Computing

More Efficient Space Engine Uses Carbon Nanotubes

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Tuesday, December 8, 2009
  • By Brittany Sauser

Better thrust: A carbon nanotube cathode is mounted on an experimental setup inside an ion thruster.
Georgia Institute of Technology

"The examination of carbon nanotubes for cathodes is a relatively new approach, but one of several that has been investigated over the last decade," says Michael Patterson, the principal investigator of the new ion-propulsion system that's part of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) program. Researchers at NASA's Glenn Research Center have investigated the use of microstructures made of diamond-like materials, but have had difficulty using them. "Generally they have a short lifetime when subjected to erosive environments or run at very low currents," says Patterson.

To create the carbon-nanotube cathodes, the Georgia Tech researchers grow the multiwalled carbon nanotubes using plasma instead of conventional chemical vapor deposition. "We need to be able to finely control the height of the carbon nanotubes, which for our design is 10 microns," says Ready.

Busek, a space propulsion company based in Natick, MA, is also developing carbon-nanotube cathodes that are already space-certified. Ready says the researchers have a good relationship with the company and would be interested in working with it to commercialize their own technology.

The Georgia Tech researchers have demonstrated the durability of their carbon nanotubes by showing they can survive the vibrations experienced during launch. The nanotubes have a lifespan of over 368 hours. The group has received a $6.5 million grant from DARPA, the research and development arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, and have begun a second phase of testing.

"Carbon nanotubes are a worthy area of research that could improve the overall system performance," says Patterson. He adds that carbon-nanotube cathodes may be most suitable for low-power spacecraft and small satellites because the standard cathode technology is most prohibiting on these systems. "A large fraction of the propellant is wasted on the cathode."

Print

Related Articles

A New Twist on Artificial Muscles

Carbon nanotube yarns produce as much torque as an electric motor.

Private Space Technology Powers Up

Former astronaut Franklin Chang Diaz says the private sector can help NASA, and reckons he has the rocket to prove it.

A More Efficient Spacecraft Engine

NASA's new ion-propulsion system could be ready for launch as soon as 2013.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Gaetano Marano

246 Comments

  • 799 Days Ago
  • 12/08/2009

>>> nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes >>>

.

nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes...

the scientific (and non-scientific) Press is FULL of "nanotubes" but WHEN we will FINALLY see something REAL based on these "nanotubes" ???

.

Reply

gtse1300

2 Comments

  • 792 Days Ago
  • 12/15/2009

Re: >>> nanotubes, nanotubes, nanotubes >>>

Gaetano, Good morning. I think that all of us are looking for some postive advancements, but these things take time and mistakes....and sometimes the mistakes are more fruitful then the poof of concepts.

Reply

ms

190 Comments

  • 799 Days Ago
  • 12/08/2009

garbled description?

"[a Hall effect thruster] ionizes gas electrons trapped in a magnetic field"
perhaps should say "ionizes gas using electrons trapped in a magnetic field"?

"Existing Hall Effect thrusters must use about 10 percent of the spacecraft's xenon gas propellant to create the electrons needed to both run the engine and neutralize the ion beam."
What is this trying to say? All the electrons stripped from the xenon during ionization must be returned to the accelerated xenon ions in order to keep the spacecraft electrically neutral. So does 10 percent of the (neutral) xenon leak away without being accelerated? If so, what is the mechanism and how does the nanotube cathode help?

Reply

Brittany Sauser

46 Comments

  • 799 Days Ago
  • 12/08/2009

Re: garbled description?

ms,

Yes, it is "using" the electrons to ionize the gas.

Of the total amount of gas onboard the spacecraft, 10 percent of it must be used to create, or make, the electrons, so essentially you are "wasting" propellant, which could be used to extend the spacecraft's lifetime (as the article states). Carbon-nanotube cathodes do not need any gas to make electrons, so you have ten percent more of the gas onboard the spacecraft to be used for other things. Refer to the article for more benefits of the carbon-nanotube cathodes.

Cheers,
Brittany

Reply

ms

190 Comments

  • 799 Days Ago
  • 12/08/2009

Re: garbled description?

I'm sorry, but this still doesn't make any sense to me. "Creating" electrons using xenon doesn't consume the xenon; the xenon still exists, just in ionized form. I don't see why it isn't still available for propulsion (which requires it to be ionized, anyway). What am I missing?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

1366 Technologies

Cotendo

iRobot

Crowdcast

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement