Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Part II: A Failure of Intelligence

Continued from page 1

By Freeman Dyson

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Smeed and I agreed that Bomber Command could substantially reduce losses by ripping out two gun turrets, with all their associated hardware, from each bomber and reducing each crew from seven to five. The gun turrets were costly in aerodynamic drag as well as in weight. The turretless bombers would have flown 50 miles an hour faster and would have spent much less time over Germany. The evidence that experience did not reduce losses confirmed our opinion that the turrets were useless. The turrets did not save bombers, because the gunners rarely saw the fighters that killed them. But our proposal to rip out the turrets went against the official mythology of the gallant gunners defending their crewmates. Dickins never had the courage to push the issue seriously in his conversations with Harris. If he had, Harris might even have listened, and thousands of crewmen might have been saved.

The part of his job that Smeed enjoyed most was interviewing evaders. Evaders were crew members who had survived being shot down over German-occupied countries and made their way back to England. About 1 percent of all those shot down came back. Each week, Smeed would go to London and interview one or two of them. Sometimes he would take me along. We were not supposed to ask them questions about how they got back, but they would sometimes tell us amazing stories anyway. We were supposed to ask them questions about how they were shot down. But they had very little information to give us about that. Most of them said they never saw a fighter and had no warning of an attack. There was just a sudden burst of cannon fire, and the aircraft fell apart around them. Again, we missed an essential clue that might have led us to Schräge Musik.

On November 18, 1943, Sir Arthur Harris started the Battle of Berlin. This was his last chance to prove the proposition that strategic bombing could win wars. He announced that the Battle of Berlin would knock Germany out of the War. In November 1943, Harris's bomber force was finally ready to do what it was designed to do: smash Hitler's empire by demolishing Berlin. The Battle of Berlin started with a success, like the first attack on Hamburg on July 24. We attacked Berlin with 444 bombers, and only 9 were lost. Our losses were small, not because of WINDOW, but because of clever tactics. Two bomber forces were out that night, one going to Berlin and one to Mannheim. The German controllers were confused and sent most of the fighters to Mannheim.

After that first attempt on Berlin, Sir Arthur ordered 15 more heavy attacks, expecting to destroy that city as thoroughly as he had destroyed Hamburg. All through the winter of 1943 and '44, the bombers hammered away at Berlin. The weather that winter was worse than usual, covering the city with cloud for weeks on end. Our photoreconnaissance planes could bring back no pictures to show how poorly we were doing. As the attacks went on, the German defenses grew stronger, our losses heavier, and the "scatter" of the bombs worse. We never raised a firestorm in Berlin. On March 24, in the last of the 16 attacks, we lost 72 out of 791 bombers, a loss rate of 9 percent, and Sir Arthur admitted defeat. The battle cost us 492 bombers with more than 3,000 aircrew. For all that, industrial production in Berlin continued to increase, and the operations of government were never seriously disrupted.

Comments

  • I propose a variation on Smeed's law
    For collateral damage. Collateral damage will likewise equilibrate to a constant rate, as civilians in at-risk areas will compensate for an attacking force's measures to reduce collateral damage by taking greater risks until such risks become unacceptable to them.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    amulekii
    12/05/2006
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • [no subject]
    Interesting text, with a human touch. Mr. Dyson, I didn't live at that time, but it seems to me that British remembrances of WW1 days were not the trigger for bombing Dresden and others "when the war was already won". German attacks on London with V-1 and V-2 devices, causing 9,000 deaths from Jul/44 to Mar/45, more likely were.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    versatech
    12/05/2006
    Posts:1
  • US Highway Deaths and smeed's law
    Not sure if they are playing with the stats, but they seem to be going down.  I recall the deaths being in the mid-fifties years ago, when the population and number of cars were less.  Today it appears the number is in the low 40's.  http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/RNotes/2005/809897.pdf
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • Bomber's don't work
    Clinton proved that bombing does work in Bosnia.  The bombing side has to have control of the skies and the ability ro deliver munitions with more precision than existed in WWII.  On the other hand, the Israelis could not make this work in Lebanon.  They could not find enough of the missile depots to make the strategy effective.  They could not take out the leadership.  So the strategy still has its limits.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • So, where's the rest?
    Been waiting for parts III, IV, and V for this series but haven't seen them?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lescoulee
    12/18/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.