Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Giant Camera Tracks Asteroids

Continued from page 1

By Robert Lemos

Monday, November 24, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Many eyes: Each component of the orthogonal transfer CCD array consists of a five-centimeter device made up of 64 CCD chips. The large eight-by-eight array only contains 60 devices because the corner elements would be too far from the center of the focal plane to collect useful data.
Credit: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii

Such a design will likely be the way of the future for very large focal-plane cameras, says Donald Figer, an astronomer and the director of the Rochester Imaging Detector Laboratory (RIDL), in New York.

Tiling the camera's focal plane into numerous CCDs and using the orthogonal transfer technology allows it to avoid a problem that often affects larger CCD chips, Figer says. This issue, called blooming, occurs because of contrasts in the intensities of light coming from a field of stars. A very bright star can create a large electrical charge in a particular row and column of a CCD chip, because its intensity overwhelms the part of the sky imaged on the chip. CCDs deliver their data along the rows and columns of the semiconductor circuits, so a strong light signal can overwhelm the other pixels in the same row and column. But by using many chips, the effect can be localized, and by moving the image using orthogonal transfer, the peak intensity can be corrected.

"The orthogonal transfer capability allows it to shuffle charge along the segments," Figer says. "It allows you to effectively get a clearer image. Other cameras do something like that, but they do it by deforming the mirror."

Pan-STARRS's approach is different from that used in large telescopes in other observatories, such as the Keck Observatory's two 10-meter telescopes on Mauna Kea, in Hawaii. Large telescopes typically use adaptive optics to correct for atmospheric turbulence by taking advantage of a bright object, known as a natural guide star, near the target. By adjusting the telescope's image to correct for aberrations detected in the guide-star image, a much clearer picture--corrected for atmospheric turbulence--results. However, in 99 percent of viewing cases, a natural guide star is not available, so Keck 1 and Keck 2 use a laser guide star, which is created by sending a sodium-wavelength laser beam into the upper atmosphere to excite a thin layer of sodium atoms there. This creates a reference point near the target of observation, similar to a natural guide star.

A ground-based telescope equipped with adaptive optics can produce images with a resolution comparable to that of the Hubble telescope. However, the approach is too expensive for smaller telescopes, such as the 1.8-meter Pan-STARRS scopes. At lower cost, however, the image correction performed by the OTCCDs results in a picture of similar, if not quite as good, quality.

Comments

  • Why not Spaced Based
    The only picture shown is the array of optic sensors. If this assembly is so small, why not load it into the next Shuttle Mission and setup a system in space that will never be blocked by clouds or need to be adjusted for distortion?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mkogrady
    11/25/2008
    Posts:206
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • A Few 1k Lbs Of Optics, CPUs
      The sensor array you're looking at is the smallest part of the puzzle. There are also a number of high speed processors to pull the images from the sensors. There's the mirror and glass optics to focus light onto the sensors. There's the metal to hold the whole thing together.

      Also, there's a huge array of cpus, mass storage, and network gear to process gigabytes of data before the next night of viewing. Currently, there is just no way to host all of that stuff in orbit, unless we want to retask the ISS.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cmholm
      11/25/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: A Few 1k Lbs Of Optics, CPUs
        Ideally you would limit processors in orbit to the bare minimum with data storage and transmit data to the larger processors at the ground station etc., but if ways can be developed to account for the atmosphere then it is far cheaper at present to keep everything ground based, I would suspect.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        shakesepare1...
        12/05/2008
        Posts:1
  • Dpendence on Reflectivity
    The surface reflectivity of asteroids is pretty low and still lower ( about 4%) for the Low occurrence High Consequence Comets. Detecting small or/and far off NEOs is going to take more than just a large telescopic camera..

    There should be efforts to operate at much wider spectrum of wavelengths.. Perhaps a powerful Space based Radar could be still more useful !!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sougatapahar...
    03/31/2009
    Posts:18
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

The Marcellus Shale Gas Rush
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.