Chris Crisman

Q & A

David Blumenthal

Health IT's billion-dollar man.

  • November/December 2009
  • By David Talbot

By one estimate, only 17 percent of U.S. doctors use electronic records. But the federal government has ambitious plans to create a network in which patient information is shared electronically among medical institutions. As National Coördinator for Health Information Technology, David Blumenthal is writing the rules under which the federal government will spend more than $21 billion in stimulus funds to get the job done (see "Prescription: Networking"). Blumenthal, previously a practicing physician at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, spoke with David Talbot, Technology Review's chief correspondent.

TR: How long will it take to create a national health-information network?

David Blumenthal: The president has said that everyone will have an electronic health record by 2014. That is the goal we are working toward right now. We are trying to make the network available as fast as we can.

TR: Can health IT reduce the skyrocketing U.S. health-care costs?

Advertisement

DB: The Congressional Budget Office projected dollar savings from the [stimulus] legislation at about $12 billion over 10 years. I expect that the actual savings will far exceed that amount.

TR: How do we get around the potential problems with electronic systems--such as overwhelming physicians with data or actually causing medical errors?

DB: Electronic health records and other forms of health IT can certainly be improved, and there are examples of bad implementation and other problems. I still think that on the whole, across the country we'd be better off with universal availability of electronic health records. We'd have fewer errors, fewer missed diagnoses, less duplication of tests, and fewer adverse drug events.

TR: If health-IT systems reduce such errors and lead to fewer needless procedures, why haven't the insurance companies stampeded to get them installed?

DB: The insurance companies have been able to pass along the costs of waste in our health-care system to their clients.

TR: You are setting the definitions of "meaningful use"--the criteria hospitals and physicians must meet to collect their cash incentives for installing IT. What will be in these definitions?

DB: I can't speak to the specific criteria at this point. We are in the middle of writing the regulations, and the initial release is anticipated in December.

TR: You're giving out $564 million for states to form health-information exchanges among medical providers. Why don't even the most electronically progressive hospitals--including your own Mass General--already share their data?

DB: There has never been a business case for health-information exchange. As a matter of fact, there has been a negative case: if you give away your information, you may lose it. You may lose the patient.

Print

Related Articles

Connecting Electronic Medical Records

The power of search engines is applied to health-care data.

Prescription: Networking

A new urban network suggests how technology could remake health care.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

JEngdahlJ

8 Comments

  • 846 Days Ago
  • 10/20/2009

The Big Picture

Federal funding may be encouraging a move toward EHR, but there's more to it than just installing systems. How can healthcare data pooling lead to a better system? More at http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=1499

Reply

mscheuerman

1 Comment

  • 836 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2009

EHR is a step in the right direction

I'm glad to see that we have someone focused on trying to get the healthcare industry moving toward providing doctors and other healthcare providers with the information they need to do their job more effectively. The article last week in TR http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23545/?nlid=2443 points up the need to have the right information available at the point of service. It's not only a cost issue, but also a patient care issue.
There is also an article in Newsweek http://www.newsweek.com/id/218235 that illustrates the need for more publicly available outcomes research so that the patient can work with their physician to determine the best course of treatment for an ailment.

I wish Dr Blumenthal all the luck in the world - he will need it to cut the Gordian knot in healthcare information sharing.

Reply

z0rr0

99 Comments

  • 836 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2009

No Business Case?

Hmmm..
"there has never been a business case for information exchange"

But spending $21 billion of taxpayer dollars to save $12 billion over 10 years makes total business sense ???

Reply

adamc

1 Comment

  • 835 Days Ago
  • 10/31/2009

Factual Error

The interview states that the average 65 year old with 5 chronic conditions has 14 doctors and multiple prescriptions. I believe this statistic is reversed.

People 65-69 years old on average have five chronic conditions and take 14 medications. They might have multiple doctors, but probably not 14. See "Textbook of Therapeutics: Drug and Disease Management", pg. 1830

Reply

  • 833 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

Re: Factual Error

Thanks for the comment. My colleague Matt Mahoney, our research editor, reports that a passage in a NEJM paper very closely matches the facts as stated by David Blumenthal. We're checking further into this, but meantime here is the passage:

"Any policymaker who is considering the modernization of Medicare must recognize that the 23 percent of beneficiaries with five or more chronic conditions account for 68 percent of the program’s spending. In addition, the treatment of these beneficiaries is likely to remain a high-cost item until they die, since every year they see an average of 13 physicians and fill an average of 50 prescriptions."
Gerard Anderson, "Medicare and Chronic Conditions," NEJM July 21, 2005

Reply

jykong

1 Comment

  • 833 Days Ago
  • 11/02/2009

single medical id

The question about the need for a single medical id was a good one.  I've worked in the Health IT field far longer than that name has existed and specifically been involved in integrating EHRs and ancillary systems like Pharmacy and Lab for over fifteen years.  Nothing is more crucial than having a common ID and processes for merging data together for the right person.  As I look ahead to the challenges for a National Health IT I see the lack of a single medical ID as a very sizable achilles heel that will be faced by all architects and systems analysts that have to solve the same problem.  Without a single medical id you are left with patient demographic data (e.g. address and human mediation.)  That alone will create large numbers of errors and patient safety problems.  Unfortunately, there are not many vendors or health care providers who fully appreciate the size of this problem because they lack the longitudinal experience. 

Reply

policyminds20

1 Comment

  • 829 Days Ago
  • 11/06/2009

Re: single medical id

I agree completely the single medical ID is critical point.  Further however, is the question of the authentication to the network and individual records to ensure 1)the person accessing the information is authorized and 2)they pull-up the proper record.  The last thing anyone wants is to have someone else's information in our medical record. In other countries smart cards are issued to both patients and healthcare professionals to manage records.  It would be helpful if Blumenthal would look at theose systems.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Groupon

iRobot

Roche

American Superconductor

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement