Computing

Pushing Pixels

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, July 16, 2008
  • By Duncan Graham-Rowe

Also, by increasing the number of pixels, it becomes more challenging to access the information once it has been detected. "Fifty million pixels is a lot of data," says DeLuca, and a photographer needs to be able to read it off the sensor in a reasonable amount of time.

Until now, Kodak has used a process that involved dumping the information from one row of pixels onto the next and shifting the information along the row, reading it off at the edge, one pixel at a time. This is a relatively slow process, normally carried out two rows at a time. So to cope with the additional amount of data, the new sensor comes with four output channels so that four times the amount of data can be read at once. This enables the sensor to increase the rate at which images can be captured from 0.9 to 1.0 frames a second, even though more information is being captured. And yet this also allows the clock cycle at which the data is read off to be reduced for each output, which further improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

Power savings are achieved by the way that the sensor is reset before each picture is taken. This is carried out just before a shot is taken to ensure that there is no residual charge or electrical noise in the pixels that could reduce the quality of the new image. In previous sensors, Kodak has simply read out each of the pixels row by row, as if collecting the data for a picture, but then it dumped the information instead of storing it. "What we've included now is a new structure in the pixel which allows all the pixels in the array to be cleared out in a single clock pulse," says DeLuca. So instead of having to flush the entire sensor row by row, you flush the entire array in one go, he says.

This dramatically improves the "click to capture" time--the delay between pressing the shutter down and the sensor capturing the image. "Instead of being milliseconds, it takes microseconds," says DeLuca. And in addition to saving time, it also reduces the power that is required to perform a reset.

This technology doesn't come cheap. The sensor alone will cost at least $3,500. But that doesn't appear to have put off one camera manufacturer. Hasselblad has announced plans to launch a new camera featuring the sensor in the coming months. Nor is 50 megapixels going to remain on the cutting edge for long. Just this week, a few days after Kodak's announcement, another digital-imaging firm, DALSA, based in Waterloo, Canada, announced that it has developed a 60-megapixel sensor.


Print

Related Articles

Crossover Camera

Will a new low-price, high-def video camera make traditional still cameras obsolete?

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

djs

25 Comments

  • 1309 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2008

still a long way to go

Pixels of 6x6 micrometer remain very much larger than the silver halide crystals in film. I also note that a high end SLR digital camera with an 18x24 mm sensor is about as big and weighs about the same as a 45x60 (in fact 42x56) mm SLR camera that uses film. As usual, ease of use (in this case ability to e-mail pictures very quickly after making the exposure) trumps quality for most consumers. Perhaps not so much for professionals.

Reply

microbill

2 Comments

  • 1309 Days Ago
  • 07/16/2008

Re: still a long way to go

The pixel size difference is true but film grain is binary so it requires lots of silver halide grains to produce gray shades. CCD pixels, even though larger (6um vs 2um), can each produce a gray level - so although the pixels are bigger than the film grain the resolution may, in reality, actually be higher for the CCD.

Reply

ecota

1 Comment

  • 1306 Days Ago
  • 07/19/2008

Re: still a long way to go

A naive question: has anybody measured at which point a digital detector has more resolution than photographic film?

Reply

MatthiasF

1 Comment

  • 1305 Days Ago
  • 07/20/2008

Re: still a long way to go

Complicated question, since it depends on the film size.

If you are comparing against the best 35mm film, digital cameras have already surpassed the quality of film cameras.

Here's a site with Roger Clark's testing results.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/film.vs.digital.1.html

The rest of his site is worth a browse.

Reply

tygrus

2 Comments

  • 1303 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

Re: still a long way to go

Another limiting factor is the limitations of the lens. There is currently no point doubling the resolution of DX based cameras and smaller.

Smaller pixels mean more noise and high noise reduces apparent resolution. Just because you can chop the picture up smaller doesn't mean it's better. Film nicely rolls-off the highlights but the darker regions losses detail because of film grain and noise. DSLR beat film around 400ISO and faster.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

BIND Biosciences

Calxeda

Life Technologies

iRobot

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement