Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

New Record for Quantum Cryptography

Researchers take a big step toward their goal of spy-proof communications via satellites.

By Neil Savage

Friday, June 08, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

European scientists have broken a distance record for sending quantum information from one place to another, paving the way for a system that relies on the laws of physics to provide communications that can't be tapped. If they can extend the reach of their signal a little further, they'll be able to use satellites to send perfectly secure data around the world.

Long-distance call: Entangled photons were sent 144 kilometers from a light source on La Palma to a receiver on Tenerife (top) housed in a local observatory (bottom).
Credit: Institute for Experimental Physics, University of Vienna

The team used principles of quantum mechanics to create an encryption key in two locations simultaneously: one in a lab on La Palma, in the Canary Islands, and the second in an observatory on the neighboring island of Tenerife, 144 kilometers away. Such an encryption key can be used to encode data that only the sender and the receiver can decode.

"We want to see whether it is possible at all to establish worldwide quantum communication, worldwide quantum cryptography," says Anton Zeilinger, a professor of physics at the Institute for Experimental Physics at the University of Vienna, Austria. His team, along with a team led by Harald Weinfurter of the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, in Garching, Germany, published its results online on June 3 in the journal Nature Physics.

To create the key, the team first had to create pairs of entangled photons. Entanglement, which Albert Einstein called "spooky action at a distance," means that the fate of one photon is tied up with the fate of the other. Measuring any quantum mechanical property of one photon automatically changes that same property in its entangled partner, no matter the distance between them.

In this case, the team measured polarization. Light can be polarized in any direction; it's a measure of which direction the light waves are fluctuating in--horizontal or vertical, for example. Researchers created entangled pairs of photons by firing a powerful laser beam through a crystal. For each photon that went in, two weaker, entangled photons came out. The researchers bounced one half of each pair off a mirror to a local light detector on La Palma. They sent the other photon through a lens and out across the water, where a telescope on Tenerife caught it and sent it to a second light detector.

Story continues below

"I have these two photons, and if I measure them on both ends and I ask them, 'Are you horizontally or vertically polarized?'--a binary choice--they will give a random answer," says Zeilinger. "But because of the entanglement, both will give the same answer. On both sides you get a zero or on both sides you get a one."

Every time the detectors registered a photon and measured its polarization, that counted as a bit. A photon polarized in one direction was a one, and a photon polarized in the opposite direction was a zero. Add enough bits together, and you get an encryption key. And it's impossible to steal that key without the users' knowing about it. If someone were to intercept the flying photons , he could measure them himself, then send them on to the receiver. But the act of measuring them would change their quantum mechanical properties, so he'd be immediately exposed.

Comments

  • "automatically changes its partner" is misleading
    a lot of people have a hard time understanding why quantum entanglement doesnt violate special relativity (faster-than-light travel), and i think it's mostly due to wording like "Measuring any quantum mechanical property of one photon automatically changes that same property in its entangled partner"

    measuring your photon does not change the entangled photon, in the normal sense of the word "change". that might imply that the entangled photon was a 1 before, but since you measured a 0 on your photon, the other one just changed to 0 as well. that's not what's happening. either both are 1 or both or 0, but you dont know which is the case yet.

    the only weird part about this is that, in quantum mechanics, both of those 2 cases really do exist together until a measurement is made. both are 1 and both are 0 at the same time. when the measurement is made, 1 of those cases dissappears into nonexistence. which of the two is truly random.

    the best explanation i've heard of this is the many words theory. before the measurement, two words blur together: one in which both are 1 and one in which both are 0. when the measurement is made, those 2 worlds split and can never interact again.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    brunascle
    06/08/2007
    Posts:68
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
    I read, "If someone were to intercept the flying photons , he could measure them himself, then send them on to the receiver. But the act of measuring them would change their quantum mechanical properties, so he'd be immediately exposed."

    If I have the intelligence and dollars so that I can tap into the system and read it in the first place then I would argue that I also have the intelligence, dollars, and equipment to create from scratch that what I had just read.  It's not about continuing to pass along what I had just read, but rather stop what I had just read from continuing, and then recreating that from scratch and then putting that back into the flow stream to the final destination.

    It seems straightforward to me.  Am I missing something here?  I'm not yet convinced that it is 100% impossible to tap / crack into it.

    Your responses genuinely appreciated.

    Jim
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Science Jim
    06/08/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
      I think applying quantum entanglement for cryptography is like killing a fly with TNT.

      But if it payrolls research, so be it.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      71LesPaul
      06/10/2007
      Posts:1
    • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
      i'm a little confused on this part as well.

      i understand why intercepting the message would screw up the communication between point A and point B, but i dont see would you couldnt do a man-in-the-middle attack and set up a new communication between the attacker and point B.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      brunascle
      06/11/2007
      Posts:68
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
        ah, as it turns out quantum cryptography _is_ vulnerable to this type of man-in-the-middle attack. both sides need to verify the other's identity before proceeding (probably by cryptographic signing, or something like that).

        more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
        Rate this comment: 12345

        brunascle
        06/11/2007
        Posts:68
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • if you can capture photons
    I don't understand everything with this technology.  But if you can capture the photons and intercept them.  Then couldn't you make it so that the photons can not reach the desired place?  Another words a terrorist or some other criminal org. might try to disrupt activity for some reason.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kujospam
    06/09/2007
    Posts:1
  • "the random sequences of numbers generated to make today's encryption keys aren't truly random"
    Maybe sometimes, but true random number generators are commercially available.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    06/09/2007
    Posts:126
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.