The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Time lens: This silicon chip, called a time lens, is patterned with waveguides that split optical signals and combine them with laser light to speed data rates.
Alexander Gaeta
An energy-efficient silicon device compresses light to make ultrafast signals.
Researchers at Cornell University have developed a simple silicon device for speeding up optical data. The device incorporates a silicon chip called a "time lens," lengths of optical fiber, and a laser. It splits up a data stream encoded at 10 gigabits per second, puts it back together, and outputs the same data at 270 gigabits per second. Speeding up optical data transmission usually requires a lot of energy and bulky, expensive optics. The new system is energy efficient and is integrated on a compact silicon chip. It could be used to move vast quantities of data at fast speeds over the Internet or on optical chips inside computers.
Most of today's telecommunications data is encoded at a rate of 10 gigabits per second. As engineers have tried to expand to greater bandwidths, they've come up against a problem. "As you get to very high data rates, there are no easy ways of encoding the data," says Alexander Gaeta, professor of applied and engineering physics at Cornell University, who developed the silicon device with Michal Lipson, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering. Their work is described online in the journal Nature Photonics.
The new device could also be a critical step in the development of practical optical chips. As electronics speed up, "power consumption is becoming a more constraining issue, especially at the chip level," says Keren Bergman, professor of electrical engineering at Columbia University, who was not involved with the research. "You can't have your laptop run faster without it getting hotter" and consuming more energy, says Bergman. Electronics have an upper limit of about 100 gigahertz. Optical chips could make computers run faster without generating waste heat, but because of the nature of light--photons don't like to interact--it takes a lot of energy to create speedy optical signals.
The new ultrafast modulator gets around this problem because it can compress data encoded with conventional equipment to ultrahigh speeds. The Cornell device is called a "time telescope." While an ordinary lens changes the spatial form of a light wave, a time lens stretches it out or compresses it over time. Brian Kolner, now a professor of applied science and electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Davis, laid the theoretical groundwork for the time lens in 1988 while working at Hewlett-Packard. He made one in the early 1990s, but it required an expensive crystal modulator that took a lot of energy. The Cornell work, Kolner says, is "a sensible engineering step forward to reduce the proofs of principle to a useful practice."
Sounds like an optical example of a conversion from time-domain to frequency-domain, and back again after a manipulation to compress the signal... I have to agree with ms, "the previous caller", that all the timing would seem to have to be gated relative to the ~tail-end~ of the incoming 10-gig data-stream.
Because if the point is that they've come up with a new-and-improved-way to inject a packet of 10-gig data into a 270-gig carrier channel, that best gets my attention if the packet-duration has been compressed to ~1/27th of its original interval (all the data toggling at 10-gig bit-intervals is now toggling at 270 gig bit-intervals).
In other words, the meaningful spec I seem to be missing is the latency involved -- if I send a packet in THIS end, how long before it comes out the OTHER end (notice I'm NOT asking what the data rate is at that point) relative to the terminator of my input packet.
I've just signed up for a Nature Photonics access, since it sounds like I'm going to have to go directly to the source document to get some graphical descriptions.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
ms
190 Comments
speeding?
This article makes no sense to me. If I have 10 Gbits/s of data coming in, there's no way I can speed up the datarate, because I'd need data that hasn't arrived yet. Of course, I could buffer up a bunch of data and retransmit it faster, but it wouldn't get to its destination any faster than it was orginally sent. Now, if I had multiple streams of 10 Gbit/s data, I could multiplex those into a single higher rate stream. Perhaps that's what you're trying to describe?
Reply
walt
66 Comments
Re: speeding?
Does modulation of 100MHz RF signals with 20kHz acoustical signals make sense? Such are the wonders of modulation.
Reply
anantou
1 Comment
Re: speeding?
The way i understand it is that the transmission of information is a bottleneck as with current approaches it is limited to 10gbs. This new method allows speeds as high as 270gbs WHEN your data is provided at such rate. So although you are right than when your data is at 10gbs there is no way to speed up the transmission when the data come at 270gbs it could come handy :-)
Reply