Computing

Losing the Right to Tinker?

The new year could see new challenges to hardware reverse engineering.

  • Tuesday, December 27, 2005
  • By Kevin Bullis

Tech-savvy recipients of an Xbox 360 this season might want to take it apart and solder in a few modification chips, maybe even convert the gaming console into a PC, if past tinkering with the original Xbox is any indication. And consumers with new mobile phones might be looking for someone clever to give them a way to transfer all their contacts from their old phone.

Reverse engineering hardware is a time-honored tradition, made famous in the early days of the semiconductor industry. This coming year, however, there could be more efforts to restrict this practice -- a shift that would affect both hackers and general consumers, who might want the freedom to, say, switch between different mp3 players and digital video recorders for their TVs.

Advertisement

Of course, attempts at restricting what can be done with hardware in part have to do with protecting copyrighted material. Last week, for instance, three Californians men were arrested for making and selling Xbox consoles modified to run pirated games, adding to the list of crackdowns under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a law that, in part, prohibits circumventing copyright protection technology. The Xbox hack was ultimately made possible by reverse engineering the game console's chip set.

The most disturbing aspect of reverse engineering, however, at least for businesses, is that the concept can easily be linked to hackers and garage cowboys looking to modify their devices without worrying about the law.

But reverse engineering is also essential for companies competing in the semiconductor industry.

Indeed, some firms specialize in analyzing a new technology and selling reports on the results to industry players. Last month, for example, Chipworks, a Canadian reverse-engineering company, announced it had analyzed the key chips of the Xbox 360.

Chipworks has reverse engineered thousands of chips in its 12-year history, according to the company's senior technology analyst, Dick James. And they sell these reports to all the major manufacturers worldwide, he says.

The company insists what it does is entirely legal, and not just in Canada. Andrea Girones, patent advisor at Chipworks, points to the U. S. Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984, created to protect companies against the copying of chip designs. It contains a section specifying that reverse engineering a competitor's chips is legal for the purpose of making products compatible with it -- or even for producing a better competing product.

A congressional committee report on the act explains that reverse engineering is "an accepted practice in the semiconductor chip industry whereby a competitor studies and analyzes an existing chip in order to try to make an improved or related version." In short, reverse engineering hardware has been considered legal as long as it didn't involve copying someone's chip design.

Print

Related Articles

The Root of the Problem

Sony BMG's disastrous use of rootkit software has taught us a valuable lesson: we're too trusting of commercial software.

Linus's World

How open-source god Linus Torvalds got his groove back after a mini-insurrection among Linux insiders.

Hack License

Recent books struggle to define hacking and its economic and social legitimacy.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Erik Karl Sorgatz)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Tinkering Rights

Shall we face it? In letting Congress pass the Electronic Privacy Control Act of 1986, Americans surrendured their freedoms under the Communications Act of 1934 which empowered them to listen into anything in the electromagnetic spectrum - now if its Pay Service, you cannot tinker with it - the Xbox might be next..face it: Corporations have more rights than people because the corporations have maded if very lucrative for our legislators to bend the laws into this form. The Corporation (as Person) has more rights than a real human and less liabilities - its time for some changes.

Reply

Guest (Erik Karl Sorgatz)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Tinkering Rights

Shall we face it? In letting Congress pass the Electronic Privacy Control Act of 1986, Americans surrendured their freedoms under the Communications Act of 1934 which empowered them to listen into anything in the electromagnetic spectrum - now if its Pay Service, you cannot tinker with it - the Xbox might be next..face it: Corporations have more rights than people because the corporations have maded if very lucrative for our legislators to bend the laws into this form. The Corporation (as Person) has more rights than a real human and less liabilities - its time for some changes.

Reply

Guest (grey eminence)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Stealing is Stealing, Reverse Eng. or Not

I for one will be glad when most engineers and scientist have to think for themselves to create unique ideas.

Reply

Guest (Jack Vaughan)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Back to the future

Think back: There was a certain art to reverse engineering. Chips &amp Technology was good at it, then ended up back in the mother ship [Intel]. What about Compaq? Where would the world be if they hadnt gone backward? The act of taking things apart can be as creative as putting things together. Still, it looks like the days of going to a white room and sequestration rituals are numbered. Maybe it is time for the notion of second source to reappear. That was something that government and corporations both once insisted upon.

Reply

Guest (Steve Huston)

  • 2239 Days Ago
  • 12/29/2005

Examples from the non-Tech Industry

I cant help but compare the technology industry of today to the automotive industry 50 to 70 years ago.  Take the classic hot rod.  Some people took a stock car, figured out what made it work, thought up some improvements and applied them to their purchased vehicles.  Imagine what kind of cars we would be driving today if car companies had set up legal barriers preventing car owners from tinkering with their vehicles.  Technology should have the same freedom for development--both the freedom of risks from companies whos technology may be made obsolete by some pimple-faced junior higher who happens to be good with electronics, as well as the risk of the consumer who might break their $200 toy while trying to improve it.

Reply

Guest (Tom)

  • 2193 Days Ago
  • 02/13/2006

it's just ain't the same no more

Holy s##t I agree.  Everybody, but the people themselves have the rights.   The government is into our lives way too much and is going completely against what America was founded for.  I can't even walk to a friends house at night without getting surrounded by 10 cops thinking I'm going to break into something.  Freedom as I knew it is gone.  The corporate world is just the same and they can suck it dry as far as I'm concerned.  I hold no respect for the "public authority" any longer and I haven't for a quite a while.  It's time America became America again.  It's time to go back to old ways.  This new s##t has got to go.

Reply

Guest (Steve Huston)

  • 2239 Days Ago
  • 12/29/2005

Examples from the non-Tech Industry

I cant help but compare the technology industry of today to the automotive industry 50 to 70 years ago.  Take the classic hot rod.  Some people took a stock car, figured out what made it work, thought up some improvements and applied them to their purchased vehicles.  Imagine what kind of cars we would be driving today if car companies had set up legal barriers preventing car owners from tinkering with their vehicles.  Technology should have the same freedom for development--both the freedom of risks from companies whos technology may be made obsolete by some pimple-faced junior higher who happens to be good with electronics, as well as the risk of the consumer who might break their $200 toy while trying to improve it.

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Jack Vaughan)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Back to the future

Think back: There was a certain art to reverse engineering. Chips &amp Technology was good at it, then ended up back in the mother ship [Intel]. What about Compaq? Where would the world be if they hadnt gone backward? The act of taking things apart can be as creative as putting things together. Still, it looks like the days of going to a white room and sequestration rituals are numbered. Maybe it is time for the notion of second source to reappear. That was something that government and corporations both once insisted upon.

Reply

Guest (Erik Karl Sorgatz)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Tinkering Rights

Shall we face it? In letting Congress pass the Electronic Privacy Control Act of 1986, Americans surrendured their freedoms under the Communications Act of 1934 which empowered them to listen into anything in the electromagnetic spectrum - now if its Pay Service, you cannot tinker with it - the Xbox might be next..face it: Corporations have more rights than people because the corporations have maded if very lucrative for our legislators to bend the laws into this form. The Corporation (as Person) has more rights than a real human and less liabilities - its time for some changes.

Reply

Guest (grey eminence)

  • 2241 Days Ago
  • 12/27/2005

Stealing is Stealing, Reverse Eng. or Not

I for one will be glad when most engineers and scientist have to think for themselves to create unique ideas.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Sponsored Content

Technologies from National Instruments

Adding Data Logging
Log measured data to a file and open it in Microsoft Excel

> Click here for more National Instruments Videos <
Whitepaper

Temperature Measurements with Thermocouples: How-To Guide

This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.

View full PDF > Listen to story >
Find us on Youtube

Videos

A Robot Recruit that Can Do It All

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

BrightSource Energy

Goldwind Science and Technology

eSolar

Complete Genomics

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement