Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A New Competitor to LCD

A novel pixel design promises to be faster and brighter.

By Prachi Patel

Monday, July 21, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A pixel that uses a pair of mirrors to block or transmit light could lead to displays that are faster, brighter, and more power efficient than liquid crystal displays (LCDs). Researchers at Microsoft Research who published their novel pixel design in Nature Photonics say that their design is also simpler and easier to fabricate, which should make it cheaper.

Mirror trick: A microscopic image shows a two-dimensional array of 100-micrometer-wide pixels. The new pixel design by Microsoft researchers uses two micromirrors, one with an aperture and the other placed directly in front of the aperture. In the “on” state, the first mirror bends, sending light bouncing off the second mirror and out the pixel.
Credit: Microsoft Research

LCDs corner half of the global TV market and are the most popular technology for cell phones and flat-panel computer monitors. But for three reasons, they do not boast the best image quality. First, the pixels do not turn completely off. Second, it takes 25 to 40 milliseconds on average for the pixels to switch between black and white, which is slow enough to blur fast-moving images. Third, LCDs are almost impossible to use in bright ambient light. "There is nothing in LCD technology that stands out," says Sriram Peruvemba, vice president of marketing at electronic-paper pioneer E Ink, based in Cambridge, MA. "The only reason it has done well is it's the lowest price [flat-panel] display today."

Story continues below

The new telescopic pixels switch completely off and on within 1.5 milliseconds. Michael Sinclair at Microsoft Research says that the ultrafast response time translates to simpler, low-cost color displays. In LCDs, a pixel is made of three subpixels--red, green, and blue--that are lit up simultaneously at different intensities to create, say, yellow. Each subpixel is controlled with a separate transistor circuit, which makes the circuits complex. Because the telescopic display switches so rapidly, you could put red, green, and blue light-emitting diodes behind each pixel, Sinclair says, and have them sequentially light up to create a color shade. "This would reduce the complexity and cost of today's LCD," he says.

The telescopic pixels are also significantly brighter. In an LCD, by the time light passes through the polarizing films, the liquid-crystal layer, and the color filters, only 5 to 10 percent of it comes out. The telescopic pixels, on the other hand, let about 36 percent of the light through. "I could get by with a less-powerful backlight, because the telescopic pixel is more efficient," Sinclair says. The greater brightness would also make the display more visible in bright sunlight.

Comments

  • RGB LEDs
    Well if you have an array of RGB LEDS that you can switch on and off rapidly and individually then you don't NEED an LCD or any other kind of screen in front of it. The LEDs ARE the screen (eg an OLED screen) so I don't know how they can put this forward as an advantage of the new technology and it makes me skeptical when I read such claims.

    EDIT:
    Oh, I see now that the LEDs are probably a single light source backlighting the entire screen and the display itself modulates the individual pixels. OK, I spoke too soon!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bkf11
    07/21/2008
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Lifespan
    Since there is to much mechanics involved lifespan would be considerably less than LCD.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    emilius
    07/21/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Lifespan
      This is probably a positive factor in rushing them to market. Anything to get us "consumers" to buy more crap, and to hell with the environment or anything else that stands in the way of Profit. It's called Planned and Perceived Obsolescence.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bj
      07/21/2008
      Posts:38
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Lifespan
      Wear occurs differently at microscopic scales. Similar micromirrors are used in digital light projector systems, and don't wear out over time periods where it matters...the parts are small enough that they never deform beyond the point where they can return completely to their original state. The flexing parts can even be smaller than the grain structure of the metal they're made of, if they're even made of metal in the first place.

      The main issue I see is fabrication. LCD manufacture boils down to depositing a few patterned films on a glass surface. Building microelectromechanical displays of any sort will require more complex etching processes and more trips between etching and deposition processes. More expensive chemicals consumed, more time spent on the machinery, more production losses due to slight misalignments or other errors during processing. The technology might be superior, but I don't see it replacing LCDs.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cjameshuff2
      07/21/2008
      Posts:14
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Lifespan
        I do not see this as competitive for small displays, OLED's are almost there, and for larger displays, I have a hard time believing that photolitographic micromachining of MEMS micromirrors to be "cost effective" compared to LCD and other emerging technologies.  Unless they've invented some roll-to-roll MEMS or some super cheap process that can hold the geometry tolerances and material properties with extreme repeatability I am not holding my breath.  This is Microsoft we are taking about after all.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gupta
        07/22/2008
        Posts:6
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • If it works, I'll buy
    Hey, if they can make it as cheap or cheaper and brighter than LCD's, I'll buy it ... as long as it's not attached to a windoze machine that is.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    GaryB
    07/21/2008
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Contacting Reporter
    I have some additional questions regarding this article. Does anyone know how to email or get in touch with the reporter?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    AshleyCJohns...
    07/21/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: Contacting Reporter
      Hi AshleyCJohnson,

      I can get in touch with the reporter for you. Please send me an email with your questions and I will forward them to her as I cannot hand out her information. email: brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com

      Thanks,
      Brittany
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Brittany Sau...
      07/31/2008
      Posts:32
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • If it updates current LCD tech, fine...
    ...but my bets are still on OLED's. Perfect blacks, no backlight, no blur.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    echoelman
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: If it updates current LCD tech, fine...
      .. and since it organic, pixel life will be shorter as well ;)
      To be honest, I think I'd sooner 'protect' my money by buying the new competitor than by going for OLED (which I think will be great for keyboards etc, but not for anything over 15").

      Time will tell, though I like the sound of having a 40+" display for the price of a current 17" LCD display :P
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Manuvidya
      08/01/2008
      Posts:19
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • better and already advanced
    there is an outfit called "unipixel" that has a tie-up with Philips. Their system switches in 2 micro seconds... yes milionths of a sec.
    it's much simpler, cheaper, well into prototype, lets 60% of the light through and uses standard LCD fabrication... check out the website... so who wants Microsoft?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    godricbj
    07/22/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.