Computing

Nanotube Computing Breakthrough

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Monday, October 30, 2006
  • By Kevin Bullis

The discovery came after the researchers noticed that the density changes depended on the type of surfactant they used, which led them to try combining multiple surfactants. They found that the right combinations could be used to exaggerate density disparities between nanotubes of different diameters, and also, surprisingly, disparities between semiconducting and metallic nanotubes. While they still have not identified the precise mechanism involved, the researchers believe it has to do with the marked difference in the ability of the semiconducting and metallic nanotube to be electrically polarized.

Andrew Rinzler, professor of physics at the University of Florida at Gainesville, says the method has produced "the best data I've seen so far." The resulting batches are pure enough, he says, for high-performance electronics. Indeed, Hersam says, the method can produce batches of semiconducting or metallic nanotubes with better than 99 percent purity.

What's more, the method has the potential to be scaled up for large-scale manufacturing. While the Northwestern researchers used lab-scale centrifuges capable of producing only milligrams of sorted nanotubes a day, Hersam says an industrial-scale centrifuge could purify 100,000 times as much. Large-scale manufacturing, he says, would involve running many of these centrifuges in parallel, twenty-four hours a day, with products removed and new batches added while the machines continue to spin.

Rinzler and Martel caution that the effectiveness of the method at a larger scale still needs to be demonstrated. Furthermore, Martel says, tests are needed to demonstrate that individual nanotubes are not damaged during the process. However, since surfactants don't typically cause damage to materials such as carbon nanotubes, he doesn't expect that this will be a problem.

Indeed, researchers are already making use of the new technique. In the Nature Nanotechnology paper, Hersam reports employing the method to make relatively simple transistors using thin-film meshes of semiconducting nanotubes. Such transistors could be useful for controlling pixels in computer monitors and flat-screen TVs.

At the same time, Martel is using the sorting technique to help produce transparent thin films made from a fine mesh of conductive nanotubes. These thin films could also be useful in some displays, replacing indium tin oxide electrodes, which are becoming more expensive as demand for them grows. Because of the superior conductivity of metallic carbon nanotubes, these films have the potential to improve the performance of organic solar cells, which also require transparent electrodes, Martel says.

The ultimate goal of computer chips that use single-nanotube transistors is years away--researchers still face the challenge of developing techniques for assembling millions of densely packed transistors and the connecting wires in intricate circuits. But the Northwestern advance could remove one of the basic obstacles to developing such nanotube-based electronics. "We find this very exciting," says Martel, "because we can push forward with our work."

Print

Related Articles

Record Performance for Printed Electronics

Nanotube circuits that combine speed and low power might drive flexible displays.

Practical Nanotube Electronics

Researchers develop a new method for making efficient nanotube transistor arrays.

Clear Carbon-Nanotube Films

Special sheets for bendable displays will soon hit the market.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

protn7

72 Comments

  • 1934 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2006

The above article is hyperbole

That sorting technology is not breakthrough in nanotube computing. It's a chemical refining method. Recently the Chinses hypered a supposed breakthrough in magnetic fusion. It's not what they advertised.

Reply

kitk

76 Comments

  • 1933 Days Ago
  • 10/31/2006

Re: The above article is hyperbole

Interesting, this sorting technique is a variation of exactly what has been used for concentrating metallic ores for over a century. Yet a 99% purity level is completely unacceptable for computing. The same for the cumbersome and slow assembly techniques. Still, this could be a time-saver in the research field. I am sure carbon computers are coming, but not for a while.

Reply

sobisch

1 Comment

  • 1933 Days Ago
  • 10/31/2006

Re: The above article is hyperbole

the last comment lead me to the suggestion that potentially floatation could also be a promissing technology after adjusting the properties of nanotubes by selective adsorption.
Unfortunately, no information was provided relating to the nature of surfactant combinations used to produce the density differences. I would speculate that because metallic and semiconductor nanotubes should have marked differences in their electronic structure surfactants like LAS with an aromatic moeity might be able to specifically interact with one form of carbon nanotubes. As common in floatation of ores surfactants or other additives with specific interaction might be designed.
I wondered that no reference was made in the article that there is already a way to sort the nanotubes based on alternating current electrophoresis developed by German researchers in 2003.(http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;301/5631/344)

Maybe both methods could be combined.

Kind regards
T. Sobisch
http://AppliedColloidsSurfactants.blogspot.com
http://www.AppliedColloidsSurfactants.info

Reply

billdale

15 Comments

  • 1892 Days Ago
  • 12/11/2006

unfair to call hyperbole

just because someone else has said something that you judge to be excessively enthusiastic-- and I doubt you have reason to say the magnetic fusion is really anything other than what they say it is-- is no reason to accuse the researchers at Northwest of exhuberance.  I offer both teams my heartiest moral support.
As for the different means the Germans and Northwest teams use, the team at Northwest is wise to have looked for other avenues to the same end.  Each approach can have specific advantages of speed, purity, cost, and other factors.  The technique at Northwest may have advantages in the area of less pollution byproduct, for instance.  Only as the procedures mature can such matters be evaluated.  As an American, I do hope the team here in the US will find their system of great value.
As for the product not being 100% pure and nanoscale circuits requiring complete purity, it may mean that there is simply a certain percentage of circuits that do not pass QC, much as LCD panels suffered years ago.  They were initially very expensive due to a low percentage of acceptable product, but they were still able to produce good panels. As processes improved,  acceptable yield increased, and costs dropped accordingly.  The same may be true of nanoscale circuits-- QC will determine yield and costs. 
My own area of interest lies in the use of CNTs for batteries and ultracapacitors.  Costs and energy densities need to improve dramatically for some applications, and Northwest's approach gives hope.  I do not think 100% purity in each batch will be absolutely necessary as it would be in attempting to make CNT-based computing devices.  There is an enormous number of potential apps for nanotubes of every flavor, and not all apps require absolute purity-- very good may be good enough. and therefore patentable and usable.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Nissan

Geron

HTC

Complete Genomics

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement