Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cell-Phone Cameras That Zoom

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Blocking the lens, as the group has done, makes a tiny, fuzzy ring appear around an image. However, this ring is about a micrometer in diameter, and since most of the light sensors in cameras are only sensitive to a resolution of two micrometers, the ring is undetectable. "If you had a perfect detector with infinite resolution this would be a disaster," says Ford. "But it works well for the kind of sensors that we'd find for [digital cameras]."

The UCSD research takes advantage of a well-known optical system, says José Saisián, professor of optical sciences and astronomy at the University of Arizona, in Tucson, but he admits that the design is unique. "I think it has some merit," he says. "They took this idea, analyzed it well, and it can have some interesting applications."

Ford acknowledges that there were some drawbacks to the group's initial prototype. The first prototype had a limited depth of focus, for example, which meant that anything approximately two inches in front of or behind the focus point of the lens will appear blurry. However, he says, his team has explored different-shaped lenses that increase the depth of focus, and it has built successful camera prototypes. A second, smaller prototype, using a slice cut from a round lens, matched the depth of field of the conventional camera. Ford claims that the third generation imager, which is now being tested, will be even smaller. 

Comments

  • Good work but a waste of time
    The answer to good pictures in cellphones is more pixels and digital zoom. The trend in semiconductors including image sensors is to higher density. Using this technology to get a 3:1 zoom is OK, but installing 8 megapixels and using a 3:1 digital zoom will soon be less expensive and better.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dickcaro
    02/06/2007
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Good work but a waste of time
      Digital zoom although a cheaper option has some serious drawbacks. Since it uses the image interpolation technology, there is a drastic reduction in image quality. Even the higher resolution cannot address this issue since the actual image layout captured by the image sensors, cannot be regained. Secondly, working with digital zoom makes the images more prone to blurring due to slight movement of the camera while capturing the image.
      Hence this alternate design of the camera lens can offer better solutions to the cell phone industry.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      omarg
      02/07/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: Good work but a waste of time
        It think the previous comment about using say 8Mpix and digital zoom for 3 X was indicating that without interpolation this woudl lead to a theoretical resolution of 8 /sqrt 3 = 4.7Mpix.

        So very nearly the same resolution as zooming a 5Mpix sensor 3X. But nothing physically moves.
        It woudl not be more prone to hand shake effects than optical zoom, both magnify this.

        However the effect that neither correspondant has mentioned is that smaller pixels collect less light. The low light performance of an 8Mpix sensor in the same optical format as an 5Mpix woudl be worse.

        The same effect would be a problem with the research cited. The fact that 90% of light reflected off the top face may not make the image contrast look poor (although I find this difficult to believe), but it wodl most definitely affect the low light perfromance by a huge margin.

        I don't think it is a waste of time, but there are still problems to solve.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gaijin
        02/07/2007
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        • Re: Good work but a waste of time
          Using x3 digital zoom on an 8Mpixel sensor (3264 x 2448 say) you would get only 1/3^2 of the sensor resolution, so image size 1088 x 816. Zooming in to 4Mpixels only gives you x1.414 not x2, sorry (x2 would only give you a 2Mpixel image). You COULD zoom in further than 1 to 1, but you are not adding any new information, just adding more data points to a smaller and smaller raw image.

          Futher to the point about reduced sensitivity, another effect of the smaller pixel pitch is the lens can't resolve to that level. You could use bigger pixels, but that is more Silicon, more money, longer focal length so larger lens and shorter depth of field. Yet another issue is reduced full well capacity (means the best noise level that can be achieved is limited, the reason why higher and higher pixel count cameras are getting more noisy....).

          My question is, they say optical zoom. This needs a change in the characteristics of the optics, normally achieved by moving one of the lens elements. In this case, how is the 'zoom' actually achieved?

          I have checked this, sorry for any errors (especially spelling!).
          Rate this comment: 12345

          PeterPiper
          02/08/2007
          Posts:1
          Avg Rating:
          3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.