Computerized Voter Registration Databases Need a Major OverhaulPolitical scientist Thad Hall says federal standards are required to prevent state electronic registration databases from disenfranchising people.
What Americans should be most worried about this November, say elections experts like Thad Hall, a political scientist at the University of Utah, is not that someone might hack the Diebold machine they're using to vote--but that their names might disappear from the rolls entirely. According to him, the greatest risks of fraud or disenfranchisement concern voter registration.
As Hall spells out in a report for the IBM Center for Business and Government, voter registration databases are difficult to maintain because there are no electronic standards for creating them. That makes it hard for elections officials to compare their databases with motor-vehicle registries and prison records--let alone other states' elections records. Earlier this year, the state of Kentucky was sued by its attorney general for attempting to remove 8,000 voters from the rolls--without notifying them--based on a comparison of its database with those in Tennessee and South Carolina, in search of voters registered in multiple states. Hall says that if the state had not been sued, many voters would have been disenfranchised because of database errors. Until 2002, when Congress passed the Help America Vote Act in response to mistakes made in administering the 2000 presidential election, the federal government had never spent any money on election administration. Hall, co-author of Point, Click, and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting, explains why Congress should now go further and give the federal government the power to enforce electronic elections standards. Technology Review: What requirements does the Help America Vote Act set for voter registration databases? Thad Hall: It just requires there to be statewide voter registration databases. It does not define what such a database is, and it does not provide any standards for certifying these systems or providing for their interoperability. The idea behind it is straightforward: you want states to have common databases so that at least within a state you should be able to know if a person has moved, and you can keep the records within a state accurate. But without common formats it becomes difficult even to do that. The problem we run into is that there are no standards for the way to format these data. There's no standard to handle something as simple as a hyphenated last name. What that means is you can't compare data lists, you can't transfer data among two databases very easily, because all the record formats are unique. That creates big problems. In California, for example, the Cal Voter File doesn't accept hyphenated or two-word last names like Benito Del Toro. If the California elections officials try and do a database comparison, or "match," with the Department of Motor Vehicles in California, his name kicks out because there are no standard data formats.
|










Comments
they have not hacked all states.
We complain about the "monoculture" of windows,
but will listen to this bozo wanting to create
a federal system?!?!? Is there much more that
you want D.C. to control?
Let them define an XML schema, and go away.
SirLanse
10/16/2006
Posts:43
But there is another significant issue, and that is that these state voter registration databases were built without any detailed design guidelines in place nationally. Hence, in order to meet the deadlines of HAVA, election officials from each state were forced to address schema design and data migration issues simultaneously, without any precedent or model. Now, while we're uncertain just how well designed these schemas are, we are certain that data normalization & accuracy remains a big issue.
In any event, I also agree that we don't need the FED's to enter the arena to address the issues currently faced. Some best practices, a communication standard, and regular external independent reviews (audits) of these voter registration databases will go a long way toward improving the situation.
stevensteven...
10/16/2006
Posts:1
The problem with state-wide voter registration databases is the inconsistent source of the information. As stated, incorrect information is often provided by the voters themselves - sometimes by accident (transposing numbers from their drivers license or SSN) or intentionally (particularly in the case of birth dates).
I've been involved in the implementation of 6 statewide systems. The structures behind each of those systems varies based on local standards and requirements, as well as historic parameters (what has traditionally been stored on varying county systems).
The Feds have no idea what's necessary. These requirements are driven from the bottom up (local jurisdictions who have been running elections for years to state officials working to enforce state and federal standards). Having the Feds trying to dictate standards from their lofty perch can only make things worse.
Jvarner75
10/16/2006
Posts:1
clearbell
10/17/2006
Posts:1
The benefits of a biometric enabled Smart Card Solution is obvious. Portable easy to update if you just relocate and the identification by a personal trait. Only a tracking number is required on the card to justify that you are enlisted somewhere in the States as an elligible voter.
rdujardin
10/17/2006
Posts:1