechanical fast scanning mirror. Even CRT doesn't have moving parts and beam is steered by magnetic field coils that never wear out.

The future display will be flat and will not have moving parts. Instead of steered UV laser, think of UV-LED behind every phosphor pixel.

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 750 Days Ago
  • 01/26/2010

Re: No moving parts please

power semiconductors used in these sets aren't exactly reliable for long periods either.  and this is because the moving parts are the semiconductor doping atoms.

It is so bad that consumer agencies actually suggest you DO get a warranty with large LCD TVs.  Not due to the LCD wearing out but the power electronics.  I've seen consumer review sites filled with horror stories of these parts breaking on major brands.  Often right after purchase, and repeatedly after replacement.

And then they can't be repaired because it is more profitable to sell new units than stock parts for models that are quickly replaced with new models.   So having a warranty may mean they can't fix it but will give you a new unit.

I've had my old mitsubishi CRT tv for 15 years.  But consumer sites say treat LCD and plasma TVs like disposables - once they break, every 3 to 5 years you need to replace it.  Sorry, not my bag to pander to planned obsolescence.

As for the moving mirror, this is well known technology, used in many digital projectors.  TI makes a micro-mirror chip.  On this scale is likely much more reliable than large moving parts.

Reply

Mergatroid Mania

3 Comments

  • 407 Days Ago
  • 01/04/2011

Re: No moving parts please

I have been working on TVs and display technologies for over 20 years. During the CRT days, you're right. The MOSFETs in the geometry circuits of computer monitors, and the horizontal output transistors were common faults. However, they were under larger current loads than what you have in current LCD TVs (especially those using LED back lights).

In LCD TVs today, I hardly ever come across TVs with bad semi conductors. 99.99% of the time, faults are caused by capacitors, transformers (on inverter boards), backlights (CCFL) or the actual LCD layer in the panel. I cannot agree with your commend that semiconductors are the main reliability problem in LCD TVs.

Reply

Mergatroid Mania

3 Comments

  • 407 Days Ago
  • 01/04/2011

Re: No moving parts please

I have to agree with your assessment of the mirrors. Although TI has been using a similar method in projectors for years, those projectors are not usually used to the extent people use a TV and do not get the operational hours that a TV must be able to withstand. I have no problem with the thickness (anything under 10" for a 65" Laser TV would be fine with me (re: Mitsubishi 65" Laser TV)), and the alignment should also not be an issue considering we are talking about HD displays and lasers, not SD displays and clunky old electron beam alignment (even in high resolution expensive CRT displays it was tough to align the electron gun perfectly, and sometimes impossible).
However, I have just seen an LG 31" OLED TV that (supposedly) will be available sometime during 2011 at a price of $10k. I would put my money on OLED (at 3mm thick, who wouldn't want one?).

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Facebook

Twitter

Life Technologies

Amyris

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement