The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Excitable circuit: A new chip designed by researchers in the University of California system converts optical signals into streams of virtual particles called excitons, which respond to electric fields but are easy to convert into photons. Here, three streams of excitons emanate from the center of the chip.
Butov Lab
Virtual particles called excitons could speed data through telecom networks.
Computers get faster and communication signals get faster, but the interface between them--where the electrons in the computer circuits are converted into photons for the fiber-optic cable--remains clunky and slow. New transistors that rely on virtual particles called excitons could change that. An exciton is a state of electrical excitement that can pass from one atom to another, much as an electric current does. When an exciton loses energy, it emits a photon, so excitons are good at translating between electrical and optical signals.
"The problem in existing systems is the barrier at the interconnect between the optical signal and the electrical signal," says Alex High, a graduate student at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), who conducted the research along with colleagues there and at the University of California, Santa Barbara. "This cuts out that extra step. Because excitons are carriers of light, you can manipulate them, do logic processes on the light in exciton form, and then release that light in another place."
The researchers have created tiny, supercooled integrated circuits made of gallium arsenide that can send exciton signals in different directions or merge two signals into one--jobs necessary to handle the rudiments of computer logic just as electronic circuits do. "The computation speed by itself may not be much faster" than a conventional chip's, says Leonid Butov, who led the research. "Where we can gain speed is in the transformation of the photons." Butov has so far demonstrated a switching speed of 200 picoseconds, which includes both computation time and the transformation of the photons into excitons. The speed of conventional conversion and switching varies with the material, but it's about an order of magnitude slower than Butov's switch. (Also on the market is an all-optical switch that doesn't have to convert optical signals into electrical ones. It has a switching speed of 50 picoseconds, but due to its large size, it can perform only rudimentary operations.) And 200 picoseconds is "not even the final answer yet," says Butov. "We may be able to make it considerably faster."
A smoother optical-electronic interface has wide implications. Fiber optics is the most efficient way to carry large amounts of data at the speed of light, and it's used in a myriad of applications, from telecommunications to temperature sensing to simply carting information from one computer chip to another. But at some point, optical signals almost always need to be converted into electrical signals--whether it's so your desktop PC can understand them or so they can be amplified during a long trip. Not only is that conversion slow, but the traditional converters are expensive, relatively large, and power hungry.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
johnalphonse
78 Comments
exciting
sounds like an exciting future scenario but we're still able present-day to have data move in excess of 100mbps to the desktop itself if it weren't for the imposed and perceived limitations created by economists and a government infrastructure that has its reasons apparently for not promoting the increased flow of information that would make movies-on-demand and other forms of media and file sharing an overnight success. i can only wonder, in whose best interests is this holding back of technology? and while other countries are already ahead of the US in these areas, and working every day at increasing its ubiquity, where are we headed as the rich get richer, the middle class gets squeezed tighter and the poor require more tax money for social assistance? but then who would the 10% rich exploit of it weren't for the other two majority classes? why is the simple math involved in economic slavery overlooked, in other words? the future is now, but who doesn't want us to have it?
Reply
tpcawle
2 Comments
Re: exciting
I have no clue what you are talking about. How can you turn a significant advancement in optical switching technology into political drivel? Fiber Optic backbone nodes are in dire need of faster switching methods. Network latency caused by the photon to electron transfer is significant. The number of node hops required to complete a host to host connection through the Internet (in many cases) can make VoIP, IPTV and other "real time" services unstable. As arcane as this topic may seem to many, it is a serious issue with us Internet Switching engineers. Terabit data rates that are possible in DWDM fiber networks mean nothing if we can't switch them. These guys deserve kudos for their efforts.
Reply