Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Part II: A Failure of Intelligence

Continued from page 2

By Freeman Dyson

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

There were two main reasons why Germany won the Battle of Berlin. First, the city is more modern and less dense than Hamburg, spread out over an area as large as London with only half of London's population; so it did not burn well. Second, the repeated attacks along the same routes allowed the German fighters to find the bomber stream earlier and kill bombers more efficiently.

A week after the final attack on Berlin, we suffered an even more crushing defeat. We attacked Nuremberg with 795 bombers and lost 94, a loss rate of almost 12 percent. It was then clear to everybody that such losses were unsustainable. Sir Arthur reluctantly abandoned his dream of winning the War by himself. Bomber Command stopped flying so deep into Germany and spent the summer of 1944 giving tactical support to the Allied armies that were, by then, invading France.

The history of the 20th century has repeatedly shown that strategic bombing by itself does not win wars. If Britain had decided in 1936 to put its main effort into building ships instead of bombers, the invasion of France might have been possible in 1943 instead of 1944, and the war in Europe might have ended in 1944 instead of 1945. But in 1943, we had the bombers, and we did not have the ships, and the problem was to do the best we could with what we had.

One of our group of young students at the ORS was Sebastian Pease, known to his friends as Bas. He had joined the ORS only six months before I had, but by the time I got there, he already knew his way around and was at home in that alien world. He was the only one of us who was actually doing what we were all supposed to be doing: helping to win the War. The rest of us were sitting at Command Headquarters, depressed and miserable because our losses of aircraft and aircrew were tremendous and we were unable to do much to help. The Command did not like it when civilians wandered around operational squadrons collecting information, so we were mostly confined to our gloomy offices at the headquarters. But Bas succeeded in breaking out. He spent most of his time with the squadrons and came back to headquarters only occasionally. Fifty years later, when he was visiting Princeton (where I spent most of my life, working as a professor of physics), he told me what he had been doing.

Bas was able to escape from Command Headquarters because he was the expert in charge of a precise navigation system called G-H. Only a small number of bombers were fitted with G-H, because it required two-way communication with ground stations. These bombers belonged to two special squadrons, 218 Squadron being one of them. The G-H bombers were Stirlings, slow and ponderous machines that were due to be replaced by the smaller and more agile Lancasters. They did not take part in mass-bombing operations with the rest of the Command but did small, precise operations on their own with very low losses. Bas spent a lot of time at 218 Squadron and made sure that the G-H crews knew how to use their equipment to bomb accurately. He had "a good war," as we used to say in those days. The rest of us were having a bad war.

Comments

  • I propose a variation on Smeed's law
    For collateral damage. Collateral damage will likewise equilibrate to a constant rate, as civilians in at-risk areas will compensate for an attacking force's measures to reduce collateral damage by taking greater risks until such risks become unacceptable to them.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    amulekii
    12/05/2006
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • [no subject]
    Interesting text, with a human touch. Mr. Dyson, I didn't live at that time, but it seems to me that British remembrances of WW1 days were not the trigger for bombing Dresden and others "when the war was already won". German attacks on London with V-1 and V-2 devices, causing 9,000 deaths from Jul/44 to Mar/45, more likely were.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    versatech
    12/05/2006
    Posts:1
  • US Highway Deaths and smeed's law
    Not sure if they are playing with the stats, but they seem to be going down.  I recall the deaths being in the mid-fifties years ago, when the population and number of cars were less.  Today it appears the number is in the low 40's.  http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/RNotes/2005/809897.pdf
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • Bomber's don't work
    Clinton proved that bombing does work in Bosnia.  The bombing side has to have control of the skies and the ability ro deliver munitions with more precision than existed in WWII.  On the other hand, the Israelis could not make this work in Lebanon.  They could not find enough of the missile depots to make the strategy effective.  They could not take out the leadership.  So the strategy still has its limits.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • So, where's the rest?
    Been waiting for parts III, IV, and V for this series but haven't seen them?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lescoulee
    12/18/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.