Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Digging Deep on Mars

Continued from page 1

By David Chandler

Thursday, August 02, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

While TEGA can't tell the difference between organics resulting from chemical processes and those made by living organisms, it could at least provide enough information to allow researchers to decide whether its landing area is worthy of later exploration by landers equipped to search directly for traces of life. "If this is a region where organics can survive, it might be a region one could go back to with a roving mission to see if there are indications of life or not," Boynton says.

Although it's a long shot, TEGA might also be able to find more direct traces of life. Three different groups have reported the detection of methane gas in the Martian air, although the amounts are low and the evidence remains controversial. With luck, the Phoenix device might pick up those traces, especially if, as some researchers suggest, they may sometimes reach higher concentrations in some places. Methane in the air, since it breaks down quickly, would be a clear sign of a very active process--either current volcanism, which has not been detected there, or the metabolism of living organisms.

Phoenix, a project led by University of Arizona planetary scientist Peter Smith, will be the first planetary probe whose operations will be run from a university-based control room rather than a space-agency center. This is a step toward making planetary exploration a normal, operational process and taking it beyond the experimental development phase. A similar setup has worked well for the Chandra X-ray Observatory, which is run from a control center in Cambridge, MA, and operated by MIT.

Phoenix also represents an unusually inexpensive approach to such a complex mission, partly because it was able to make use of spacecraft and instruments developed for the Mars Polar Lander, which crash-landed in 2002, and from the Mars Surveyor Lander, a project that was canceled by NASA in 2001. This rebirth with parts from lost missions gave the new mission its name.

Scientists have been puzzled by Mars's ruddy soil ever since the Viking mission in 1976 investigated the planet from ground level for the first time. The results from the twin Viking landers, which have been heatedly debated ever since, suggested the presence of some powerful oxidizing agent on the soil surface that very quickly decomposes any organic compounds there--an environment highly toxic for life.

But many scientists suspect that just a few inches below the surface, things may be very different. Radar and gamma-ray inspections from orbiting spacecraft have revealed a layer of subsurface ice on much of the planet, in some places just a few inches deep. In the near-polar region where Phoenix will land, ice may extend more than a half-mile down, and parts of it may occasionally melt in certain seasons. It's a place where, if life ever gained a toehold on Mars, its last straggling microbes may have survived for eons, and where some might even persist today.

Comments

  • NOT the BEST way to (really) find the Mars' life (if any) >>>
    .
    .

    about robotic Mars missions...

    I hope the Phoenix probe will be so lucky to land in the right place and find signs of present or ancient Mars' life right there

    also, the (Mars's north pole) landing site (and its plenty of scientific tools and instruments) gives it the best chances

    however, that kind of "single-shot" missions are not the right way to find life on Mars since the their main goal is "be lucky"

    probably (but not sure) the (very very expensive) '70s Viking landers was already able to find the Mars life (if any) but could have given a negative result just because they landed in the wrong place (and had no wheels to go around)

    if we REALLY want to have good chances to (finally) find the Mars life (again, if any) in a reasonable time (years, not decades) we need an international cooperation with enough funds to develop and build dozens (maybe, hundreds) standardized Phoenix-like (or better) probes with WHEELS to land in several difefrent places of Mars

    that since the probability to find a still living form of life is very little, while, the Mars life (in really existed) should be in the form of fossils (and, maybe, very deep located ones) so we need many probes able to drill thousands places, collect different samples, crack them and examine with instruments and microscopes

    the costs to start this program may seem high ...but not so high like those paid to develop the Ares-I...

    however... GOOD LUCK PHOENIX ...and send us GOOD NEWS from Mars !!!

    about the (future) MANNED Mars missions...

    there is an interesting interview in the Aviation Week "On Space" by a former top manager of the Apollo program, Joseph P. Gavin, who led the development of the NASA/Grumman Apollo LEM, the lunar module, that (for those who don't know this) used a navigation/landing computer developed at M.I.T.

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/space/index.
    jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&pl
    ckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&pl
    ckPostId=Blog%3a04ce340e-4b63-4d23-9695-d49ab661
    f385Post%3a25501416-6c2f-4a07-a2bd-fe099ccd0318

    just add the parts of this long link in the URL bar of your browser or search the article from the blog's index: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/space/index.jsp

    Mr. Gavin  believes (and suggests) that (both) Orion and Moon base should be scrapped in favor of even more emphasis on Mars (especially robotic Mars exploration)

    I agree with him about the increasing of Moon/Mars/beyond robotic exploration (since it has relatively low costs and always give GREAT scientific results) but not with his proposal to (entirely) delete all Moon missions to jump now in the Mars adventure...

    that from an ECONOMICAL point of view (if we REALLY want to go Mars, someday) as clearly explained in my COMMENT at end of the Aviation Week Blog article

    .
    .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Gaetano Mara...
    08/02/2007
    Posts:124
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • NASA Planetary-Astrobiological mission(s).
    Whereas commendable successes have been made over the years on space and planetary explorattion, strategic exploitation remains to be fully developed and sufficiently applied.
    That is why critical and analytical
    thinkers continue to ask NASA why focus only on intelligence, exploratory and discovery missions, and not develop concrete experiments with modified favorable environmental conditions, unique to each planet, but capable of revealing progressive study of astro-planetary life supporting.. Uncertaintity oscillates between realism and abstract existentialism.
    (In any doubt? contact: martin@mpgatechnology.com or  martinAtayo@aol.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    martinaatayo
    08/06/2007
    Posts:43
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.