Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Nanotube Computing Breakthrough

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, October 30, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The discovery came after the researchers noticed that the density changes depended on the type of surfactant they used, which led them to try combining multiple surfactants. They found that the right combinations could be used to exaggerate density disparities between nanotubes of different diameters, and also, surprisingly, disparities between semiconducting and metallic nanotubes. While they still have not identified the precise mechanism involved, the researchers believe it has to do with the marked difference in the ability of the semiconducting and metallic nanotube to be electrically polarized.

Andrew Rinzler, professor of physics at the University of Florida at Gainesville, says the method has produced "the best data I've seen so far." The resulting batches are pure enough, he says, for high-performance electronics. Indeed, Hersam says, the method can produce batches of semiconducting or metallic nanotubes with better than 99 percent purity.

What's more, the method has the potential to be scaled up for large-scale manufacturing. While the Northwestern researchers used lab-scale centrifuges capable of producing only milligrams of sorted nanotubes a day, Hersam says an industrial-scale centrifuge could purify 100,000 times as much. Large-scale manufacturing, he says, would involve running many of these centrifuges in parallel, twenty-four hours a day, with products removed and new batches added while the machines continue to spin.

Rinzler and Martel caution that the effectiveness of the method at a larger scale still needs to be demonstrated. Furthermore, Martel says, tests are needed to demonstrate that individual nanotubes are not damaged during the process. However, since surfactants don't typically cause damage to materials such as carbon nanotubes, he doesn't expect that this will be a problem.

Indeed, researchers are already making use of the new technique. In the Nature Nanotechnology paper, Hersam reports employing the method to make relatively simple transistors using thin-film meshes of semiconducting nanotubes. Such transistors could be useful for controlling pixels in computer monitors and flat-screen TVs.

At the same time, Martel is using the sorting technique to help produce transparent thin films made from a fine mesh of conductive nanotubes. These thin films could also be useful in some displays, replacing indium tin oxide electrodes, which are becoming more expensive as demand for them grows. Because of the superior conductivity of metallic carbon nanotubes, these films have the potential to improve the performance of organic solar cells, which also require transparent electrodes, Martel says.

The ultimate goal of computer chips that use single-nanotube transistors is years away--researchers still face the challenge of developing techniques for assembling millions of densely packed transistors and the connecting wires in intricate circuits. But the Northwestern advance could remove one of the basic obstacles to developing such nanotube-based electronics. "We find this very exciting," says Martel, "because we can push forward with our work."

Comments

  • The above article is hyperbole
    That sorting technology is not breakthrough in nanotube computing. It's a chemical refining method. Recently the Chinses hypered a supposed breakthrough in magnetic fusion. It's not what they advertised.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    10/30/2006
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: The above article is hyperbole
      Interesting, this sorting technique is a variation of exactly what has been used for concentrating metallic ores for over a century. Yet a 99% purity level is completely unacceptable for computing. The same for the cumbersome and slow assembly techniques. Still, this could be a time-saver in the research field. I am sure carbon computers are coming, but not for a while.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      10/31/2006
      Posts:65
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: The above article is hyperbole
        the last comment lead me to the suggestion that potentially floatation could also be a promissing technology after adjusting the properties of nanotubes by selective adsorption.
        Unfortunately, no information was provided relating to the nature of surfactant combinations used to produce the density differences. I would speculate that because metallic and semiconductor nanotubes should have marked differences in their electronic structure surfactants like LAS with an aromatic moeity might be able to specifically interact with one form of carbon nanotubes. As common in floatation of ores surfactants or other additives with specific interaction might be designed.
        I wondered that no reference was made in the article that there is already a way to sort the nanotubes based on alternating current electrophoresis developed by German researchers in 2003.(http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;301/5631/344)

        Maybe both methods could be combined.

        Kind regards
        T. Sobisch
        http://AppliedColloidsSurfactants.blogspot.com
        http://www.AppliedColloidsSurfactants.info
        Rate this comment: 12345

        sobisch
        10/31/2006
        Posts:1
        • unfair to call hyperbole
          just because someone else has said something that you judge to be excessively enthusiastic-- and I doubt you have reason to say the magnetic fusion is really anything other than what they say it is-- is no reason to accuse the researchers at Northwest of exhuberance.  I offer both teams my heartiest moral support.
          As for the different means the Germans and Northwest teams use, the team at Northwest is wise to have looked for other avenues to the same end.  Each approach can have specific advantages of speed, purity, cost, and other factors.  The technique at Northwest may have advantages in the area of less pollution byproduct, for instance.  Only as the procedures mature can such matters be evaluated.  As an American, I do hope the team here in the US will find their system of great value.
          As for the product not being 100% pure and nanoscale circuits requiring complete purity, it may mean that there is simply a certain percentage of circuits that do not pass QC, much as LCD panels suffered years ago.  They were initially very expensive due to a low percentage of acceptable product, but they were still able to produce good panels. As processes improved,  acceptable yield increased, and costs dropped accordingly.  The same may be true of nanoscale circuits-- QC will determine yield and costs. 
          My own area of interest lies in the use of CNTs for batteries and ultracapacitors.  Costs and energy densities need to improve dramatically for some applications, and Northwest's approach gives hope.  I do not think 100% purity in each batch will be absolutely necessary as it would be in attempting to make CNT-based computing devices.  There is an enormous number of potential apps for nanotubes of every flavor, and not all apps require absolute purity-- very good may be good enough. and therefore patentable and usable.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          billdale
          12/11/2006
          Posts:15
          Avg Rating:
          4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Microsoft's Many Multitouch Mice
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.