Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Bringing Invisibility Cloaks Closer

The fabrication of two new materials for manipulating light is a key step toward realizing cloaking.

By Katherine Bourzac

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Invisible net: A new material that can bend near-infrared light in a unique way has a fishnet structure. These images of a prism made from the material were taken with a scanning electron microscope. The holes in the net enable the material to interact with the magnetic component of the light, which enables the unusual bending and demonstrates its promise for use in future invisibility cloaks. In the inset, the layers of metal and insulating material that make up the metamaterial are visible.
Credit: Jason Valentine et al.

In an important step toward the development of practical invisibility cloaks, researchers have engineered two new materials that bend light in entirely new ways. These materials are the first that work in the optical band of the spectrum, which encompasses visible and infrared light; existing cloaking materials only work with microwaves. Such cloaks, long depicted in science fiction, would allow objects, from warplanes to people, to hide in plain sight.

Both materials, described separately in the journals Science and Nature this week, exhibit a property called negative refraction that no natural material possesses. As light passes through the materials, it bends backward. One material works with visible light; the other has been demonstrated with near-infrared light.

The materials, created in the lab of University of California, Berkeley, engineer Xiang Zhang, could show the way toward invisibility cloaks that shield objects from visible light. But Steven Cummer, a Duke University engineer involved in the development of the microwave cloak, cautions that there is a long way to go before the new materials can be used for cloaking. Cloaking materials must guide light in a very precisely controlled way so that it flows around an object, re-forming on the other side with no distortion. The Berkeley materials can bend light in the fundamental way necessary for cloaking, but they will require further engineering to manipulate light so that it is carefully directed.

One of the new Berkeley materials is made up of alternating layers of metal and an insulating material, both of which are punched with a grid of square holes. The total thickness of the device is about 800 nanometers; the holes are even smaller. "These stacked layers form electrical-current loops that respond to the magnetic field of light," enabling its unique bending properties, says Jason Valentine, a graduate student in Zhang's lab. Naturally occurring materials, by contrast, don't interact with the magnetic component of electromagnetic waves. By changing the size of the holes, the researchers can tune the material to different frequencies of light. So far, they've demonstrated negative refraction of near-infrared light using a prism made from the material.

Researchers have been trying to create such materials for nearly 10 years, ever since it occurred to them that negative refraction might actually be possible. Other researchers have only been able to make single layers that are too thin--and much too inefficient--for device applications. The Berkeley material is about 10 times thicker than previous designs, which helps increase how much light it transmits while also making it robust enough to be the basis for real devices. "This is getting close to actual nanoscale devices," Cummer says of the Berkeley prism.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Alternative Cloaking Technology
    Shawn22 on 08/12/2008 at 6:46 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    Rather than creating new materials to generate negative refraction of light and then having to employ all kinds of nanotechnology and lenses to manage the redirection, why not embed tiny cameras and miniature flexible digital screens (OLEDS perhaps?) into a material matrixed together and effectively reproducing on one side of the material what is seen on the other? 

    I would think the technology is already there or more likely to be there than the negative refraction method using relatively cheap and small cameras as demonstrated in the August 6 article "A Spherical Camera Sensor".
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Alternative Cloaking Technology
      dkohn on 08/12/2008 at 11:39 AM
      Posts:
      3
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      Great idea.  Ben Bova talks about that a great deal in a few of his books.  I'd love to have such a device.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Applications to Semiconductors
    carlii on 08/12/2008 at 9:11 AM
    Posts:
    25
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    What applications could this material serve for present day semiconductor applications, and the future interplay with optics / light-based computing?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Not a cloak!
    cjameshuff2 on 08/12/2008 at 9:34 AM
    Posts:
    14
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    This is not and will never be a "cloak" for vehicles or people. Such a thing would not only require production of very large objects constructed from metamaterials, the metamaterials would have to work from the infrared through UV spectra without major gaps and with near zero attenuation. These materials can only operate in very narrow bands of the spectrum. And then there's the issue of carrying around a spherical shell wherever you go...

    There is great potential for new types of optics, or for metamaterials that change properties depending on electrical field or on illumination from other sources, allowing more sophisticated processing to be done on optical signals. It has huge implications for everything from networking and optical computing to 3D displays and advanced imaging sensors. Seeing their full potential ignored while coverage focuses on such an inane and clearly impractical application is frustrating and extremely disappointing.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Not a cloak!
      Globe99 on 08/18/2008 at 2:17 PM
      Posts:
      15
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      Let me just echo what you said, that almost all these systems require exquisite nanofabrication techniques that aren't likely to coat your car anytime soon.

      However, let me just say that while the aforementioned points apply strongly to the Nature paper, it's slightly less so for the Science paper released last Friday. The two reasons are (a) the latter work shows negative refraction in the visible as opposed to near-IR and (b) the fabrication method is much more suited towards large-scale production.

      Specifically, material in the Science work was fabricated by template-assisted nanowire growth from an anodized aluminum oxide template. This is something you can do in a wetlab with simple chemicals, as oppposed to the Nature work that (I imagine) was weeks in the cleanroom with e-beam lithography and focused ion beam milling.

      Personally I think that self-assembly of chemically synthesized metal particles is the way to go for this field (but that's just my bias since I work with these types of particles). So it's nice to see things moving in that direction
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology