Computing

Digging Deep on Mars

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Thursday, August 2, 2007
  • By David Chandler

While TEGA can't tell the difference between organics resulting from chemical processes and those made by living organisms, it could at least provide enough information to allow researchers to decide whether its landing area is worthy of later exploration by landers equipped to search directly for traces of life. "If this is a region where organics can survive, it might be a region one could go back to with a roving mission to see if there are indications of life or not," Boynton says.

Although it's a long shot, TEGA might also be able to find more direct traces of life. Three different groups have reported the detection of methane gas in the Martian air, although the amounts are low and the evidence remains controversial. With luck, the Phoenix device might pick up those traces, especially if, as some researchers suggest, they may sometimes reach higher concentrations in some places. Methane in the air, since it breaks down quickly, would be a clear sign of a very active process--either current volcanism, which has not been detected there, or the metabolism of living organisms.

Phoenix, a project led by University of Arizona planetary scientist Peter Smith, will be the first planetary probe whose operations will be run from a university-based control room rather than a space-agency center. This is a step toward making planetary exploration a normal, operational process and taking it beyond the experimental development phase. A similar setup has worked well for the Chandra X-ray Observatory, which is run from a control center in Cambridge, MA, and operated by MIT.

Phoenix also represents an unusually inexpensive approach to such a complex mission, partly because it was able to make use of spacecraft and instruments developed for the Mars Polar Lander, which crash-landed in 2002, and from the Mars Surveyor Lander, a project that was canceled by NASA in 2001. This rebirth with parts from lost missions gave the new mission its name.

Scientists have been puzzled by Mars's ruddy soil ever since the Viking mission in 1976 investigated the planet from ground level for the first time. The results from the twin Viking landers, which have been heatedly debated ever since, suggested the presence of some powerful oxidizing agent on the soil surface that very quickly decomposes any organic compounds there--an environment highly toxic for life.

But many scientists suspect that just a few inches below the surface, things may be very different. Radar and gamma-ray inspections from orbiting spacecraft have revealed a layer of subsurface ice on much of the planet, in some places just a few inches deep. In the near-polar region where Phoenix will land, ice may extend more than a half-mile down, and parts of it may occasionally melt in certain seasons. It's a place where, if life ever gained a toehold on Mars, its last straggling microbes may have survived for eons, and where some might even persist today.

Print

Related Articles

Imaging the Surface of Mars

A new spectrometer lets scientists learn more about the planet's chemistry.

Mission to Mars: A True Story

A graphic story chronicling NASA's various attempts to explore the red planet.

To Mars and Beyond

Rocket scientist Franklin Chang Diaz talks about finding the power and propulsion required to colonize space.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Gaetano Marano

246 Comments

  • 1657 Days Ago
  • 08/02/2007

NOT the BEST way to (really) find the Mars' life (if any) >>>

.
.

about robotic Mars missions...

I hope the Phoenix probe will be so lucky to land in the right place and find signs of present or ancient Mars' life right there

also, the (Mars's north pole) landing site (and its plenty of scientific tools and instruments) gives it the best chances

however, that kind of "single-shot" missions are not the right way to find life on Mars since the their main goal is "be lucky"

probably (but not sure) the (very very expensive) '70s Viking landers was already able to find the Mars life (if any) but could have given a negative result just because they landed in the wrong place (and had no wheels to go around)

if we REALLY want to have good chances to (finally) find the Mars life (again, if any) in a reasonable time (years, not decades) we need an international cooperation with enough funds to develop and build dozens (maybe, hundreds) standardized Phoenix-like (or better) probes with WHEELS to land in several difefrent places of Mars

that since the probability to find a still living form of life is very little, while, the Mars life (in really existed) should be in the form of fossils (and, maybe, very deep located ones) so we need many probes able to drill thousands places, collect different samples, crack them and examine with instruments and microscopes

the costs to start this program may seem high ...but not so high like those paid to develop the Ares-I...

however... GOOD LUCK PHOENIX ...and send us GOOD NEWS from Mars !!!

about the (future) MANNED Mars missions...

there is an interesting interview in the Aviation Week "On Space" by a former top manager of the Apollo program, Joseph P. Gavin, who led the development of the NASA/Grumman Apollo LEM, the lunar module, that (for those who don't know this) used a navigation/landing computer developed at M.I.T.

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/space/index.
jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&pl
ckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&pl
ckPostId=Blog%3a04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661
f385Post%3a25501416-6c2f-4a07-a2bd-fe099ccd0318

just add the parts of this long link in the URL bar of your browser or search the article from the blog's index: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/space/index.jsp

Mr. Gavin  believes (and suggests) that (both) Orion and Moon base should be scrapped in favor of even more emphasis on Mars (especially robotic Mars exploration)

I agree with him about the increasing of Moon/Mars/beyond robotic exploration (since it has relatively low costs and always give GREAT scientific results) but not with his proposal to (entirely) delete all Moon missions to jump now in the Mars adventure...

that from an ECONOMICAL point of view (if we REALLY want to go Mars, someday) as clearly explained in my COMMENT at end of the Aviation Week Blog article

.
.

Reply

martinaatayo

112 Comments

  • 1653 Days Ago
  • 08/06/2007

NASA Planetary-Astrobiological mission(s).

Whereas commendable successes have been made over the years on space and planetary explorattion, strategic exploitation remains to be fully developed and sufficiently applied.
That is why critical and analytical
thinkers continue to ask NASA why focus only on intelligence, exploratory and discovery missions, and not develop concrete experiments with modified favorable environmental conditions, unique to each planet, but capable of revealing progressive study of astro-planetary life supporting.. Uncertaintity oscillates between realism and abstract existentialism.
(In any doubt? contact: martin@mpgatechnology.com or  martinAtayo@aol.com

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Calxeda

Geron

Cellular Dynamics International

IBM

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement