Mirror trick: A microscopic image shows a two-dimensional array of 100-micrometer-wide pixels. The new pixel design by Microsoft researchers uses two micromirrors, one with an aperture and the other placed directly in front of the aperture. In the “on” state, the first mirror bends, sending light bouncing off the second mirror and out the pixel.
Microsoft Research

Computing

A New Competitor to LCD

A novel pixel design promises to be faster and brighter.

  • Monday, July 21, 2008
  • By Prachi Patel

A pixel that uses a pair of mirrors to block or transmit light could lead to displays that are faster, brighter, and more power efficient than liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Researchers at Microsoft Research who published their novel pixel design in Nature Photonics say that their design is also simpler and easier to fabricate, which should make it cheaper.

LCDs corner half of the global TV market and are the most popular technology for cell phones and flat-panel computer monitors. But for three reasons, they do not boast the best image quality. First, the pixels do not turn completely off. Second, it takes 25 to 40 milliseconds on average for the pixels to switch between black and white, which is slow enough to blur fast-moving images. Third, LCDs are almost impossible to use in bright ambient light. "There is nothing in LCD technology that stands out," says Sriram Peruvemba, vice president of marketing at electronic-paper pioneer E Ink, based in Cambridge, MA. "The only reason it has done well is it's the lowest price [flat-panel] display today."

The new telescopic pixels switch completely off and on within 1.5 milliseconds. Michael Sinclair at Microsoft Research says that the ultrafast response time translates to simpler, low-cost color displays. In LCDs, a pixel is made of three subpixels--red, green, and blue--that are lit up simultaneously at different intensities to create, say, yellow. Each subpixel is controlled with a separate transistor circuit, which makes the circuits complex. Because the telescopic display switches so rapidly, you could put red, green, and blue light-emitting diodes behind each pixel, Sinclair says, and have them sequentially light up to create a color shade. "This would reduce the complexity and cost of today's LCD," he says.

The telescopic pixels are also significantly brighter. In an LCD, by the time light passes through the polarizing films, the liquid-crystal layer, and the color filters, only 5 to 10 percent of it comes out. The telescopic pixels, on the other hand, let about 36 percent of the light through. "I could get by with a less-powerful backlight, because the telescopic pixel is more efficient," Sinclair says. The greater brightness would also make the display more visible in bright sunlight.

Print

Related Articles

More Colorful Displays with Quantum Dots

Nanocrystals improve the efficiency and color range of LCDs.

Nanowires for Displays

Copper nanowires could be used in ultra-thin field-emission displays that are brighter and sharper than flat-panel displays.

E-Paper Comes Alive

E Ink is making color and video versions of its e-paper, but commercial products are a few years off.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

bkf11

10 Comments

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

RGB LEDs

Well if you have an array of RGB LEDS that you can switch on and off rapidly and individually then you don't NEED an LCD or any other kind of screen in front of it. The LEDs ARE the screen (eg an OLED screen) so I don't know how they can put this forward as an advantage of the new technology and it makes me skeptical when I read such claims.

EDIT:
Oh, I see now that the LEDs are probably a single light source backlighting the entire screen and the display itself modulates the individual pixels. OK, I spoke too soon!

Reply

emilius

6 Comments

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

Lifespan

Since there is to much mechanics involved lifespan would be considerably less than LCD.

Reply

bj

50 Comments

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

Re: Lifespan

This is probably a positive factor in rushing them to market. Anything to get us "consumers" to buy more crap, and to hell with the environment or anything else that stands in the way of Profit. It's called Planned and Perceived Obsolescence.

Reply

cjameshuff2

16 Comments

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

Re: Lifespan

Wear occurs differently at microscopic scales. Similar micromirrors are used in digital light projector systems, and don't wear out over time periods where it matters...the parts are small enough that they never deform beyond the point where they can return completely to their original state. The flexing parts can even be smaller than the grain structure of the metal they're made of, if they're even made of metal in the first place.

The main issue I see is fabrication. LCD manufacture boils down to depositing a few patterned films on a glass surface. Building microelectromechanical displays of any sort will require more complex etching processes and more trips between etching and deposition processes. More expensive chemicals consumed, more time spent on the machinery, more production losses due to slight misalignments or other errors during processing. The technology might be superior, but I don't see it replacing LCDs.

Reply

gupta

7 Comments

  • 1303 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

Re: Lifespan

I do not see this as competitive for small displays, OLED's are almost there, and for larger displays, I have a hard time believing that photolitographic micromachining of MEMS micromirrors to be "cost effective" compared to LCD and other emerging technologies.  Unless they've invented some roll-to-roll MEMS or some super cheap process that can hold the geometry tolerances and material properties with extreme repeatability I am not holding my breath.  This is Microsoft we are taking about after all.

Reply

GaryB

119 Comments

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

If it works, I'll buy

Hey, if they can make it as cheap or cheaper and brighter than LCD's, I'll buy it ... as long as it's not attached to a windoze machine that is.

Reply

AshleyCJohnson

1 Comment

  • 1304 Days Ago
  • 07/21/2008

Contacting Reporter

I have some additional questions regarding this article. Does anyone know how to email or get in touch with the reporter?

Reply

Advertisement

Brittany Sauser

46 Comments

  • 1294 Days Ago
  • 07/31/2008

Re: Contacting Reporter

Hi AshleyCJohnson,

I can get in touch with the reporter for you. Please send me an email with your questions and I will forward them to her as I cannot hand out her information. email: brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com

Thanks,
Brittany

Reply

echoelman

1 Comment

  • 1303 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

If it updates current LCD tech, fine...

...but my bets are still on OLED's. Perfect blacks, no backlight, no blur.

Reply

Manuvidya

19 Comments

  • 1293 Days Ago
  • 08/01/2008

Re: If it updates current LCD tech, fine...

.. and since it organic, pixel life will be shorter as well ;)
To be honest, I think I'd sooner 'protect' my money by buying the new competitor than by going for OLED (which I think will be great for keyboards etc, but not for anything over 15").

Time will tell, though I like the sound of having a 40+" display for the price of a current 17" LCD display :P

Reply

godricbj

4 Comments

  • 1303 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

better and already advanced

there is an outfit called "unipixel" that has a tie-up with Philips. Their system switches in 2 micro seconds... yes milionths of a sec.
it's much simpler, cheaper, well into prototype, lets 60% of the light through and uses standard LCD fabrication... check out the website... so who wants Microsoft?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Google

Silver Spring Networks

Nissan

Apple

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement