Revolutionizing FootballNew computer modeling software could make gridiron coaches rethink their decisions and look to science for guidance.
A startup venture, EndGame Technologies, has designed novel computer modeling software to assist National Football League coaches with critical play-calling decisions--the kind that often determine the outcome of the game. Should a team punt on fourth down--or go for it? Or attempt a two-point conversion after a touchdown? The software, called ZEUS, is designed to answer such questions by calculating the consequences of each decision in a matter of seconds.
Head ZEUS researchers Chuck Bower and Frank Frigo want to revolutionize football by changing the way plays are called. Already, their statistics on past NFL games have revealed that teams consistently lose approximately one game per season by making the wrong play calls in critical situations. And with only 16 games in an NFL season, each win or loss is of paramount importance. Football is a game of strategy and risk management. Each coach goes into a game with a plan, explains Dwight Smith, head football coach at MIT. Although every variable is considered beforehand, adjustments have to be made as the game progresses. ZEUS is meant to help coaches make those on-the-fly decisions. The software was created by mining historical NFL data and developing distribution curves of success rates for individual actions, such as how far a running back carries the ball. Coaches could use ZEUS at any point in the game, by entering a set of variables, such as the score, field position, possession, down, and time remaining on the clock. Then the user enters two play-call options and the software analyzes each one separately, playing the game to its conclusion 100,000 times. During each iteration, ZEUS considers a different scenario. All the decisions about play calls that occur after the initial play are based on historical NFL data. This data isn't specific to a particular coach, though; it's based on records from a wide variety of coaches. (The researchers call this algorithm the "generic" NFL coach.) In a matter of seconds, ZEUS displays the Game Winning Chance--the play that gives the team the highest probability of winning. Unlike interactive football simulations, which require about the same amount of time to play out as a real game, ZEUS performs its calculations and recommendations in real time, displaying the computer's results before the next snap. According to Bower, the challenge for them now lies not in the technology, but in getting NFL teams to adopt it. "We have shown it to 10 NFL teams, [everyone] from managers to head coaches," he says. "But at this point no one has stepped forward and said we are ready to pay for the product." The problem: ZEUS is still illegal under NFL guidelines. The league doesn't permit computers on the sidelines or in the coach's booth on game day. Although there are no restrictions on using high-tech analytical tools off the field, the traditional elements of strategy continue to be preserved on game day. |










Comments
Phineas
08/31/2006
Posts:85
Coyle Can Bo...
08/31/2006
Posts:1
Maybe the NFL should just stop paying all of the players altogether. Then each NFL team would just have to pay a coach. The NFL streamed across televisions would be completely virtual. Coaches would button mash it out on an Xbox360 against other competing teams. Just kidding of course.
Seriously though, when you introduce a technology into a game that can change the outcome you are undermining the basic principals of how the game should be played in the first place. In football or any sport for that matter, the idea of placing someone in the position of a coach is that they get to make all of the team calls based on their knowledge of the game and expirence. Yes I’m sure someone could make a computer that can make the calls for them, but then why have a coach at all? Why don’t we just determine the best play for each team and let them execute. I would estimate to say that a coach and the decisions he makes for the team weigh about 20% overall, against the teams actual performance. When you have Coach Program v1.0 running on both sides of the team it’s only about the players.
What’s next? Players being bio-scanned during the game to weigh their actual performance so that Coach Program v1.0 can make better plays based on what kind of performance it’s players are capable of?
hunterrose12
08/31/2006
Posts:1
trythis
08/31/2006
Posts:1
Competitive sports is all about using technology to change the limits of performance ...
jrichardstev...
09/05/2006
Posts:1
This goes against every instinct you have that they will fake the punt and try for a first down. You have the dilemma of going with science or gut. What DO you do?
Phineas
08/31/2006
Posts:85
Winstons
09/02/2006
Posts:2
ZEUS in no way encroaches on the artistry of the coach. The game will always be human vs human on the field. Technology is an essential part of all competitive games whether on a board or a gridiron. Early adopters of proven technologies have a distinct advantage over the competition until the playing field levels. Such is the case in NFL.
For more information on ZEUS, interested readers may visit www.pigskinrevolution.com
Frank Frigo
President, End Game Technologies
frigo
09/02/2006
Posts:1
http://florence20.typepad.com/renaissance/2005/08/technology_inno_4.html
vmirchan
09/05/2006
Posts:2
in response to a few comments, i don't think that it will ever replace the football game though. it doesn't account for human error - a 400lb guy squashing a tiny 220 lb running back. someone landing wrong on his ankle. a team having a bad day. a death in the family of one of the players.
but since i'm highly into the bi/datamining side of things - i think this is an amazing tool that i definitely would use if i got my hands on it (mainly for the fact that i could sound like i know something when watching football with a bunch of friends).
i think that the NFL should allow it in the future. you look at baseball, and the players there are using video ipods and other video handhelds to preview different pitchers, batters, plays run by the opposing team. technology is taking away the innocence of human error - the big question is do we let it ... or do we slow it down.
roadieGirl
09/06/2006
Posts:2
if a coach wanted to see the risk or likelihood of making a first down or kicking the field goal the coach on the opposite side of the field could do exactly the same thing> would the coaches then not be back at square one? is this the same kind of technology used when weighing up to give someone health insurance??
domgould54
03/14/2007
Posts:1