Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Assembling Nanotubes

A one-step method sorts and aligns carbon nanotubes for use in electronics.

By Lauren Rugani

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Nanotube network: Atomic-force-microscopy images show semiconducting carbon nanotubes aligned on a spin-coated silicon wafer.
Credit: Melburne LeMieux / Stanford University

A new method for sorting single-walled carbon nanotubes by electronic type and arranging them over a large area could be useful for manufacturing high-performance displays and other electronic devices. Researcher from Stanford University and Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology describe the method in this week's issue of Science.

Carbon nanotubes have excellent electronic and mechanical properties that could enable smaller and faster transistors, which are essential elements in a range of electronic devices. Ultimately, researchers hope to make ultracompact computer chips in which transistors are made from single nanotubes. But thin films of carbon nanotubes, in which several nanotubes are used for each transistor, can also be useful. For example, carbon nanotubes transport electronic charges faster than the films of amorphous silicon used now in transistors that control pixels in displays. Carbon-nanotube-based displays, then, could be more responsive. They would also consume less power--an important consideration for portable electronics displays.

But carbon nanotubes have proved challenging to work with. Every batch of carbon nanotubes has both semiconducting and metallic varieties, but transistors need to switch on and off to control current flow, which only semiconducting nanotubes can do. As a result, techniques are needed to sort the different types of nanotubes. What's more, the nanotubes must be carefully aligned to make working transistors. While other researchers have developed ways to either sort or align carbon nanotubes, the new method combines these two steps, which could make it attractive for manufacturing electronics. "We believe our approach is very practical, since the separation and alignment take place right at the surface, in a one-step process," says Melburne LeMieux, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford and the first author of the study.

To make carbon-nanotube transistors, the group refined what is called a random nanotube network, which involves depositing a carbon-nanotube solution onto a silicon wafer and spinning it rapidly to form a thin film of nanotubes. By chemically modifying the silicon wafer with either amine or phenyl groups, the researchers ensured that only one type of nanotube--semiconducting or metallic, respectively--would be absorbed onto the surface. The researchers showed that the process results in a film of carbon nanotubes with 90 percent of one or the other electronic type. They then added electrodes to the wafer to form transistors.

"It is hard to find an easier or simpler process than a one-step spin coating of a silicon wafer," says Michael Strano, a chemical-engineering professor at MIT. "This is potentially a very low-cost method to creating thin-film transistors from single-walled nanotubes." Although the films are not purely one electronic type or the other (a semiconducting film still has 10 percent metallic nanotubes), the researchers showed that the binding was selective enough to produce devices with useful electronic properties, such as high ratios between on and off states and the ability to quickly transport charge. The semiconducting surfaces showed an average on-off ratio of 100,000 to one, which the researchers say is the highest ratio achieved for carbon-nanotube films to date. Although on-off ratios for amorphous silicon are much higher (more than a million to one), the ability of the nanotube network to carry charges much more quickly compensates for this, by allowing the devices to perform faster. Nanotube-based transistors also require less voltage than silicon to be turned on, which reduces power consumption.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Not a good example
    dtutelman on 07/10/2008 at 6:42 AM
    Posts:
    22
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Quote from the article:

    "For example, carbon nanotubes transport electronic charges faster than the films of amorphous silicon used now in transistors that control pixels in displays. Carbon-nanotube-based displays, then, could be more responsive."

    This was in proximity to a statement about nanotubes offering faster transistors than silicon.

    This is not a good example. Transistors, whether silicon or carbon, operate in the range of nanoseconds or less. Displays operate in the millisecond range. And they do not have to operate any faster, because human response times are typically not much faster than 100 milliseconds. So improving the speed of a multi-millisecond display by nanoseconds is not a useful exercise.

    There are plenty of transistor-array examples (e.g.- memory) where nanoseconds make a big difference, but display is not among them.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Not a good example
      ioannis on 07/10/2008 at 8:59 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      although your general statement is valid, modern LCD displays with 1ms G2G do not exhibit any noticeable ghosting effect, human response times are not in the range of 100ms=10Hz !
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Not a good example
        dtutelman on 07/11/2008 at 7:32 AM
        Posts:
        22
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        OK, let's say 1ms. That is still orders of magnitude larger than the nanosecond times that the new technology is affecting, so my point is still the same.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: Not a good example
          mightybob on 07/13/2008 at 2:16 PM
          Posts:
          9
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          you give the human body too much credit. the accepted  mean reaction time of an average collage age student is around 190ms, thats from light stimuli .


          from http://biae.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm#Mean%20Timeshttp://biae.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm#Mean%20Times
          Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology