Computing

A Quantum Encryption Breakthrough

This new technique dupes eavesdroppers.

  • Friday, March 3, 2006
  • By Kate Greene

Researchers at the University of Toronto have shown, in a study published in the February 24 issue of Physical Review Letters, that one of the present liabilities of quantum cryptography can be turned into an advantage. Using "quantum decoys," Professor Hoi-Kwong Lo and his team are increasing the distance that quantum-encrypted data can be sent over fiber-optic cable.

Quantum cryptography uses particles of light called photons to create and send keys used for coding and decoding messages. A photon can transmit bits of a key by representing a 1 or 0, depending on a property called polarization. The sender of this key (physicists call her "Alice") transmits a string of randomly polarized single photons to the recipient ("Bob"), who collects each photon, one at a time.

Advertisement

The reason this technique is so secure is that photons possess a safeguard inherent in quantum mechanics. For an eavesdropper to listen in, he or she must tap the fiber-optic line and measure the polarization of the photons with a detector as the photons arrive. But quantum mechanics dictates that any measurement, such as the one taken by the eavesdropper, unavoidably modifies the polarization. This means that Bob would notice if a transmission had been intercepted -- as soon as he and Alice compared notes (over a channel that doesn't need to be secure) about the polarization of photons sent and received. Any inconsistency in the sent and received photons would alert them to the fact that the key had been stolen.

A problem arises, however, when more than a single photon is inadvertently sent at a time -– a common occurrence since no perfect single photon emitter exists. This happens, says Jonathan Habif, quantum information research scientist at BBN Technologies, because scientists send pulses of laser light through a series of filters until only one photon squeezes through; but the filtering process isn't perfect, and sometimes more than one photon per pulse gets through.

When two photons of the same polarization are sent, one of them can be picked off by the eavesdropper, while the other one will go through unchanged, as if nothing is amiss. Additionally, Habif says, in order to send a quantum-encrypted key farther, the initial light from the laser must be more intense, which means there must be more photons to begin with, thus increasing the likelihood that more than one photon will squeak through the filters.

Print

Related Articles

Toward a Quantum Internet

A quantum logic gate in an optical fiber could lay the foundation for a quantum computer network.

Making Quantum Practical

Researchers have succeeded in combining quantum signals with classical optical signals in a conventional fiber-optic line.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Silicon Valley Sender)

  • 2175 Days Ago
  • 03/03/2006

I don't get it

Now let me see.  If I use sets of polarized quantum photons of nearly, if not identical frequency assigned with known sets acting as decoys and if any of  the non-decoy sets (the real McCoy) are not polarizedly correct then I know of foul play.  Now I think I know how it works.

Reply

Guest (Silicon Valley receiver)

  • 2175 Days Ago
  • 03/03/2006

Got it!

It doesn't work.  What I got was gramatically incorrect, so the message doesn't mean diddly?  I mean hey, McCoys, decoys, light strings, quantum light that gets bent out of shape by criminals, no less.  Yep, sounds like the Government.  Not Alice but AliCIA.  BTW, what's a Texa?

Reply

Guest (Colin)

  • 2174 Days Ago
  • 03/04/2006

Brew That Is True?

Reciever: The Chalace from the palace holds the brew that is true?

Sender: No! They broke the chalace from the palace. The pellet with the poison is in the vesel with the pestle. The flagon with the dragon holds the brew that is true. Get it?

Reciever: Got it.

Sender: Good.

Users: Thank goodness for quantum encription.

Reply

Guest (Giacomo)

  • 2163 Days Ago
  • 03/15/2006

In the light

If you hold the light juuusst right...

It looks like a purple pimpernel.

Reply

Guest (Silicon Valley Interceptor)

  • 2175 Days Ago
  • 03/03/2006

Get it?

Shouldn't it be identically frequent rather than identical frequency?  Am I being coherent? or am I coherent?  Guess it depends if infinitive or here and now.  Is it sometimes right being wrong?  Before enLIGHTenment carrying water and chopping wood.  After enLIGHTenment chopping wood and carrying water (or vice versa?).  Is it contiguity or ambiguity, the real decoy or just a bunch of McCoys. 
Well, where are you Hatfields?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Akamai

ARM Holdings

Siemens

eSolar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement