The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
He cautions that these numbers are theoretical at this point. Whether or not the design will actually work depends on the materials used in the sensor stack. The materials that have the right magnetic and electric properties are complex alloys, such as lead zirconium titanate, cobalt iron vanadium, and platinum manganese. So far, only micrometers-thick layers of these materials have been shown to have the necessary magnetic and electric properties.
To make a practical read head, the layers in the sensor stack will have to be two to three nanometers thick. It's not clear if the materials will retain their properties at those dimensions. "When you go to such small thicknesses ... the behavior can change tremendously," says MIT physicist Jagadeesh Moodera, one of the discoverers of the tunnel magneto-resistance effect used in current read heads.
Moreover, putting together the complex alloys in a few-nanometers-thick sensor could be a challenge. The materials all have different properties, and they don't necessarily agree with each other, Moodera says. For example, one material might be sensitive to oxygen, while another requires oxygen. Nevertheless, the idea is sound, he says, and "it makes sense to pursue it [experimentally]."
Vopsaroiu agrees that his design will have to meet many challenges. But the read-head sensors used today are just as complicated, and manufacturers have developed ways to produce them easily. Besides, he says, to reach the milestone of one-terabit-per-square-inch disk density, the industry will have to experiment with newer reading technologies.
this technology is a great advanced. I saw that the people of the world are using more the computers that their pencil and paper.Thats why I think that it could help us a lot in our discovering of our capacities and evolution. Maybe some day we can have that big memory in our USB.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
jfreidin
5 Comments
What about writing?
Thanks for the very interesting article. Just wondering how that 1 Tb/in^2 gets written. Will it use same process in reverse, by applying voltage (current?) to the head, inducing a field over the target area?
Reply
briang1621
173 Comments
Re: What about writing?
That is a good point jfreidin. Hard drives read and write, I seem to remember Technology Review talking about this technology's discovery before. But I do not remember whether it could also be used to write bits on the disk head. In which case there could be a large disparity in read write rates. As long as something improves I am happy.
Brian Glassman
Commercialization
Innovation Management
Reply
Wouter
1 Comment
Re: What about writing?
Indeed it seems that the importance of writing-density has not been mentioned. The current technology in HDD's is pushing the "Areal Density" (Gb/in^2) forward by increasing the writing-density. The bottlenecks at this moment are the "writing heads" and the "magnetic media". Sofar, with "Perpendicular Recording" HDD-manufacturers are modestly confident that they can support up-to 1Tb/in^2 writing in near future and that the current reading sensors are not the limiting factor. However, the question is correct to ask whether with new writing technologies, the reading sensors will come under scrutiny again. We've seen the move from AMR (anisotropic magnetoresistance) to GMR (giant magnetoresistance), and could expect TMR (tunneling magnetoresistance) in the next few years. Who will say this smaller and faster technique, is not the next technology in line? But as mentioned in the initial article, getting it to work at the (technical & economical) scale necessary to be of advantage, a lot of work is needed!
Reply