Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Big Stimulus Boost for Electronic Health Records

Wiring up physicians from small practices will be one of the biggest hurdles.

By Emily Singer

Friday, February 20, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Physicians and information specialists across the country are feverishly figuring out how to best prepare for the impending availability of $19 billion designated for health-care IT spending in the newly signed stimulus bill. Broadly deploying electronic health records (EHRs), they say, will require special support for small private practices across the country. These physicians provide up to 80 percent of the nation's health care, but fewer than 20 percent of them are currently using EHRs.

Credit: Technology Review

The bulk of the stimulus funds--$17 billion--will go toward incentives in the form of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements for physicians and hospitals that use electronic systems. Starting in 2011, physicians using health information technologies, such as EHRs and electronic prescribing systems, will be eligible for $40,000 to $65,000, and hospitals will be eligible for several million dollars. The incentives would be phased out over time, with penalties for those who fail to adopt electronic records within five years. "I think many people were disappointed that incentives won't kick in for a couple of years," says David Bates, chief of the Division of General Medicine at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston. "But those incentives are going to be substantial, and I think [practices] will start to adopt electronic health records now."

Only about 4 to 25 percent of providers in the United States use electronic record-keeping systems, depending on the size of the practice. The bill won't require that all doctors use EHRs, or directly pay for the software. But its incentive program will help overcome the major barrier in getting physicians to adopt these systems. While doctors must spend $40,000 to $50,000 to buy an EHR system and may lose significant productivity in the first few months of use, with the current system, it's insurers and payers rather than physicians who would reap the savings that EHRs would bring, says John Halamka, chief information officer and dean for technology at Harvard Medical School. The system is similar to that employed in Denmark, which has some of the highest EHR use in the world.

Story continues below


In addition, the bill creates an Office of the National Coordinator of Healthcare Information Technology, a body within the Department of Health and Human Services, to oversee adoption of EHRs and to set standards and best practices. That office will dole out funds, along with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and other federal agencies.

To get the incentives, physicians and hospitals must meet certain requirements, most notably using electronic systems that can share information between different providers and institutions. That is no small feat, and the remaining $2 billion in stimulus spending has been designated for the development of standards and best-practice guidelines over the next two years, as well as for training programs for the legion of health-care IT workers needed to implement these systems. "There is a huge gap between the number of people trained in this area and the number of people we need," says Bates. "Almost every practice of 10 to 15 physicians will need someone technical to help them out."

Comments

  • Records
    Finally, the government is taking over all of healthcare. At last, I can relax.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    millikenrese...
    02/20/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Government and health care
      I sense sarcasm in your comment. <sarcasm>You know private payer healthcare insurance, and tax incentives to provide it have done so well ensuring most people have access to affordable high quality health care too</sarcasm>
      Rate this comment: 12345

      colinnwn
      02/20/2009
      Posts:48
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Records
      Over half of healthcare is already government funded through Medicare, Medicaid, CHAMPUS, the Veteran's Administration and Indian Health Programs.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      CandidCIO
      03/01/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • [no subject]
    You would think money designated for medical purposes would actually be used in a clinical sense, rather than a bureaucratic office records keeping scheme.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lasertekk
    02/20/2009
    Posts:88
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re:
      The ARRA specifically specifies that these funds be spent on bureaucratic record keeping, not care.  In reality, the record keeping is built into the care that the government funds today (just like a gallon of gas includes the cost of gas company advertising and other overhead costs). 

      The plan is that the modernization of this record keeping will reduce the .5 trillion dollars the government spends on healthcare each year.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      CandidCIO
      03/01/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Metadata needs
    Being able to exchange data between information systems requires common metadata -- the descriptions of the meanings of the information that is passed. IT managers know this. Even MDs I have spoken with know this. With common metadata you don't need one giant information system, but independent, cooperating systems from multiple, competing vendors.

    Developing common metadata is not that difficult nor expensive. It requires perhaps a year of workshops, meetings, analysis, drafts, and comments by participants from the medical profession, hospitals, insurance companies, the government health care programs, and information system suppliers. Once the metadata standards are established the systems will evolve naturally.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    robert.hargr...
    02/23/2009
    Posts:28
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • ONCHIT
    A minor correction to the article...the Office of the National Coordinator of Healthcare Information Technology is not created by this bill.  It was established by President George W. Bush in 2003 when he announced his plans to implement interoperable Electronic Health Records in 10 years.  A goal that lost its priority when the administration focused on the war and national security.  The existing National Coordinator, Dr. Kolodner, was appointed by President Bush.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CandidCIO
    03/01/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.