Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Picowatt Processor

A low-power chip could be used for implantable medical sensors.

By Kate Greene

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Before long, sensors may be implanted in our bodies to do things like measure blood-glucose levels in diabetics or retinal pressure in glaucoma patients. But to be practical, they'll have to both be very small--as tiny as a grain of sand--and use long-lasting batteries of similarly small size, a combination not commercially available today.

Pico power: This tiny processor, called the Phoenix, uses 90 percent less energy than the most efficient chip on the market today. It could enable implantable medical sensors powered by tiny batteries.
Credit: Mingoo Seok

Now researchers at the University of Michigan have made a processor that takes up just one millimeter square and whose power consumption is so low that emerging thin-film batteries of the same size could power it for 10 years or more, says David Blaauw, professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Michigan and one of the lead researchers on the project.

But when this processor, dubbed the Phoenix, is coupled with a battery, the whole package would only be a cubic millimeter in volume. At this scale, Blaauw says, it could be feasible to build the chip into a thick contact lens and use it to monitor pressure in the eye, which would be useful for glaucoma detection. It could also be implanted under the skin to sense glucose levels in subcutaneous fluid. More broadly, this low-power approach to processor design could be used in environmental sensors that monitor pollution, or structural health sensors, for instance.

The processer uses only about 30 picowatts (a picowatt is one-millionth of one-millionth of a watt) of power when idle. When active, the processor consumes only 2.8 picojoules of energy per computing cycle. That amount is about a tenth of the energy used by the most energy-efficient chips on the market, says Jan Rabaey, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the research.

Story continues below


The Michigan team's main idea was to design a chip that runs at an extremely low voltage. While microprocessors for personal computers may require two volts of electricity per operation, the Phoenix only needs 500 millivolts, or 75 percent less.

At this voltage, parts of the chip don't operate well, explains Blaauw, so his team redesigned the chip's memory, which is smaller than most processor memory, and its internal clock so that it could operate with minimal electrical input. The chip's clock--the timepiece that synchronizes number-crunching operations--has been reduced to an extremely slow rate of 100 kilohertz, as opposed to the gigahertz rates of personal computers. This approach makes sense for sensors, says Blaauw. "If we wanted to monitor pressure in the eye . . . we only need to take readings every few minutes," he says.

Comments

  • pico watt
    one pico-watt isn't one-millionth of a watt, but it's one-millionth of one-millionth of a watt, be 10^-12 (10 power minus 12) be 12 zero after the coma.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    midas
    07/08/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • in-body energy
    Besides adding a battery, is there any chance to extract energy from all the biological heat, processes, materials in the body too?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    carlii
    07/08/2008
    Posts:26
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: in-body energy
      I've wondered the same thing before.

      Here is a website that addresses the potential of using the electrolytes in the bloodstream to generate energy.
      http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/nanorobot3.htm

      Ben
      Rate this comment: 12345

      b4b2
      07/08/2008
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: in-body energy
        Thanks for that last website URL.  Based upon the article, it seems this area has more room to be pursued.  Various immune cells in the body are able to follow targets rapidly, using different aspects of the biological process.  We also know the machinery to produce DNA, and clean up randomly binding amino acids, all require energy too.  While traditional battery approaches, and heat differentials may be inadequate, other techniques will likely general more energy.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        carlii
        08/13/2008
        Posts:26
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • [no subject]
    In order to extract "ambient energy" or in this case heat from the human body, a temperature differential would be necessary which means that part of the implant would have to be at the surface of the skin.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    GreenPlease
    07/08/2008
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: temperature differential
      I wonder whether a useful temperature differential may be obtainable within the body.

      Within the lung, for example, there is constant ventilation and evaporation, and therefore some cooling takes place.  A device embedded within the lung may be able to achieve enough temperature difference between the lung's surface tissue and some deeper tissue in order to generate some small but usable electrical power.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      robin26
      07/22/2008
      Posts:10
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • better check the math...
    Math error in the article? The article claims:

    "The processer uses only about 30 picowatts";

    "the processor consumes only 2.8 picojoules of energy per computing cycle";

    "The chip's clock...has been reduced to...100 kilohertz".


    These three statements don't seem to fit together. If the processor consumes 30pW, and the clock frequency is 100kHz, then the energy consumed per clock cycle is 30pW / 100kHz = 300E-18 J, or 300 atto-Joules. If one "computing cycle" means one clock cycle, then one computing cycle consumes 300 aJ, not the 2.8 pJ cited by the article.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    robin26
    07/22/2008
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: better check the math...
      The processor draws 30pW in sleep mode (i.e., while the processor is idle) but consumes 2.8pJ per cycle in active mode (i.e., while the processor is actively computing).  Therefore the processor draws 2.8pJ x 100kHz = 280nW in active mode. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      smhanson
      07/24/2008
      Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.