The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
Most physicians have little time or inclination to comparison shop for EHR systems and are ill-equipped to deal with the technology problems likely to crop up when implementing them. "We can't assume every small practice will be able to [install EHRs] on their own," says Farzad Mostashari, an assistant commissioner in the New York City Department of Health who has helped oversee the city's EHR program. "The most effective implementations have been community wide," says Bates. "On their own, people pick too many different programs and make it difficult to exchange information."
In a letter sent to the White House and to Congress last week, a number of physicians and health-care administrators from across the country, including Halamka and Mostashari, urged the incorporation of community-level guidance into the bill. Legislators appeared to have listened, designating funding for regional health-care IT centers that will provide technical and other assistance to area providers. The bill includes funding--via competitive grants--for regional centers that would help relieve this burden by providing best-practice guidelines and technical assistance.
The letter cited two successful examples of community-based deployments: New York's primary-care information project and the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative. The New York project, launched in 2007, is an effort to bring EHRs to primary-care providers even in the poorest parts of the city. The program provides technical training and support, and will also assess both the economic and health benefits of going digital. "The experience in [Massachusetts and New York] has been nearly 100 percent successful adoption of EHR implementation in the practices that participated," says Harvard Medical School's Halamka.
Community-based efforts are also important to adequately address privacy issues, one of the biggest concerns that have cropped up in response to EHRs."Small practices have no experience with security features," says Mostashari. "We have a privacy lawyer who helps develop privacy practices so providers can take steps to reduce their risk."
He emphasizes that while electronic health records carry some risk--data on thousands of people could be inadvertently or purposely released--there are also benefits, such as being able to audit who accessed a particular chart.
Companies that sell EHRs are already gearing up for the expanding market. "We intend to aggressively ramp up our business," says Girish Kumar Navani, president and cofounder of eClinicalWorks, a Massachusetts-based technology firm that supplied software and support to both the Massachusetts and New York EHR projects. "We're planning to open an office in California and will hire a lot of people there as well."
You would think money designated for medical purposes would actually be used in a clinical sense, rather than a bureaucratic office records keeping scheme.
The ARRA specifically specifies that these funds be spent on bureaucratic record keeping, not care. In reality, the record keeping is built into the care that the government funds today (just like a gallon of gas includes the cost of gas company advertising and other overhead costs).
The plan is that the modernization of this record keeping will reduce the .5 trillion dollars the government spends on healthcare each year.
Being able to exchange data between information systems requires common metadata -- the descriptions of the meanings of the information that is passed. IT managers know this. Even MDs I have spoken with know this. With common metadata you don't need one giant information system, but independent, cooperating systems from multiple, competing vendors.
Developing common metadata is not that difficult nor expensive. It requires perhaps a year of workshops, meetings, analysis, drafts, and comments by participants from the medical profession, hospitals, insurance companies, the government health care programs, and information system suppliers. Once the metadata standards are established the systems will evolve naturally.
A minor correction to the article...the Office of the National Coordinator of Healthcare Information Technology is not created by this bill. It was established by President George W. Bush in 2003 when he announced his plans to implement interoperable Electronic Health Records in 10 years. A goal that lost its priority when the administration focused on the war and national security. The existing National Coordinator, Dr. Kolodner, was appointed by President Bush.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
millikenresearch
12 Comments
Records
Finally, the government is taking over all of healthcare. At last, I can relax.
Reply
colinnwn
88 Comments
Government and health care
I sense sarcasm in your comment. <sarcasm>You know private payer healthcare insurance, and tax incentives to provide it have done so well ensuring most people have access to affordable high quality health care too</sarcasm>
Reply
CandidCIO
3 Comments
Re: Records
Over half of healthcare is already government funded through Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, the Veteran's Administration and Indian Health Programs.
Reply