Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

New Record for Quantum Cryptography

Continued from page 1

By Neil Savage

Friday, June 08, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Encryption keys used today rely on the belief that it takes huge computing resources to break them, says Jeffrey Shapiro, of MIT's Optical and Quantum Communications Group. But if someone invents a vastly more powerful quantum computer, that advantage would be lost. In addition, the random sequences of numbers generated to make today's encryption keys aren't truly random. They're generated by mathematical operations, and a smart code breaker might be able to figure out the algorithm being used to generate them. Quantum bits, on the other hand, are completely unpredictable, so the keys based on them should be unbreakable. That's appealing to businesses that want to send financial data securely, as well as to governments, which have all sorts of sensitive communications. "We all know that the security of data is one of the essential issues these days," says Zeilinger.

"I think it's wonderful work," Shapiro says of the European group's paper. "The impressive thing about this is they've done it over such a long distance."

The best that researchers had previously done was to detect entangled photons across distances of about 10 kilometers. To improve on that, Zeilinger's team switched to a laser that emits light in pulses instead of a continuous beam. The pulsed laser only has a repetition rate of 249 megahertz--far slower than the 10 gigahertz lasers commonly used in optical communications networks, which limits how much of a signal can be sent in a given time period. The pulsed laser is also not quite as good as the continuous one at producing entanglement. But it's close, and it gave the team members much more control over when they were producing photons, which helped them separate the photons they wanted from stray light at the detector, so they could read the signal more reliably. The researchers also had to deal with atmospheric turbulence that distorts the photons' path. They used an automated system that continually adjusted the alignment of the telescope to take care of that, although the light beam still wandered over the detector somewhat.

The hope, Zeilinger says, is to improve the lasers and detectors enough that such free-space links work between ground stations and satellites, so that encryption keys can be sent from anyplace on Earth to any other. As most communications satellites orbit at heights of 300 to 500 kilometers, "with our 144 kilometers, we are getting there," he says.

The fact that the team covered that distance in free space "certainly is very significant," says Prem Kumar, director of the Center for Photonic Communication and Computing at Northwestern University. He has sent entangled photons over optical fiber, which is fine for short distances, he says. But because fiber absorbs photons, it's not practical for more than 100 to 200 kilometers, which wouldn't allow for worldwide distribution.

The researchers are part of a European consortium of about 20 groups, called SECOQC, working on secure communications based on quantum cryptography. The consortium aims to test a secure system in Europe sometime next year.

Comments

  • "automatically changes its partner" is misleading
    a lot of people have a hard time understanding why quantum entanglement doesnt violate special relativity (faster-than-light travel), and i think it's mostly due to wording like "Measuring any quantum mechanical property of one photon automatically changes that same property in its entangled partner"

    measuring your photon does not change the entangled photon, in the normal sense of the word "change". that might imply that the entangled photon was a 1 before, but since you measured a 0 on your photon, the other one just changed to 0 as well. that's not what's happening. either both are 1 or both or 0, but you dont know which is the case yet.

    the only weird part about this is that, in quantum mechanics, both of those 2 cases really do exist together until a measurement is made. both are 1 and both are 0 at the same time. when the measurement is made, 1 of those cases dissappears into nonexistence. which of the two is truly random.

    the best explanation i've heard of this is the many words theory. before the measurement, two words blur together: one in which both are 1 and one in which both are 0. when the measurement is made, those 2 worlds split and can never interact again.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    brunascle
    06/08/2007
    Posts:68
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
    I read, "If someone were to intercept the flying photons , he could measure them himself, then send them on to the receiver. But the act of measuring them would change their quantum mechanical properties, so he'd be immediately exposed."

    If I have the intelligence and dollars so that I can tap into the system and read it in the first place then I would argue that I also have the intelligence, dollars, and equipment to create from scratch that what I had just read.  It's not about continuing to pass along what I had just read, but rather stop what I had just read from continuing, and then recreating that from scratch and then putting that back into the flow stream to the final destination.

    It seems straightforward to me.  Am I missing something here?  I'm not yet convinced that it is 100% impossible to tap / crack into it.

    Your responses genuinely appreciated.

    Jim
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Science Jim
    06/08/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
      I think applying quantum entanglement for cryptography is like killing a fly with TNT.

      But if it payrolls research, so be it.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      71LesPaul
      06/10/2007
      Posts:1
    • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
      i'm a little confused on this part as well.

      i understand why intercepting the message would screw up the communication between point A and point B, but i dont see would you couldnt do a man-in-the-middle attack and set up a new communication between the attacker and point B.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brunascle
      06/11/2007
      Posts:68
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
        ah, as it turns out quantum cryptography _is_ vulnerable to this type of man-in-the-middle attack. both sides need to verify the other's identity before proceeding (probably by cryptographic signing, or something like that).

        more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
        Rate this comment: 12345

        brunascle
        06/11/2007
        Posts:68
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • if you can capture photons
    I don't understand everything with this technology.  But if you can capture the photons and intercept them.  Then couldn't you make it so that the photons can not reach the desired place?  Another words a terrorist or some other criminal org. might try to disrupt activity for some reason.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kujospam
    06/09/2007
    Posts:1
  • "the random sequences of numbers generated to make today's encryption keys aren't truly random"
    Maybe sometimes, but true random number generators are commercially available.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    06/09/2007
    Posts:126
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.