The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
Semiautomatic mouse pad: Forrest Liau, one of the glove’s engineers, is demonstrating how a soldier could use its controls while gripping a weapon.
Brittany Sauser
Three accelerometers are built into the back of the glove to sense the orientation and position of the hand, so that conventional hand-arm signals--long an important communication mechanism on the battlefield--can be used to send text commands to other soldiers' screens. A miniature computer built into the glove connects through a USB cord to the soldier's wearable computer system.
Thad Starner, an associate professor of computing at Georgia Tech and one of the pioneers of wearable computing systems (he has worn one daily since 1993), says that RallyPoint's real innovation is sensors that are light enough for soldiers' use and can be sewn into a glove.
The problem with most new soldier technologies is that people are trying to do too much, says Starner. Land Warrior, a wearable computer system built by the U.S. Army last year, was full of cords, batteries, and hardware that weighed almost 17 pounds. "It was an overkill of features, and the military stripped it down to its most essential parts," says Starner. "Soldiers are adapting the technology to their needs."
Starner says that by incorporating new types of sensors, like the track-pad-style mouse, into the glove, RallyPoint is creating something novel. The next step, he says, would be to make the glove wireless and to design it so that it doesn't impede soldiers' tactile sensations.
It's time that someone created something real and usable, and RallyPoint seems to have done just that, says Kortuem.
The battle field is going to be the quietest place in world ?
The voice recognition is spotty in quite office environment.
Other small thing is security, when you are talking to a computer you are going to tell the enemy to close there ears ? It will easily know where you go just by listening to you.
Prediction where you are going to strike even by 2-5 seconds will mean difference between life and death.
So dude !....
heh, i agree on that, maybe that subvocaliser tech that we all saw the video of a little while ago, but untill that stuff is at least as good as voice recognition it'll be difficult.
Something I'm concerned about with the glove is how durable it'll be. Will it be usable as an all purpose rugged glove, and continue to function as a control mechanism? or would it be put on and taken off as needed?
RallyPoint has partnered with the U.S. Army's glove manufacturer to ensure that the technology is implemented in gloves that are specifically designed for a soldier's needs.
still... a glove is a glove. do any of you ever use gloves? put on a pair for two hours and then tell me what a great idea it is! =;) and gloves in an environment with 110-degree-plus heat? was common sense consulted before this project embarked?
what this is moving toward is the sensors without the glove, wirelessly. they can be transparent, waterproof super-adhesive or somehow fingertip attachable, and thin enough to still pick your nose! we'll see this soon with video games © where you put the buttons on your fingers instead of your fingers on the buttons: ergonomic, customizable, and a heck of a savings on plastic.
I spent 11 years in the infantry, and we ALWAYS wear golves, regardless of the heat. You ever feel a weapon after it lays down 200 rounds in 3 minutes? Hotter than hell. Go look up 82nd + Iraq on goole images and see for yourself.
it goes without saying that voice would not be smart for tactical, close-quarters stealth operations. but at least 70% of combat is not stealth; soldiers routinely scream to and at each other. and you think Ahmad is going to translate on the spot? or as another example, nobody hears you whisper behind the scope of a sniper rifle a mile away...
Another benefit of not using voice commands is that you can scroll or zoom wile talking to other members of your squad. It is for the battlefield not an office; it will never have your undivided attention.
Hi,
Given that the video on the website for these guys was done in 2006 and the email address quoted on the website bounces I wonder how current and indeed active this technology is.
Does anyone have a clue as to how to get hold of these guys to talk to them concerning current status ?
Hi, I have contact information for the developers of the glove. If you send me an email, brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com, I can pass your email on to them. Thanks!
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
judbarovski
11 Comments
why smart glove, a voice onput is much better
why smart glove, a voice input is much better
Reply
johnalphonse
78 Comments
Re: why smart glove, a voice onput is much better
i agree. gloves are just the thing you want to wear when you seek increased dexterity and mobility, right? lol
Reply
Jorgecab
1 Comment
Re: why smart glove, a voice onput is much better
Voice could kill you. Battle field is very complicated, silence is better, a simpler move is better than noisy voice commands
Reply
Monsterboy
92 Comments
Re: why smart glove, a voice onput is much better
Well, since they're designing it specifically for use in combat, I'd imagine they're concerned about noise interference, like, from guns and explosives and such.
Reply