Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Monday, December 22, 2008

Moore's Law

The computer chip has evolved from a simple integrated circuit to a microprocessor with millions of transistors.

By Kristina Grifantini

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In 1965, when Fairchild Semiconductor's Gordon Moore predicted that the number of transistors on a computer chip would double every year , the most advanced chips had around 60 components . In 1975, Moore--who cofounded Intel in 1968--reconsidered his prediction and revised the rate of doubling to roughly every two years. So far, history has proved him more or less right. But growth may soon slow as engineers find it harder to contend with the heat produced and power consumed by transistor-crammed chips (see "Parallel Universe").

Multimedia
  Moore's Law

Comments

  • The Cybernetic Revolution
    Although Gordon Moore is still getting full credit for making that bold and prophetic statement when he did, I believe that we are simply going through the final stages of what I call 'The Cybernetic Revolution.' I have come to the conclusion that if too much complexity gets factored into any particular system, regardless of its nature, that system eventually reaches a distinct point in its development where the Law of Diminishing Returns starts to become the primary focus, initiates a breakdown in the whole process, thereby producing a net negative effect on the desired outcome. A state of irreducible redundacy is eventually reached which is roughly equal to the same degree of complexity which was originally created in an attempt to solve a particular set of problems. While this may seem like a rather simple minded approach to addressing what is a rather complex situation, instead of going into too much boring and irrelevant detail, I have, as they are fond of saying in the academic world, done the math. I would just like to say in closing, however, that while some comments posted on this site appear to be coming from somehwere way out in left field, the vast majority of them are just as constructive, informative, and insightful, as was that quaint little observation which our friend Mr. Moore made so many years ago. Happy New Year, keep up the good work, and I will look forward to reading what most of you have to say in 2009.  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    12/31/2008
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: The Cybernetic Revolution
      Phoenix, that's a rather bold assertion to make without providing examples or "math."  I'm not an expert on complexity, but from what I do know, people are interested in pursuing ever more complex systems for increased adaptability and robustness.  The trick is figuring out how to design complex systems... 

      Nice photo essay!  EE programs should standardize this slideshow so that undergrads don't have to see it 25 times...
      Rate this comment: 12345

      steveDH
      01/01/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: The Cybernetic Revolution
        Although I am just a rather simple-minded Canadian philosopher, and not quite up to your high standards of excellence, steveo, I stand by my statement. But in spite of the fact that, 'The Law of Diminishing Returns,' is a fairly straight forward premise, if you really need some fairly complex variables in order to get your bearings, just go to my post at Technology Review's article, 'The Social Life of Routers,' and you will see what my term, 'an irreducible state of redundancy,' means. The math, which you so earnestly seem to require, will be of no consequence unless you have some experience in defining what are some of the more complicated parameters which resolving various states of complexity requires. In the meantime, however, if you come up with a new formula for reducing complex statical problems into subsets of simple and easy to understand quantifiable relations, please let the rest of us oxymorons know so that we can all breathe a whole lot easier. Your humble servant always, William Eady
        Rate this comment: 12345

        phoenix
        01/02/2009
        Posts:172
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • More cores, the better
    Nice to see Intel's i7 quad core in there, but the processor that really kick-started the whole multi-core phenomenon was the Sun UltraSPARC T1 with 8 cores (and 32 threads.)

    Nice die photo at http://jinsatoh.jp/ennui/ultrasparcT1_overlay_die.jpg
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dnwdfw
    02/11/2009
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Technology Review Magazine

Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
By David Talbot

FEATURES

Interpreting the Genome
New technologies will soon make it possible to sequence thousands of human genomes. Now comes the hard part: understanding all the data.
By Emily Singer
Parallel Universe
In its effort to move forward, Intel dusts off old supercomputing technology.
Robert X. Cringley

Read more articles from this Issue

NOTEBOOKS FORWARD ESSAY TO MARKET Q&A PHOTO ESSAY REVIEWS HACK DEMO
Archives MIT News Subscribe Contact

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.