Communications

Big Bang Detector Heads to Space

A unique particle physics detector will be attached to the space station to study the universe and its origins.

  • Thursday, September 9, 2010
  • By Brittany Sauser

Detector test: The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer is undergoing an electro magnetic interference test at a European Space Agency laboratory in Holland. The test measures the level of electromagnetic radiation the detector is emitting and whether it is sensitive to the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the space station.
AMS Team

In an effort to uncover some of the universe's greatest mysteries, an international team of researchers has developed the largest space-based particle physics detector. Known as the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02), it will study the universe and its origins by searching for dark matter and antimatter and measuring the composition of cosmic rays with greater precision than any previous device.

"There is nothing else like it," says Trent Martin, NASA's project manager for the detector, which is being built by 56 institutions in 16 countries and sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy. Head of the AMS-02 collaboration is 1976 Nobel Laureate Samuel Ting, also a professor of physics at MIT. The spectrometer is set to fly to the International Space Station on the final space shuttle mission, scheduled for February. It will be attached to the outside of the space station and gather roughly seven gigabytes of data per second. That data will be sent to a ground station for analysis.

The core of the spectrometer is its doughnut-shaped magnet, one meter in diameter. At its center are eight individual detectors. The magnet pulls particles in, bending them in a direction that corresponds to their charge. The new instruments in the center can then measure different aspects of the particles such as their trajectory, mass, velocity, speed, and energy. AMS-02 also has an "anticounter" that rejects particles that enter at the wrong angle; a star tracker and GPS for accurate position and orientation; and more than 650 microprocessors to transform the signals from the detectors into digital information for ground-based computers to analyze.

The only current space-based experiment along the lines of AMS-02 is Pamela, a cosmic ray and dark matter detector launched by Russia and Italy in 2007. Pamela is much smaller and less sensitive than AMS-02, says Roberto Battiston, a professor of physics at the University of Perugia and the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Perugia, Italy, and the deputy spokesman for AMS-02. The new spectrometer weighs 7,000 kilograms and is over 4.5 meters wide and equally tall. "It would take Pamela one year to try and detect as much data as the new detector can gather in one to two days," Battiston says.

Print

Related Articles

Smashing Protons in the Cathedrals of Science

The search for the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider

Hunt for Dark Matter

New detectors may finally reveal dark-matter particles.

What We Don't Know in Physics

MIT physicists seek the origins of mass, the nature of dark matter, and beautiful equations to describe the universe.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

luddite

407 Comments

  • 520 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

ex mea sententia

Three points to make. 1.) There's no such thing as 'dark matter' the proper term is dark energy. 2.) There's no such thing as the 'big bang' it was more like a 'big burp.' 3.) They really should consult a good road map before they go off  looking for the origins of the Universe. One wrong turn and they could end up right back where they started from.

Reply

Vince658211

1 Comment

  • 508 Days Ago
  • 09/21/2010

Re: ex mea sententia

First of all, Dark Matter and Dark Energy are two entirely different things.
Secondly, while I agree there has not yet been proof of either WIMPs or MACHOs (the two types of hypothesized dark matter), CDMS, did make some interesting finds this past year. In fact they were interesting enough to be published in Science. Here's a link: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/327/5973/1619.pdf?ijkey=RVTKiEZ5rRmf2&keytype=ref&siteid=sci

Reply

cvichiee

1 Comment

  • 520 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

@ex..who r u??"God"'s own SpaceScience Advisor???
The assumptions about the existence of Dark matter/energy and big bang are based upon solid facts collected and confirmed by thousand of sources  and not some aimless day-dreaming...

Reply

rsanchez1

213 Comments

  • 520 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Re:

Yet, neither has been detected. I'd wager that they won't get detected with this detector, and they most likely won't ever be detected.

Reply

luddite

407 Comments

  • 520 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Re: No Subject

Listen up no subject.(cvichiee) Some good advice. I don't suffer fools gladly. Got an axe to grind? We have enough of that kind of crap to contend with already. So if you're one of these delusional, pray to the Lord on High, supplicants, who thinks he can infest this forum with his quasi-religious blather, you need a head check. But if you're looking for something to do in order to keep the faith, maybe you can join forces with the preacher down in Florida whose going to barbecue some Korans over the weekend. Or, perhaps this Sunday, you can go to church and tell all your friends just what kind of Godless heathen I am and that I will surely burn in Hell. Grow up no subject. While this is primarily a forum where independent thinkers can challenge each other over a variety of subjects, I don't recall that having a blind, dogmatic belief in the Almighty Creator, as being one of the more popular of them.

Reply

sdmitch16

14 Comments

  • 95 Days Ago
  • 11/08/2011

TROLL ALERT

Hi everybody. Just wanted to let you luddite is a troll and you shouldn't reply to him.

Reply

niebieskieucho

7 Comments

  • 519 Days Ago
  • 09/10/2010

Three observations

1. There was no Big Bang. 
2. The Universe/Nature has no origin. It just is! The origin has its materialized part only.
3. Searching for dark matter is futile in my opinion in contrast to so-called dark energy which I think is omnipresent magnetic field.

Reply

Advertisement

reeteshv

2 Comments

  • 519 Days Ago
  • 09/10/2010

Mine is bigger

Going by the statements attributed to him, Roberto Battistan sounds like he is more interested in scoring brownie points against Pamela

Reply

dkohn

49 Comments

  • 518 Days Ago
  • 09/11/2010

Falsifiability

I like to see people making predictions that can be tested with this instrument!  When the AMS has been up and running for some time I hope we get a clear answer and see who is right.  It will be cool to see direct evidence of the phenomenon.

Reply

sdmitch16

14 Comments

  • 95 Days Ago
  • 11/08/2011

Like this

Got dang it, where's the like or thumbs up button?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Claros Diagnostics

Applied Materials

Novartis

Facebook

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement