Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Giant Camera Tracks Asteroids

The camera will offer sharper, broader views of the sky.

By Robert Lemos

Monday, November 24, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The first of four new asteroid-tracking telescopes will come online next month in Hawaii, promising to quickly scan large swaths of the sky--thanks to the world's largest digital camera.

Keeping watch: The prototype Pan-STARRS telescope, PS1, focused on Comet Holmes during trials in 2008. The detail is about one-half of what is expected when the telescope goes online in December.
Credit: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii

The project, known as the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS), aims to scan the entire sky visible from the summit of Mount Haleakala in Maui Island, Hawaii, three times a month, searching for asteroids and near-Earth objects (NEOs) as small as 300 meters in diameter. At the heart of each telescope is a 1.4-billion-pixel digital camera that can photograph broad swaths of the night sky in sharp detail.

The first prototype telescope using the camera will go online in December. This telescope will scan the night sky, searching for asteroids and comets that could pose a threat to Earth. Pan-STARRS is designed to have at least three times the collecting power of current NEO telescopes.

The Pan-STARRS's cameras, each consisting of a 40-centimeter-square array of charge-coupled devices (CCDs), bring new technology to the optics used in astronomy. Perhaps the most innovative aspect is the ability of each CCD cell to electronically shift an image to counteract atmospheric blur and deliver clearer astrophotography, says Barry Burke, a senior staff member at MIT's Lincoln Laboratory, which makes the cameras.

"The atmosphere is the limit to the quality of the image, but there is a special feature of these chips that allows them to remove some of the blur due to atmospheric effects," Burke says. "It allows the image to be shifted in any direction in the chip in a way that matches the motion of the stars and that takes out a significant part of the blur."

Known as orthogonal transfer CCD (OTCCD), the technology uses electronics to adjust the image rather than mechanically tilting a camera's lens or mirror, a more common technique used in consumer cameras that have optical image stabilization. Because the process is electronic, the technology can be distributed to each cell of the CCD array, allowing for much more granular adjustments to localized atmospheric turbulence. The result is an image that is sharper than what a ground-based observatory could produce.

Story continues below


The mosaic structure of the CCD camera also leads to a more reliable system and less expensive manufacturing costs, Burke says. "The chip could not possibly be made to that size, so we are forced to break the camera down into tiles," he says.

Each Pan-STARRS camera consists of an eight-by-eight array of devices, each containing an eight-by-eight array of CCD cells. The size of each cell--about six millimeters on a side--is determined by a sweet spot: if the chips where much larger, the number of defects on them--and thus the overall cost of making them--would be too great; if they were much smaller, it would become much more difficult to organize them into the camera's focal plane.

Comments

  • Why not Spaced Based
    The only picture shown is the array of optic sensors. If this assembly is so small, why not load it into the next Shuttle Mission and setup a system in space that will never be blocked by clouds or need to be adjusted for distortion?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mkogrady
    11/25/2008
    Posts:234
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • A Few 1k Lbs Of Optics, CPUs
      The sensor array you're looking at is the smallest part of the puzzle. There are also a number of high speed processors to pull the images from the sensors. There's the mirror and glass optics to focus light onto the sensors. There's the metal to hold the whole thing together.

      Also, there's a huge array of cpus, mass storage, and network gear to process gigabytes of data before the next night of viewing. Currently, there is just no way to host all of that stuff in orbit, unless we want to retask the ISS.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cmholm
      11/25/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: A Few 1k Lbs Of Optics, CPUs
        Ideally you would limit processors in orbit to the bare minimum with data storage and transmit data to the larger processors at the ground station etc., but if ways can be developed to account for the atmosphere then it is far cheaper at present to keep everything ground based, I would suspect.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        shakesepare1...
        12/05/2008
        Posts:1
  • Dpendence on Reflectivity
    The surface reflectivity of asteroids is pretty low and still lower ( about 4%) for the Low occurrence High Consequence Comets. Detecting small or/and far off NEOs is going to take more than just a large telescopic camera..

    There should be efforts to operate at much wider spectrum of wavelengths.. Perhaps a powerful Space based Radar could be still more useful !!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sougatapahar...
    03/31/2009
    Posts:18
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.