The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
"Using these pattern-recognition-based techniques, the authors have been able to show that there is information stored there, even if on the surface it might not be obvious because the overall activity levels don't go up," says Haynes.
Previous studies using fMRI have shown that it's possible to determine which of a number of pictures a person is looking at. But the new study is unique in that it is not decoding sensory information in the brain, but memory.
The researchers also found that the brain-activity patterns linked to looking at a grating and remembering it bear a striking resemblance to each other. "During working memory for visual information, it almost seemed as though these early areas are holding an echo of the initial visual response," says Stephenie Harrison, a graduate student at Vanderbilt and the lead author on the Nature paper. "It suggests, in a way, that the memory trace itself is very similar to perception."
It still remains to be seen how the activity patterns detected by fMRI, which essentially measures blood flow in the brain, translate into actual neural signals, says Haynes. Because it measures information in chunks of three cubic millimeters, fMRI can't gather information about what individual neurons are doing. But "it gives us a better sense of what memory is," says Harrison. "It's hard to know because it's such a subjective personal experience, but this gives us a better sense of what someone might be doing: they might actually be visualizing the information."
No need to worry yet about Big Brother reading your mind. For now, real-world applications remain limited, says Frank Tong, an associate professor of psychology and senior author on the study. The ability to reconstruct from scratch a complex memory or imagined scenario is a long way off. "We're still just discriminating a simple binary state," Tong says. "If you increase the number of options, this would get progressively more difficult."
we have a ways to go until we get cyberbrains:
http://tinyurl.com/aqeawg
What they are and can use this for
I'd seen articles where they use this type of technology as lie detectors.
They don't need to be able to actually read the thoughts. Just tell the difference from between what someone looking at a photograph they recognize shows up on brain scans
-- vs --
the same person looking at a photograph they don't recognize.
They'd have to do some control runs to determine what brain patterns look like on photo's they know the person has or hasn't seen,
and they'd might have to ask only certain questions they could couch in a visual recognition manner, such as asking if they recognize a photo of the victim.
This of course brings up ethical issues about privacy of our thoughts, but since the technology is here and in development, it should be debated for proper use or banning.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
HarryWhitaker
3 Comments
it's not mind reading
Sorry, Jocelyn, this isn't mind reading, it is very clever brain locating, provided one knows in advance precisely what to look for and provided one has trained the subjects very carefully. Even at that, it's only 80 per cent accurate, not a lot better than the galvanic skin response, the pupillary response or that old 19th century stand-by, reaction time. The really interesting finding is that the fMRI "prediction" only works for the particular individual on whom the pattern classifier has been calibrated. Individual differences are the next frontier in cognitive neuroscience. Cheers, Whit
Reply