Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Semantic Web Goes Mainstream

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Monday, October 29, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In addition to employing the Semantic Web standards, Twine is also using extremely advanced machine learning and natural-language processing algorithms that give it capabilities beyond anything that relies on manual tagging. The tool uses a combination of natural-language algorithms to automatically extract key concepts from collections of text, essentially automatically tagging them. According to Spivack, these algorithms adroitly handle ambiguous sets of words, determining, for example, whether J.P. Morgan is a person or a company, depending on the context. And Twine can find the subject of a text even if a keyword is never mentioned, he says, by using statistical machine learning to compare the text with data sources such as Wikipedia. "We can determine when a document is about a subject even if the subject isn't mentioned in the document," Spivack says. "So we can add new paths and new ways to get to the document" during a search.

Another technique that Twine uses is graph analysis. This idea, explains Spivack, is similar to the thinking behind the "social graph" that Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, extols: connections between people exist in the real world, and online social-networking tools simply collect those connections and make them visible. In the same way, Spivack says, Twine helps make the connections between people and their information more accessible. When data is tagged, it essentially becomes a node in a network. The connections that each node has to other nodes (which could be other data, people, places, organizations, projects, events, et cetera) depend on their tags and the statistical relevance they have to the tags of other nodes. This is how Twine determines relevance when a person searches through his or her information. The farther away a node is, the less relevant it is to a user's search.

It's still too early to know if Twine will be successful with consumers, says Tony Shaw, president of Semantic Universe, an organization committed to raising awareness of semantic technologies in business and consumer settings. Success will not simply depend on making the technology work, but also on managing people's expectations of the technology, he says. "It's about fighting the hype problem."

Twine will open up to invited users starting today. In the next couple of months, says Spivack, the tool will accept more users, and by the summer of 2008, it should be completely open. In addition, Twine will have an open platform that allows software developers to build tools on top of it, such as visualization software so that users can see their information in different ways. "But first, we're starting with the basics," Spivack says.

Comments

  • Useability
    These tools and technologies are fundamentally intriguing however, I suspect their ultimate utility will be throttled by privacy concerns. What's needed to compliment these efforts is a broad new paradigm that provides a construct for information and it's traffic; modulation by inanimate methods and finally, has a place within this construct for people (and their interests)- as individuals and in aggregates.
    These are my initial thoughts as a new reader and participant in this venue.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ddruck
    10/30/2007
    Posts:2
    • Re: Useability
      I agree boundaries and limit setting will be key.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      clarkand
      10/30/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: Boundaries and Limit Setting
        I agree, but consider as key as these are, once there are technologies that create value (or realize the value intrinsic within the metadata created) boundaries and limits are transgressed.  Difficulties with spam grossly illustrates what happens when technologies create value. 

        Here, value is created from pursuits that are intimately personal.  At first this value is provided for the source(s) of the meta data, and who else?  Maintaining traditional notions of privacy becomes increasingly difficult and needs more thought as these tools will likely illustrate.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        ddruck
        11/01/2007
        Posts:2
        • Re: Boundaries and Limit Setting
          So I am a psychiatrist looking to enter this field and provide consultative support to enhance social networking responsibility and address these concerns in development teams. Any advice on how to proceed? Guess I get my ideas clearly articulated and then get the resume going? This discussion is helpful.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          clarkand
          11/03/2007
          Posts:2
  • Twine: Better than Facebook or LinkedIn?
    I covered this in a network blogger post over at the AlwaysOn Network. See http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/20803 .

    A key challenge facing Twine is managing expectations. Will it be as good as Amazon's recommendation engine or Supply Chain Daily? How adaptive is it, really? And how finely tuned can it be made? Also, as with a trust issue, how are people rated? Can it be set with a minimum threshold? And how can someone's qualifications add to their "rating" (so to speak), even if they haven't uploaded, stored or linked to very much?

    Tough challenges for Twine, but I'm looking forward to using it. What I do not want, however, are people who are really no match for me. For example, I'll soon be entering my fifth year living in China. I'm affiliated with Tsinghua (China's MIT), have a pretty good Rolodex within the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), and the IT outsourcing and green tech sectors in China. Problem: I get a lot of people contacting me due to my writings for the AlwaysOn Network and Sand Hill Group; I write their "Letter from China" column. So I tend to get a lot of "Wow, China! How can I make millions there?" kind of messages. Twine might incorrectly link me with these people since we might be reading some of the same things. Alas, I'm looking for peers, not to provide free tutorials on how to do business in China. So this will one of Twine's major challenges, i.e., to provide highly relevant matches.

    Anyway, the AO link says a lot more about this, noting the positioning of Facebook, Furl, Foxmarks, LinkedIn, several others.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DavidScottLe...
    10/31/2007
    Posts:3
  • I see it as a partner
    to collaboration web based applications such as Basecamp rather than a LinkedIn alternative.
    The concept that people can add content to a shared area in a less structured way may be helpful, especially on the creative side.
    The idea of adding to a resource without necessarily explaining why you've added it - which separates it from email - might become very popular.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    weee
    10/31/2007
    Posts:34
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: I see it as a partner
      @weee, I would agree that Twine isn't necessarily a replacement for LinkedIn or Facebook. They serve different purposes. One allows automatic discovery using semantic processing (Twine), whereas the others require proactive discovery. Different functionalities. Matter of fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see Twine-originated relationships eventually "elevated" to LinkedIn relationships. (Note: I'm a relatively early LinkedIn user, although I'm refusing to use Facebook. Living in China, I get way too many junk contacts -- the equivalent of human spam -- as it is. A lot of "China 101" or "How to Do Business in China 101" questions.)

      Regarding Basecamp, I see Twine having no more relationship to Basecamp than e-mail does to a word processing package. They're both useful, provide very, very different uses. In a very large corporation, I could see where Twine might be useful in connecting people within the company. But I had the business development team use Twine at a 2,000 person company and we wouldn't have auto-discovered anyone else in the company that we should have known about. Also, and let's be honest, Basecamp still needs a lot of work. The UX (user experience) is adequate, not great. At the 2,000 person company, we had Basecamp as an active tab at any given moment, but as soon as I left, they dumped Basecamp. We also tried it at Startech Global and eventually dumped it. So I have mixed feelings about Basecamp's utility. A great idea, but still NTY -- Not There Yet.

      Because of the core tech underlying Twine, Twine has a lot more potential for those of us who are information junkies. For others, perhaps less so. Time will tell. That's why I emphasized in my AlwaysOn post the need for a lot of UX testing. Regarding how good the core tech, if the UX sucks, Twine will die. If the UX is great, but the core tech sucks, it will be a novelty. However, they might get lucky like StumbleUpon (IMHO, StumbleUpon was lucky) and get bought for an outrageous amount of money. (BTW, I like StumbleUpon. It's just that I like Furl a helluva lot better due to one key feature: The ability to create a personal digital library, something StumbleUpon and del.icio.us don't offer.)

      Twine + Furl + Foxmarks: The ultimate killer app for me. But compare the three: Twine has the most advanced core technology among them. And, quite frankly, I've got to believe that Radar Networks could easily add Furl- and Foxmarks-like capabilities to Twine.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      DavidScottLe...
      10/31/2007
      Posts:3
  • plagarism
    http://czeller.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/the-semantic-web-goes-mainstream/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jasonjason
    01/28/2008
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

White Matter
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.