Communications

Wi-Fi via White Spaces

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Tuesday, August 18, 2009
  • By Erica Naone

Some of the challenges that faced the group came about because of the undefined nature of white-space frequencies. . The researchers designed their algorithms to determine the ideal amount of frequency bandwidth to use for a broadcast, balancing the desire for strong signal against the possibility of interference with neighboring frequencies. They also had to design a way for mobile devices to find a signal from an access point.

One of the most important parts of the White Fi system is a protocol for dealing with collisions among different signals (particularly those from wireless microphones, which can turn on at any time). Even a single packet of interference is enough to produce audible disruptions for a microphone. Even if interference affects only one device on the network, strict regulations forbid all devices on the network from using that channel. The researchers got around this by designing the access point so that it maintains a backup channel. If another user is detected, the white-space device or access point immediately switches to the backup channel, which reassigns bandwidth use as needed.

Peter Steenkiste, a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University who specializes in networking, says that previous work on white spaces has focused on addressing one problem at a time. "The thing that I think is very interesting about this paper is that it really has looked at how you put a complete system together," he says.

Steenkiste adds that "there are a lot of practical issues that they've worried about." In particular, he says, the researchers did not assume an ideal, controlled environment for their system. Rather, they took into account such problems as measurement "noise" and the unpredictable behavior of wireless microphones. "[The research] has an answer for every question," Steenkiste says.

Chandra says that his group recently received an experimental license from the FCC that allows them to build a prototype White Fi system on the Microsoft Research Campus in Redmond, WA. They plan to send their findings to the FCC in the hope that the data will help determine future white-space regulations. Chandra notes that since the transition from analog to digital television is happening worldwide, there is a high level of international interest in US white-space experiments. Researchers and companies all over the world are looking for technologies to take advantage of the fragments of spectrum that will open up in the coming years, he says.

More in Communications

Watching the Road

Read More »
Print

Related Articles

Will Super Wi-Fi Live Up To Its Name?

The next generation of Wi-Fi was supposed to offer a big boost in capacity and range.

Microsoft Wants to Rule the White Spaces

After years of research, Microsoft hopes to provide a system that lets data communications weave through TV frequencies.

Study Shows Inequalities in "White-Spaces" Wireless

People in rural areas may gain more wireless airspace from the shutdown of analog television.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

lasertekk

146 Comments

  • 911 Days Ago
  • 08/18/2009

Well, yes...

There's a reason the law was passed, the spectrum auctioned off and analog TV transmissions were kicked off.  This decently high frequency band allows good transmission distance without the need for towers.  Hhmmm.  I wonder who that will benefit?  Think of the new services they can offer, at some new ungodly monthly fee.  It was a special interest sponsored business plan from day one.

Reply

aymeric

30 Comments

  • 909 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2009

...and your point is?

Do you not pay for your cell phone? your cable TV etc... I would gladly pay a fee (which will always be as high as the market will allow)for fast wireless connectivity. Also think of the millions of people that will benefit from this technology. People who are still using dial up. And I am not only talking about the first world. Think of how much cheaper a fast wireless network will be for poor countries and what it will do to the digital divide. Making money while helping others is not a bad thing. Hell , making money in general is not a bad thing. It is that drive that gets cool gadgets  from the lab into your home. If it were not for that wish you would still be playing pong on your TV today.

Reply

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 903 Days Ago
  • 08/26/2009

Re: ...and your point is?

Back room deals or not, I suspect that by increasing the number of potential service providers means more competition and "should" result in lower more competative rates for consumers. There may be some slick applications riding those frequencies too.

Maybe:
a channel for Civil Services
a channel for Telecommuting
A channel for Educational needs
A channel for music downloading or special content
A channel for digitized voice services
A set of channels for monitoring our environment

The list could be pretty large


However - just to be safe and throw in a curve in favor of conspiracy theories - those reduced rates will be negotiated by the Government whom will make 100% certain they take their slice of the pie or generous political contributions.

Reply

lasertekk

146 Comments

  • 907 Days Ago
  • 08/22/2009

The point IS

I don't have a problem with the technology.  I wouldn't be here at TR if I did.  I have a problem with the back room agreements created to benefit certain individuals.  If you don't know what I mean by that, you have not been paying attention to the news for the last two years, the state of the economy and those who created the mess.

Reply

unknownsoundman

1 Comment

  • 607 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Re: The point IS

I too, have concerns, when it does not benefit all parties equally.
I live in a metro area, precisely so I can have Broadband, and this plan does me no favors.
I will still be required to consume the Big Media Corps Swill and Spin on Reality, while they distort the facts, and lift my wallet...monthly.
This tech should benefit All Equally
>regardless of locality...It should be...
A clearly drawn line on frequency division.
In the Digital TVv Broadcast Arena, I assume they are already Spreading themselves as Wide as possible.
Allow those who do not support the Big Media Stance to have a reasonable alternative, as it is their spectrum too.

Reply

ka5s

60 Comments

  • 905 Days Ago
  • 08/24/2009

Non pasaran?

Cognitive radio in general suffers from the deficiency that it cannot protect spectrum users it doesn't recognize.  An unlicensed spectrum user, however, must accept whatever interference it receives, and not interfere with licensed users. Merely recognizing a WiFi signal is not enough if somewhere under the device noise floor is a voice or data link with priority.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Pacific Biosciences

Facebook

Cellular Dynamics International

eSolar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement