Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

A Picowatt Processor

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Additionally, the researchers paid close attention to the energy loss that occurs while the chip is in sleep mode, or not collecting or processing data. Transistors in the newest computers are made using a 45-nanometer process in which features on a chip are 45 nanometers in size. While this allows for more transistors on a smaller chip, it also results in electrical leakage, due to the physics of the materials at this scale. Blaauw and his team opted for larger transistors made using a 180-nanometer process, from a previous generation of chips. These transistors are in a "sweet spot," says Blaauw. They are big enough to have minimal leakage and yet small enough for the researchers to fit a large number on a one-millimeter-square chip.

To further minimize leakage, the researchers added special transistors that completely shut off the power supply to the processing transistors when the chip is in standby mode. This is a common approach, says Blaauw, but his team took it to the extreme and dedicated much more of the chip than usual to these "power-gating" transistors. "If a normal [chip] designer would look at this, he'd say, 'You're out of your mind,'" Blaauw says. "But it gives us the power-savings trade-off we need." In sum, the researchers combined a number of already existing tricks and fine-tuned them to achieve the record-breaking low power consumption.

The Michigan team, which is also led by Dennis Sylvester, professor of electrical engineering and computer science, still must add a battery to the Phoenix, and it needs to develop a way for data to be offloaded from the chip for further analysis. Once this is done, the researchers can work on full integration within a biological system, which could take years.

Berkeley's Rabaey, who is writing a book on low-power processors, says that the work is significant. "What has impressed me is that they've driven this to quite extreme numbers," he says. "The energy consumption is extremely low. Nobody else has come even close to this." Rabaey notes that this processor is intended for specialty sensor applications and that it won't show up in a cell phone anytime soon. However, it's an important step toward building implantable medical sensors whose batteries can last for years.

The idea of this low voltage chip is not new, says Rabaey: it's been used successfully in the watch industry for decades. But within the past few years, academic and industry interest in such design has blossomed as engineers are exploring more varied and ubiquitous uses of sensors, devices that require energy-saving tricks in order to be practical.


« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • pico watt
    midas on 07/08/2008 at 1:26 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    one pico-watt isn't one-millionth of a watt, but it's one-millionth of one-millionth of a watt, be 10^-12 (10 power minus 12) be 12 zero after the coma.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: pico watt
      Kate Greene on 07/08/2008 at 10:03 AM
      Technology Review TR Staff
      Information Technology Editor
      Posts:
      9
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Thanks for the catch. It's been changed in the article.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • in-body energy
    carlii on 07/08/2008 at 6:01 AM
    Posts:
    25
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Besides adding a battery, is there any chance to extract energy from all the biological heat, processes, materials in the body too?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: in-body energy
      b4b2 on 07/08/2008 at 4:02 PM
      Posts:
      9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I've wondered the same thing before.

      Here is a website that addresses the potential of using the electrolytes in the bloodstream to generate energy.
      http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/nanorobot3.htm

      Ben
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: in-body energy
        carlii on 08/13/2008 at 3:47 AM
        Posts:
        25
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        Thanks for that last website URL.  Based upon the article, it seems this area has more room to be pursued.  Various immune cells in the body are able to follow targets rapidly, using different aspects of the biological process.  We also know the machinery to produce DNA, and clean up randomly binding amino acids, all require energy too.  While traditional battery approaches, and heat differentials may be inadequate, other techniques will likely general more energy.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • [no subject]
    GreenPlease on 07/08/2008 at 9:09 AM
    Posts:
    7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    In order to extract "ambient energy" or in this case heat from the human body, a temperature differential would be necessary which means that part of the implant would have to be at the surface of the skin.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: temperature differential
      robin26 on 07/22/2008 at 5:51 PM
      Posts:
      10
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I wonder whether a useful temperature differential may be obtainable within the body.

      Within the lung, for example, there is constant ventilation and evaporation, and therefore some cooling takes place.  A device embedded within the lung may be able to achieve enough temperature difference between the lung's surface tissue and some deeper tissue in order to generate some small but usable electrical power.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • better check the math...
    robin26 on 07/22/2008 at 5:28 PM
    Posts:
    10
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Math error in the article? The article claims:

    "The processer uses only about 30 picowatts";

    "the processor consumes only 2.8 picojoules of energy per computing cycle";

    "The chip's clock...has been reduced to...100 kilohertz".


    These three statements don't seem to fit together. If the processor consumes 30pW, and the clock frequency is 100kHz, then the energy consumed per clock cycle is 30pW / 100kHz = 300E-18 J, or 300 atto-Joules. If one "computing cycle" means one clock cycle, then one computing cycle consumes 300 aJ, not the 2.8 pJ cited by the article.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: better check the math...
      smhanson on 07/24/2008 at 8:13 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The processor draws 30pW in sleep mode (i.e., while the processor is idle) but consumes 2.8pJ per cycle in active mode (i.e., while the processor is actively computing).  Therefore the processor draws 2.8pJ x 100kHz = 280nW in active mode. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology