Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Multicore Mania

Continued from page 1

By Laurianne McLaughlin

Thursday, December 15, 2005

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Programmers have already built multithreading into Windows XP, Linux, and the Mac OS X operating systems, so they can throw the power of one CPU at system background tasks and the other CPU at, for instance, a demanding application such as displaying video. On the other hand, many application vendors, including game makers, haven’t revised their applications yet.

“We have multi-threaded software in scalable server applications today, but it is rarer in client applications” for desktop computers, Krewell says. “Adobe has embraced multithreading for content creation software, including Adobe Photoshop; but most other application software companies haven't done so yet.”

Also, this first round of chips -- including AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core and Intel's Pentium D -- still produce more heat than designers would like. That forces the dual cores to ratchet themselves down at times and run at less than their potential top clock speeds. So, in fact, gamers and other users of high-intensity applications are often wise to use a PC based on a powerful single-core chip like AMD’s Athlon 64 FX.

A larger wave of multithreaded applications will arrive when Microsoft’s Windows Vista operating system ships in fall 2006, IDC's Rau says.

Just as importantly, the next generation of Intel dual-core chips will draw less power -- keeping their cool without compromise. Code-named “Conroe” for desktops, “Merom” for notebooks, and “Woodcrest” for servers, these chips should also debut in fall 2006.

Eight is Enough?

Multicore designs will be the dominant microprocessor trend for this decade and beyond, according to both Intel and AMD. By 2007, both companies plan to offer quad-core microprocessors for consumer desktop PCs. And Intel could introduce eight-core chips as soon as 2008, some analysts predict.

“You have to time the introduction of the hardware with the software,” says Phil Hester, AMD’s chief technology officer. “Going to two cores is a pretty good answer for many apps today.”

As AMD plans its future chips, including quad-core, it must balance chip production costs and software benefits. For instance, a chip with three cores and a large amount of cache memory may deliver more bang for the buck than a four-core chip, Hester says. That’s because many applications, including demanding ones like Adobe Photoshop, make use of cache memory to speed up tasks. "It may make more sense for us to spend on fewer cores and include more cache,” Hester says.

Another possibility that might give users of multicore machines a big performance payback is specialized cores designed to excel at certain tasks, say, graphics, Web browsing, or security tasks. “You might have one core running your XML stream while another does the standard PC work,” Hester says, mentioning that AMD is investigating this kind of design.

Fitting more cores into a microprocessor, however, is just the start of the design challenges that hardware and software companies will face in the era of multithreading. The fastest processor in the world will still wait around if a system’s main memory can’t keep pace with it. And this problem will grow if a chip has hundreds of cores.

Coming tomorrow: We take a closer look at the hardware and software challenges with multiple cores. What hurdles must be overcome before multicore processing can deliver on its promise?

Laurianne McLaughlin is a technology writer based in the Boston area.

Comments

  • Multicore Processors
    Good to see predications of multicore processors but the real devil is in the software. Writing multi-threaded apps has never been mainstream and I wonder how much potential re performance will be lost as the apps developers learn to appreciate the real &quotjoy&quot of mutex?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Carl Chilley)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Software matters
    As Phil Hester says, you need the software to run on these multicore machines. Ive recently bought a double core, 64bit processor and installed Windows XP 64bit edition. After a few days I had to remove it and install Linux instead. Windows was so buggy, unstable and lacking of performance that my investment was paying me back. It is crystal clear that Windows will require another 5 to 10 years to reach the same level of multiprocessing capabilities of Linux.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Fabian)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
    • Dont forget about sparc T1
      apropos to  the, Suns just-released SPARC T1 is an
      eight core sparc processor that
      runs cooler than any of the AMD/Intel chips.  Available in
      a couple sun servers now at
      prices starting at $3000 list.
      these guys are two years ahead of
      Intel--that could prove significant
      for sun.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Jordan)
      12/15/2005
      Posts:1
    • Dont forget about sparc T1
      apropos to  the, Suns just-released SPARC T1 is an
      eight core sparc processor that
      runs cooler than any of the AMD/Intel chips.  Available in
      a couple sun servers now at
      prices starting at $3000 list.
      these guys are two years ahead of
      Intel--that could prove significant
      for sun.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Jordan)
      12/15/2005
      Posts:1
  • Seen Suns Niagra Yet
    All this talk of what Intel will be doing misses the point that Sun already has done it! Their new Sparc systems just released have 8 cores per CPU and they will double that before Intel has their dual core out.

