Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Repetez, en anglais, s'il vous plait

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is one of the major funders of statistical machine translation. Last August, DARPA sponsored machine translation tests for Chinese and Arabic documents; a research group from Google scored the highest, nudging out USC’s Information Sciences Institute and IBM’s machine translation arm. Google, which also uses the statistical approach, might have had an edge, Knight notes, because they could use a huge number of computers for the word-crunching, and could draw from the entire Internet for their database of pretranslated documents.

In 2005, DARPA also announced the Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE) program, intended to speed up the computer processing of huge numbers of translated documents acquired by its parent program, the Philadelphia-based Linguistic Data Consortium.** GALE is currently in the first year and will be transcribing speech from broadcast news sources and talk shows in Arabic, Chinese, and English, and also cataloguing text newswire feeds, Web news discussion groups, and blogs in those languages. For now, the project is focused mainly on data collection from these genres, with researchers in the computer and engineering science department at the University of Pennsylvania doing much of the work.

But even with a large collection of translated material, there will still be language issues to sort out. The next step in machine translation research, beyond matching words and phrases, Knight says, is to smooth out the grammatical inconsistencies that arise when words and phrases are strung together. This smoothing can be accomplished by indexing millions of sentences whose structures have been diagrammed at the University of Pennsylvania in the 1990s (the data came from 50,000 sentences in the Wall Street Journal). Similar to the way a database full of words and phrases allows translation software to choose the most statistically probable combination of words, these specific examples of grammar from the diagrammed sentences help the software assign the likelihood of word order, says MIT’s Collins.

This is an advance over the traditional method in which grammar rules were set in an algorithm, he says. Rather than obeying encoded grammar conventions in an algorithm, as with traditional machine translation, the diagrammed sentence database lets the software assign “probabilities and weight on those rules” says Collins. “[The software] is more likely to learn the context,” he says.

In some ways, however, the statistical approach will only be as good as the common instant-messaging translator. Proper names, for instance, still trip up even the most well-read machine translator, and they often just get translated along with the rest of the text. According to his system, Knight admits, the Spanish version of his surname is still “Kevin Caballero.”

** Correction, January 20, 2006: The original version of this story, published January 18, stated that the Linguistic Data Consortium was launched in 2005. In fact, the consortium was launched in 1992, and its Global Autonomous Language Exploitation project was launched in 2005. -- Eds.

Comments

  • Wrong Example from the beginning of the Article
    Go to the Japanese Apple Farm Web site, and look carefully. You will find out that the example given from the beginning is actually (most likely) a human translation--because it is part of the English version of the site.

    Go to the Japanese version and use Google Translate, you will get this:
    "The Someya apple garden it will pass very! It is planted in 1954, furthermore even now, .... " Much more unintelligible.

    Admittedly a simple mistake. But well, if this esteemed magazine gets such very basics wrong, how can we trust it with more complicated stuff it routinely tries to cover!
    (A high-profile example is the obviously highly biased coverage of Aubrey de Grey's work. By the way, when are you going to publish the result of SENS challenge?)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Pat)
    01/18/2006
    Posts:1
    • LDC info wrong
      The para about the LDC is simply wrong.  The LDC has been around for 13 years; I worked there until September.  (See their website at http://www.ldc.upenn.edu.)

      There are other errors, too, some of them trivial ("Kevin Caballero" is not a surname--only "Caballero" is a surname, "millions of sentences" should be "millions of words", etc.).  But all in all, I would say they need better fact checking.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Mike Maxwell)
      01/18/2006
      Posts:1
      • Répétez...
        If the aim is to have a good translation, the title should be: "Répétez, en anglais, s'il vous plaît".
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Benoit Ozell)
        01/18/2006
        Posts:1
    • Error corrected
      Pat: Thank you for helping us to catch this mistake. We have corrected it, and appended an explanation of the error at the bottom of the article. -- Wade Roush, Executive Web Editor, TechnologyReview.com.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Wade Roush)
      01/18/2006
      Posts:1
  • Error correction still unclear
    From the Correction:

    "...an excerpt from Google's translation of the apple farm's own English version of its website..."

    I don't get it.  Google is translating English into English?  Shouldn't that be "...an excerpt from the apple farm's own English version of its website..."?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mike Maxwell)
    01/18/2006
    Posts:1
    • Mis-spellings
      Surely it should have been obvious that it was a human translation, since the spelling was so bad - "temperture", "uniquly" and "delitious", and equally clear that it is a translation by someone who is not a native English-speaker - i.e. not even a Google human translation, but rather home-grown at the Japanese Apple Farm. A correction to the correction is definitely in order as per Mike's comment.

      Interesting article though! :)
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Andrew Mole)
      01/19/2006
      Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.