The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Handheld Hansel: Microsoft’s prototype Menlo device packs a compass and an array of navigation sensors (top). The Greenfield app (bottom) collects trail data such as exact footstep counts and direction changes.
Microsoft
A Microsoft research project explores whether sensors in mobile devices could help us navigate without GPS.
In the classic tale by the Brothers Grimm, Hansel and Gretel leave a trail of bread crumbs from their home so as not to get lost in the forest, but the plan fails when birds eat the crumbs. In the modern world, a GPS device could assist the fabled siblings. But what if they wandered into a place without GPS signals?
With that kind of problem in mind, a team of researchers at Microsoft set out to create a mobile device that could forge a trail of "digital bread crumbs." The device would collect the trail data while the user walked indoors, underground, or in other spaces where GPS signals are unavailable or weak--such as multilevel parking garages that can baffle people who forget where they parked.
The resulting Microsoft Research device, a prototype phone called Menlo, packs a suite of sensors: an accelerometer to detect movement, a side-mounted compass to determine direction, and a barometric pressure sensor to track changes in altitude.
While existing phones contain some of these sensors, what's new about Menlo is an app called Greenfield, which aims to solve the Hansel and Gretel problem by harnessing the data from the sensors. The goal is to count a user's sequence of steps, gauge direction changes, and even calculate how many floors the user has traversed by stairs or an elevator. The app stores the trail data so that a user can later retrace his path precisely.
The researchers call Greenfield an example of "activity-based navigation." In a paper to be presented at the MobileHCI conference in Lisbon, Portugal, next month, the Microsoft team positions Greenfield as an ideal method of navigation in places where maps haven't been constructed or aren't accessible. For the paper, computer scientist A.J. Brush and her team conducted a trial in which people had to retrieve an object from a colleague's parked car in a large garage, using the coworker's trail data to navigate the way.
"I knew this was possible, but I was wondering when someone would put all the pieces together," says Jeff Fischbach, a forensic technologist with SecondWave Information Systems, a consulting firm in Chatsworth, CA. Fischbach often serves as an expert witness in criminal trials in which GPS data is used as evidence. He says that trail data from an app like Greenfield could help determine whether a murder suspect is truthfully stating an alibi. "This kind of data is terrific for convicting people and terrific at exonerating people."
What I think is interesting about this technology is that it's a completely different way of thinking about travel - that it's not solely about the destination, but about the path one travels, complete with its twists, reversals and detours before finally reaching one's destination. Very zen!
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
colinnwn
88 Comments
And why did Microsoft...
...make up a term for this technology - "activity based navigation," when this technology isn't new and, a term has already been in use for decades?
It is simply called "dead reckoning." The only thing new is they have applied it to a smartphone. Car GPSes for navigation did this years ago back when small inexpensive GPS units were only accurate to 30 feet versus 3 feet today.
And what is Jeff talking about saying this is great for exonerating or convicting accused criminals? What are the chances a good criminal would be stupid enough to perform his act with a smartphone with location services turned on? It really is no different than current smart phones with GPS. This one just maintains a location fix for longer after GPS signals aren't receivable.
Reply
DHBuettner
2 Comments
Re: And why did Microsoft...
True, making up a term for this technology - "Activity Based Navigation," when this technology isn't new, but it is branding a new name. It is simply called "Dead Reckoning" or under a more general term "Guidance System." This is just one that maintains a location fix longer after any signals aren't receivable. My guidance comes from above too. It just comes from God and not from any man made devices. It's no brainer to just listen, follow, and rejoice after finding your way through the God given sensors you're given. Maybe, that's the way they used to find there man.
Reply
bevannwhite
1 Comment
Re: And why did Microsoft...
As a pilot who uses "Dead Reckoning" I believe that the new name is more accurate. In dead reckoning I use a known location, the speed I will travel and can measure a direction I want to go. I then fly that direction for the right amount of time and should get there.
What this is saying is that it documents how you got to where you are and without maps, or any knowledge of your intended pace it can guide you back to where you started. This builds a set of markers as you go. Then guides you in hitting those markers. That is not Dead Reckoning at all.
GPS accuracy isn't the issue either. When a GPS locates you it does so by placing you in a spot on the earth through mathematical means. The difference in timing from a number of satelites. That won't help you when you are off the map. It just says...you are here. Not much about how to get back to where you were.
This could be used to navigate yourself out of a complex building (for example) but only after you had gotten yourself in and only if you wanted to retrace your steps.
Reply
colinnwn
88 Comments
Re: And why did Microsoft...
You have an incomplete understanding of the terminology based on using it only in referring to your aviation activities.
You use dead reckoning (which is judging your current location based on starting from a known point and keeping track of speed, time, and direction traveled) along with maps to navigate from one known point to another. That doesn't mean (and in fact it would be inaccurate to say) dead reckoning is the specific action of moving from one known point to another without directional guidance beyond a compass.
If you have performed dead reckoning correctly, by its very essence you would be able to retrace your steps back to your origination point, which is what this Microsoft technology does, using the internal compass, and accelerometer to measure your walking rate and direction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_reckoning
I'm not sure where you were going with that GPS comment as it seems wrong and off-topic. If you have a GPS fix of your originating point, and a GPS fix of your end point, you should eventually be able to get back to your originating point by comparing your previous location and altitude to your current location and altitude. That doesn't mean you'll be able to take the same route back though, unless you have intermediate fixes.
Reply