The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Big Leap: Stuart Parkin of IBM, pictured here, is well known for his advances in the magnetic read head technology that are used in hard disk drives. Now he’s developing a new type of magnetic memory, called racetrack memory, that could be faster, more compact, and more rugged than hard disks.
IBM
Researchers led by Stuart Parkin are developing a new type of memory chip that combines the benefits of magnetic hard drives and flash.
Researchers at IBM have demonstrated the feasibility of an entirely new class of data storage, called racetrack memory, which promises to combine the data storage of a magnetic hard disk with the ruggedness and speed of Flash memory, at relatively low cost. In addition, racetrack memory wouldn't degrade over time as Flash does. While still in the early days of research, these benefits could make racetrack memory an attractive replacement for both hard disks and Flash memory, leading to ever smaller computers and extremely inexpensive memory for iPods and other portable devices that now rely on Flash.
In this week's issue of Science, the team, led by Stuart Parkin, a physicist at IBM's Almaden Research Center in San Jose, CA, described a way to read and write multiple bits of data to magnetic nanowires, an important step toward making a prototype. Previous work by the group illustrated that the fundamental concept of racetrack memory was feasible, but the researchers hadn't yet demonstrated the manipulation of multiple bits. "It's a milestone in developing a prototype," says Parkin.
Racetrack memory consists of an array of billions of nanowires on silicon; each nanowire is able to hold hundreds of bits of data. Because the nanowires are so small, racetrack memory has the potential to be many times more dense than Flash. Unlike Flash memory, in which bits are stored as electrical charges in a transistor, racetrack memory stores data as a series of distinct magnetic fields along the wire. Flash memory degrades over time as charges leak and memory cells wear out, but racetrack memory, which uses magnetic fields, doesn't have this problem. And compared to the hard disks used in laptops and PCs, which store data on a bulky, spinning platter, racetrack memory has no moving parts and can be built in silicon, making it more robust.
Data is encoded onto racetrack memory by changing the magnetic properties along the wire, creating a series of magnetic barriers--called domain walls--and gaps between. Just as electrical charge represents a bit in a Flash memory cell, the gaps between two domain walls represent bits in racetrack memory. To read and write data from the nanowire, the domain walls move along the tracks, single file, past where stationary read and write heads are positioned.
That is, at least in theory, how it would work. But before the current research, no one had shown that multiple domain walls--essentially, data--could move along a nanowire without being destroyed. In order to move the domain wall down the nanowire, Parkin uses principles from spintronics, which takes advantage of the quantum mechanical property of electrons, called spin. He injects a small electrical current into the nanowire. As a result, the electrons in the current become "polarized," so that their spins are uniformly oriented, and when they contact a domain wall, they transfer the orientation of their spin to the atoms in the wall. This hand-off changes the magnetic moment of the atoms in the domain wall, shifting it forward on the racetrack, and likewise shifts all the domain walls on the racetrack forward, explains Parkin.
technology evolves buy depending on the past. previous technology combines and presents a new and better one... hope this combination of flash and normal one would produce a better .... more faster and efficient technology. thanks for the review.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
holoman
37 Comments
Back to an old idea
Mr. Pankin shows his age in the photo and his historical background.
IBM shows their greed and ignorance.
Great concept but old idea. Only need to be concerned with a single point failure, heat, stray
magnetics, materials quality, cost, yield and bandwidth to name a few.
Rockwell had a great concept called bubble memory in the 70's that was similar. Abandoned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubble_memory
Reply
Phineas
127 Comments
Re: Back to an old idea
Here's hoping Dr. Parkin is to MRAM what Dr. Nakamura was to LEDs. Nintey percent perspiration...
Reply
lambchuk
1 Comment
Re: Back to an old idea
It amazes me how some people feel the need to piss on the efforts of others to do difficult things. The tone of Holoman's comments go beyond pointing out the commercialization challenges that Parkins is no doubt keenly aware of and trying to address.
I'm grateful to those willing to buck the naysayers - otherwise we'd all still be living in caves pointing out the obvious stupidity of trying to carve a rock into a cylinder. Didn't Ogg already try that 50 moons ago?
Nice analogy to Nakamura's work, Phineas.
Reply
rocket7777
124 Comments
Re: Back to an old idea
Yeah, I was thinking of bubble memory when I read it too....
However, it is an improvement....
It is like LED borrowing from light bulb, ie both produce light from electricity.
Something even lamer did make many people rich... For example IBM hired few of hackers to steal CP/M since if IBM did it, it would have been sued(MS-DOS). Apple stole, xerox's GUI etc.(Lisa/Mac). And monetized intertrust's patents from help from
microsoft(iphone).
Also microsoft went to US government to sabotage tron's dominance to give it time to develope window95. Of course window nt was os/2 which was unix with gui.
Reply