Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Invisibility Made Easier

A new method for creating metamaterials that bend light in unusual ways may bring practical applications closer.

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, October 15, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In the past year, the media have been abuzz with talk of an exotic class of materials, called metamaterials, that could be used to make flat and distortion-free lenses, powerful microscopes, and even cloaking devices that make objects invisible. But versions of the materials suitable for practical applications have been difficult to make. Now researchers at Princeton University have demonstrated metamaterials that are both higher performing and much easier to manufacture, perhaps bringing these applications closer to reality.

Bending light: A new type of material causes light waves (represented by ovals) to move in a way that’s completely different from the way they move in ordinary materials.
Credit: Anthony Hoffman, Princeton University

"It's quite an important step," says Igor Smolyaninov, a research scientist at the University of Maryland who works with metamaterials. "It's much less expensive than anything else that people are doing."

Light passing from one ordinary material into another bends slightly--think of how a straight stick in water looks bent--but light passing into a metamaterial bends in the opposite direction. Metamaterials thus have what's called a negative index of refraction. A lens made from such a material wouldn't have to be curved. (It's the curvature of an ordinary lens that enables it to focus incoming light.) Metamaterials could also be used to route electromagnetic waves around an object, rendering it invisible. Already, researchers have demonstrated a cloaking device that makes objects invisible to microwaves, and others have created materials that negatively refract electromagnetic waves in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum. But until now, metamaterials have had to be patterned with intricate shapes smaller than the wavelength of light they're meant to manipulate. Consequently, materials that work with light of microscopic wavelengths, such as infrared and visible light, have been difficult to make. Because of the way they produce negative refraction, existing metamaterials have also had a strong tendency to absorb light, making them impractical for use in optics.

Story continues below

The materials developed at Princeton retain the property of negative refraction, yet they're much easier to make. Rather than requiring intricate structures, such as the split rings used in the microwave cloaking device, the materials can be made simply by stacking up extremely thin layers of semiconductor material. What's more, that stacking can be done by the same tools now used to make semiconductor materials for lasers used in telecommunications, says Claire Gmachl, the Princeton researcher who led the work. The new materials consist of alternating layers of indium gallium arsenide and aluminum indium arsenide, and they're tuned to work in the infrared region of the spectrum.

Like other metamaterials, the new materials affect light differently than ordinary materials do because they are made of structures significantly smaller than the wavelength of the light passing through them. In this case, however, it is the layers of semiconductors themselves that are thinner than the wavelength of light. Consequently, a wave passing through the material encounters multiple layers at once, responding to them as if they were a single material with properties quite unlike those of either semiconductor in isolation.

Comments

  • cool beans
    This is cool. I don't know how usefull it will really be, but like cloning dinosaurs, it's just cool!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kitk
    10/15/2007
    Posts:65
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: cool beans
      Well, there are lot of uses, most of which (like any new tech) are to be discovered yet.
      But just think about the flat lenses... With metamaterials you can achieve a greater concentration of light than with conventional lenses, thus improving laser technology, astronomic telescopes and any application that needs focused EM waves (maybe even very focused long range radio communications? Or even long distance transfer of power through EM waves? Ok maybe this is a bit to far :P).
      You could improve conventional microscopes (if they manage to make metamaterials able to concentrate a large range of very short wavelenght radiations), which would probably remain cheaper than electronic microscopes and more used all around.

      About "cloaking" technology, I find a hard time trying to think of something that isn't strictly militarily related, but I guess it could have its uses too.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      GeckoOBac
      10/15/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: cool beans
        I was thinking about non-miltary uses, if you could make a large square of something invisible say bricks for example you could have a house without any windows but still see out of it, which would be great for energy saving and security but maybe not so good for fire safety...
        Rate this comment: 12345

        cjwoodcock
        10/15/2007
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Non-military uses for cloaking
    1. Allow speeders to avoid police radar.
    2. Allow police to hide at the side of the road.
    3. Fashion.  For example, dresses that make fat women look skinny.
    4. High-rises in residential areas wouldn't have to be eye-sores. 
    5. Cloaking clothes for hunters and wildlife photographers (but unfortunately also for criminals and paparrazzi).
    6. Cloaked utility poles, cell phone towers, windmills, etc. (only visible up close) would reduce "sight pollution."
    7. One word: Toys.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    10/15/2007
    Posts:191
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Keep in mind
    1. Still very expensive.
    2. Wavelength-specific, not broadband.
    3. Still rather absorptive.
    Nevertheless, cool.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    10/15/2007
    Posts:191
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Keep in mind
      Cloaking?? Why don't we think of uses that are socially innovative, helps millions in their reasonable day-to-day life, and provide fundamental improvements in the quality of life while affecting the natural resources minimally? Fundamental research should be space-tec to the extent where it is capable of bringing cost of commercialization drastically down and consumption of energy astoundingly low. About coolness? Too cool technologies 90% of the time never see the daylight outside a research lab.. http://innovech.wordpress.com
      Rate this comment: 12345

      evolvingwhee...
      10/16/2007
      Posts:5
      • Re: Keep in mind
        thats wat i dont like about this site, you hear about stuf an u think its coming out soon and it nevr hapens...
        Rate this comment: 12345

        cretin001
        10/18/2007
        Posts:35
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
      • The problem...
        is trying to guess ahead of time which lines of research will eventually dead-end and which will eventually lead to socially significant ends.

        Lots of science has a long lead time before it sees practical applications.  For example, Fleming first observed the antibacterial action of Penicillium mold in 1928, but penicillin was not ready for use until 1945.  That's a 17-year delay, for something that in retrospect should have been a no-brainer for fast-track development.

        Another example is electricity.  Faraday demonstrated electromagnetic induction in 1831, but electricity was not put to "practical" use in society until Edison invented the lightbulb and started his electric company.  That wasn't until the end of 1880 -- 50 years later.  And of course, Faraday's discoveries didn't come out of nowhere.  He was building on research into electricity and magnetism that went back at least to Franklin a century before him.  So you could make the case that electricity had a 150-year development time, from initial scientific research to first practical application.

        A more modern example: general relativity was proposed by Einstein in 1915.  It did not see practical use until the GPS system was completed, in 1995.  That's an 80-year gap.  Another modern example: the structure of DNA was figured out in 1953.  The first practical use, DNA testing for genetic defects (or forensics), was not available to the public until about 1983, 30 years later.

        In summary, it is unrealistic to expect exciting discoveries to result immediately in consumer applications.  There is generally a delay of anywhere from 20 to 100 years.  Scientists work for our grandchildren.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        dmm
        10/22/2007
        Posts:191
        Avg Rating:
        3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.