    As for the Intel/AMD rivalry there is no comparison. AMD just kicks Intels ass so royally on every benchmark that you cant say &quotdual core Intel&quot in front of knowledgable people without getting laughed at.

    They will get their act together eventually but why have your article so heavy with &quotIntel says&quot hype when they are so far behind?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Tim)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Multi-Cores?
    This was a nice article but you forgot the player who has built it all from Micros to Mainframes and beyond. That being none other than Big-Blue IBM. Sometime ago I read an article where they have a 15-core machine (I cant remember its code name.) that operates at 7.5 tera-flops which is the same speed as our brain.

    It seems to me if you are going to make a report it should include all the information and not just those that you get a press release. The picture of this Mini-Micro was in a single standard rack in an ISO lab room.

    Perhaps if you where to Google it, you would be able to add it to this report as part two.

    Adding to the consciousness of mankind’s ever increasing quest to make the sequel &quotTerminator&quot a reality I remain, JPS KC-MO.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (John Scott)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Suns Niagra and Rock
    Look at suns 8 Core, 32 thread CPU which is 5 years ahead in the industry in design
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (horge)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
    • Suns UltraSPARC T1 (Niagara)
      Sadly, Suns systems arent mentioned (T1000 and T2000). You should have a look at these.

      Still not sure whether all this stuff is relevant for PC users. PCs have workloads which differ substantially from server workloads. When it comes to microprocessors there is no one size fits all. I would be happy if people realizes, that computers are more than PCs. So any article about multi-cores and CMT must take computers into account and not only talk about PCs.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Steffo)
      12/16/2005
      Posts:1
    • Suns UltraSPARC T1 (Niagara)
      Sadly, Suns systems arent mentioned (T1000 and T2000). You should have a look at these.

      Still not sure whether all this stuff is relevant for PC users. PCs have workloads which differ substantially from server workloads. When it comes to microprocessors there is no one size fits all. I would be happy if people realizes, that computers are more than PCs. So any article about multi-cores and CMT must take computers into account and not only talk about PCs.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Steffo)
      12/16/2005
      Posts:1
  • Multicore Processors
    Good to see predications of multicore processors but the real devil is in the software. Writing multi-threaded apps has never been mainstream and I wonder how much potential re performance will be lost as the apps developers learn to appreciate the real &quotjoy&quot of mutex?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Carl Chilley)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Software matters
    As Phil Hester says, you need the software to run on these multicore machines. Ive recently bought a double core, 64bit processor and installed Windows XP 64bit edition. After a few days I had to remove it and install Linux instead. Windows was so buggy, unstable and lacking of performance that my investment was paying me back. It is crystal clear that Windows will require another 5 to 10 years to reach the same level of multiprocessing capabilities of Linux.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Fabian)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Seen Suns Niagra Yet
    All this talk of what Intel will be doing misses the point that Sun already has done it! Their new Sparc systems just released have 8 cores per CPU and they will double that before Intel has their dual core out.

    As for the Intel/AMD rivalry there is no comparison. AMD just kicks Intels ass so royally on every benchmark that you cant say &quotdual core Intel&quot in front of knowledgable people without getting laughed at.

    They will get their act together eventually but why have your article so heavy with &quotIntel says&quot hype when they are so far behind?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Tim)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Multi-Cores?
    This was a nice article but you forgot the player who has built it all from Micros to Mainframes and beyond. That being none other than Big-Blue IBM. Sometime ago I read an article where they have a 15-core machine (I cant remember its code name.) that operates at 7.5 tera-flops which is the same speed as our brain.

    It seems to me if you are going to make a report it should include all the information and not just those that you get a press release. The picture of this Mini-Micro was in a single standard rack in an ISO lab room.

    Perhaps if you where to Google it, you would be able to add it to this report as part two.

    Adding to the consciousness of mankind’s ever increasing quest to make the sequel &quotTerminator&quot a reality I remain, JPS KC-MO.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (John Scott)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1
  • Suns Niagra and Rock
    Look at suns 8 Core, 32 thread CPU which is 5 years ahead in the industry in design
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (horge)
    12/15/2005
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.