All in one: This system-on-chip die is an example of Intel’s future plans for consumer electronics and mobile Internet devices. This kind of chip can combine a microprocessor with advanced wireless radio, multimedia, and sensor functionality.
Intel

Multimedia

Computing

Intel's New Breed of Chips

The chip maker tries to diversify with system-on-chip designs.

  • Thursday, February 5, 2009
  • By Kate Greene

Intel has long dominated the market for personal-computer and server chips, but as sales of these components decline, the Santa Clara, CA, company is hoping to get a better toehold in new markets, particularly those for smart phones, netbooks, and other mobile Internet devices. To do this, Intel is exploring system-on-chip (SoC) designs--complex microchips that perform specialized tasks on top of general-purpose computations.

Future SoC hardware will be less power hungry and capable of doing graphics processing, complex wireless communication, and on-chip temperature sensing, as well as general number crunching and memory management.

Today, Intel gave a preview of several papers that its researchers will present at the International Solid State Circuits Conference in San Francisco next week, including some revealing new SoC designs. Among the SoC designs disclosed are ones featuring wireless radios capable of using several different communications standards and operating at high speeds, integrated graphics processors for mobile devices that are many times more efficient than those used in desktop machines, and built-in sensors that track critical conditions on a chip itself.

Over the past few decades, Intel has fulfilled the prediction of its founder, Gordon Moore: that the number of transistors on a chip will double roughly every two years. With these new designs, the chip maker is turning its attention to adding much complexity to its chips as well. Components on these next-generation chips will be as small as just 32 nanometers.

Advertisement

"This is a new era of scaling in an SoC world," says Mark Bohr, an Intel Senior Fellow. "As you reduce the size of transistors, the price per transistor goes down. It enables unprecedented complexity as we scale down to 32 nanometers."

Last July, Intel announced plans to build several types of SoC components based on an existing processor design, called Intel architecture. The company has more than 15 SoC projects planned, including a chip code-named Canmore that will integrate computing, graphics, and audio-video capabilities for portable devices and is scheduled to debut later this year.

At next week's conference, Intel researchers will also present work on chips that will most likely hit the market in three to five years, says Soumyanath Krishnamurthy, an Intel Fellow. One paper details an SoC featuring a new type of digital wireless radio that operates over a number of standards, including Wi-Fi, WiMax, and cellular-phone frequencies. One of the problems with this type of radio design, Krishnamurthy explains, is producing a clear signal. Without providing specific details, he says that Intel researchers have found a way to leverage the slight variations in silicon processing techniques to improve the radio signals.

Print

Related Articles

A Chinese Challenge to Intel

Researchers have revealed details of China's latest homegrown microprocessor.

Inside Intel's New Chip

With 45 million transistors and energy-saving features, the Atom processor could usher in a whole new era of mobile computing.

Intel's Breakthrough

Its silicon laser could mean a solution to one of the great challenges facing the semiconductor industry: how to move data fast enough to keep up with tomorrow's ultrafast computers.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Mapou

356 Comments

  • 1098 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2009

Intel's Coming Disappointment

Nice article. It seems that Intel really wants to introduce a line of GPGPU-type mobile processors. It is taking essentially the same approach to SOC processor design that everyone else (ARM, Nvidia, etc.) has taken or is thinking of taking. By this, I mean that Intel's engineers have convinced themselves that the future of mobile computing is tied to heterogeneous multicore processors. This is a grave mistake, in my opinion, because these hybrid monsters are a major pain in the arse to program.

Everyone can sense that the industry is ripe for a major paradigm shift. This means that the old players should tread carefully. Very big money is at stake. A single astute competitor that comes out with a low-power and easy-to-program homogeneous multicore processor is all it will take to blow everyone else out of the water, Intel included.

Any universal multicore processor, i.e., one that is based on a universal programming model and that can be programmed for different tasks (graphics, signal processing, general computing, etc.) without jumping through hoops, will transform the market overnight and force existing processor technology to go the way of the buggy whip and cloth diapers. When that happens, there shall be much weeping and gnashing of teeth among those who failed to heed the writing on the wall.

How to Solve the Parallel Programming Crisis

Reply

nishant kumar

12 Comments

  • 1098 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2009

RE: Mapou

I entirely agree with you on this one. Companies such as Intel are in an extremely volatile industry. Infact all companies in the technology industry are at the risk of losing money, if they don't keep up with new developments. The companies must also keep an eye on their sales price. Afterall, this is a competitive industry.

Reply

nostromo29

2 Comments

  • 1092 Days Ago
  • 02/11/2009

Another inappropriate article

There are too many articles in Technology Review which present large corporations like Intel as innovators. This is like giving millions of dollars of free advertising to Intel Corporation.

Other companies developed high-speed, low-power processors years ago; the ARM RISC processors, among others. Intel's processors dominate the market because of the Wintel monopoly, not because of any technical merit.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Taking a Measurement
Learn how to use your PC to take measurements

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

BUILD VERSUS BUY
Understanding the Total Cost of Embedded Design

National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

eSolar

Akamai

BIND Biosciences

iRobot

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement