Chip chilling: The thermoelectric cooler shown above (center gold square) is attached to a copper plate that is used to spread heat away from hot spots on chips.
Intel

Computing

Cooling Chips with Thermoelectrics

Researchers have made ultrathin refrigerators for microprocessors.

  • Monday, January 26, 2009
  • By Kate Greene

If you could remove the layers of circuitry in your computer and touch the main processor while it's running a video, you would feel its blistering heat, which can exceed 100 °C. Such heat, a natural by-product of shuttling electrons through transistors, can impede performance and even damage the processor in the long run. Traditionally, engineers have used simple copper plates to pull away the heat, and fans or liquid-based cooling systems. But these systems are bulky and can sap energy.

Now researchers at Intel, RTI International of North Carolina, and Arizona State University have shown that it's possible to build an efficient microrefrigerator that can target hot spots on chips, saving power and space, and more effectively cooling the entire system. Their work also demonstrates, for the first time, that it is possible to integrate thermoelectric material into chip packaging, making the technology more practical than ever before. A paper detailing the research was just published in Nature Nanotechnology.

The fundamental technology used to chill the chip, a thermoelectric cooler, isn't new, explains Rama Venkatasubramanian, senior research director at the Center for Solid State Energetics at RTI International. In a Nature paper from 2001, he and his team showed that a material called a nanostructured thin-film superlattice has superior thermal properties to other types of thin thermoelectric materials: the superlattice conducts electricity well but impedes the flow of heat. When an electric current zips through the material, its temperature can drop to about 55 °C.

"People have been talking about using high-efficiency thermoelectric materials for cooling hot spots on chips for years," says Intel manager Ravi Prasher. He says that part of the reason he and his colleagues were able to succeed is because they used a material that has shown exceptional thermal properties, and they relied on Intel's knowledge of chip packaging to build an integrated thermoelectric system that was engineered to fit within the confines of a chip's housing.

Advertisement

To put the microrefrigerator in the chip package, the engineers integrated the cooler onto a square of copper, just like the type that's already used in chip packaging to disperse heat. Usually this piece of copper is in close contact with the chip, but the researchers put the 0.4-millimeter-square cooler in between the chip and the copper. When the microrefrigerator was turned on, it cooled a localized region on the chip by about 15 °C. This is significant, says Venkatasubramanian, because generally speaking, for each five-degree increase in chip temperature, there is a marked decrease in reliability and performance of a chip. In the demonstration, the researchers only used one microrefrigerating unit but foresee using three or four per chip, to cover the hottest areas.

Print

Related Articles

Cell-Phone Chips to the Rescue

Data centers, under greater demand than ever, are looking to low-power chips as a way to save money—but switching won't be easy.

Heat-Harvesting Nanomaterials

A new design could help thermoelectric materials find broader use.

A Laptop Cooled with Ionic Wind

The thin and efficient technology could replace bulky cooling fans.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

stradric

33 Comments

  • 1107 Days Ago
  • 01/27/2009

Moore's Law in Effect

This was a great article.  I have long been wondering why such coolers haven't already been integrated into chips.  But the article definitely explains why it is such a challenge.

Anyway, this is great news for Moore's Law.

Reply

Elroch

56 Comments

  • 1102 Days Ago
  • 02/01/2009

Efficiency?

Last I heard, thermoelectric cooling was 10% efficient. That is, for every 100Wh you draw from the chip, you need 1kWh of electrical power. A conventional refrigeration device can achieve 400% efficiency (i.e. it can remove 400Wh of heat for each 100Wh of electricity used). How efficient is this new technology? I very much doubt that this 40X gap in efficiency will have changed by enough to make this device useful to anyone who has the slightest concern about electricity usage or environmental impact.

Reply

synapse709

3 Comments

  • 624 Days Ago
  • 05/25/2010

Peltier = excess heat?

I have played with multiple wattages of these peltier coolers and have found no use for them as an efficient cooler. The reason is that a peltier becomes very cold on one side while also becoming extremely hot on the other. If you don't cool the hot side, the cold side will not stay cold. How is this supposed to work for laptops when the user of course doesn't want their hands burned off?

A better, already on-the-market solution using this technology slightly more efficiently is the COOL-IT system. It basically combines a Thermoelectric unit with a radiator/pump water cooling system. But, it wouldn't work for a laptop because of the size requirements of the water cooling system.

http://www.coolitsystems.com/index.php/en/freezone-elite.html

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Taking a Measurement
Learn how to use your PC to take measurements

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

BUILD VERSUS BUY
Understanding the Total Cost of Embedded Design

National Instruments has gathered customer information and data regarding some of the cost differences between building a custom solution versus using NI off-the-shelf tools. Using this data, we built the Graphical System Design ‘Build vs. Buy’ Calculator. The calculator can help show the financial differences between building a custom solution versus buying an off-the-shelf system. This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of both a traditional custom design approach and off-the-shelf embedded tools.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

First Solar

Silver Spring Networks

ARM Holdings

Lattice Power

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement